
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 660 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,647 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,704,447 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,196,878 |
Presenting a non-linear model and optimization of conservatism and cost of equity based on the moderating role of corporate governance quality | ||
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 19 مهر 1404 اصل مقاله (544.88 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33852.5048 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Saeid Ahmadvand؛ Azita Jahanshad* ؛ Zahra Pourzamani | ||
Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 02 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 خرداد 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
Conservatism can reduce equity costs to the optimal level, and then, of course, increasing the level of conservatism will increase equity costs. Considering the existing (linear) relationships between conservatism and the cost of equity, it is important to know whether there is a non-linear relationship between these two components, and considering the impact of corporate governance on this type of relationship (in comparative terms), this issue was also investigated. In this regard, using a non-linear model, the existence of a uniform or U-shaped relationship between conservatism and the cost of equity was investigated. This research has been carried out in the framework of inductive-inductive arguments. In this research, library and field methods were used to collect information. The theoretical foundations and the research carried out were used as a library basis. The statistical population of this research includes all the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the financial periods of 2013-2022. According to Cochran's formula, the number of samples used in this research has been obtained for an error of 0.085 (about 8.5%). According to research findings, there is a non-linear relationship between accounting conservatism and cost of equity. Therefore, it is obvious that the U relationship is the opposite meaning that if conservatism increases in a company, the cost of equity will increase first, and after a certain level of conservatism, an increase in conservatism will lead to a decrease in the cost of equity. Also, the quality of corporate governance affects the non-linear relationship between accounting conservatism and the cost of equity. For this purpose, 5 components of corporate governance, including independence of the board of directors, concentration of ownership, ownership of institutional shareholders, managerial ownership and ownership of real shareholders, were investigated, and the results showed that the quality of corporate governance has a significant effect on the non-linear relationship between accounting conservatism and the cost of equity. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
non-linear model؛ conservatism؛ equity cost؛ corporate governance quality | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Y. Altunbas and J. Thornton, Fiscal decentralization and governance, Available at SSRN 1570084, 2010. [2] T.C. Artiach and P.M. Clarkson, Disclosure, conservatism and the cost of equity capital: A review of the foundation literature, Account. Finance 51 (2011), no. 1, 2–49. [3] M. Bagnoli and S.G. Watts, Financial reporting and Voluntary disclosures, Purdue University, 2005. [4] S. Basu, The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings1, J. Account. Econ. 24 (1997), no. 1, 3–37. [5] M. Bevir and B. Krupicka, On two types of governance theory. A response to B. Guy Peters, Critic. Policy Stud. 5 (2011), no. 4, 450–453. [6] G.C. Biddle and G. Hilary, Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment, Account. Rev. 81 (2006), no. 5, 963–982. [7] J.H. Bliss, Management Through Accounts, Ronald Press Company, 1924. [8] A.L.-C. Chan, S.W. Lin, and N. Strong, Accounting conservatism and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence, Manag. Finance 35 (2009), no. 4, 325–345. [9] F. Chen and Y. Li, Voluntary adoption of more stringent governance policy on audit committees: Theory and empirical evidence, Account. Rev. 88 (2013), no. 6, 1939–1969. [10] F.-W. Chen, M.-X. Lin, and T. Wang, Sustainable resource acquisition path: A dynamic model of embedded entrepreneurial network governance under uncertainty, Sustainability 10 (2018), no. 11, 4061. [11] Y. Fang, F. Zhang, C. Zhou, and M. Chen, Governance capability of the public health system: A Comparative analysis of the control of COVID-19 in the different provinces of China, Int. J. Envir. Res. Public Health 18 (2021), no. 8, 4210. [12] J. Francis, R. LaFond, P.M. Olsson and K. Schipper, Costs of equity and earnings attributes, Account. Rev. 79 (2004), no. 4, 967–1010. [13] J.M. García Lara, B.G. Osma and A. Mora, The effect of earnings management on the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, J. Bus. Finance Account. 32 (2005), no. 3-4, 691–726. [14] J. Gassen and R.U. Fülbier, Do creditors prefer smooth earnings? Evidence from European private firms, J. Int. Account. Res. 14 (2015), no. 2, 151–180. [15] F. Gigler, C. Kanodia, H. Sapra, and R. Venugopalan, Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contracts, J. Account. Res. 47 (2009), no. 3, 767–797. [16] C. Happ, The importance of governance and risk management in corporate finance: An empirical analysis of financing and interest rate risks, PhD diss., Darmstadt, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2016. [17] G. Helbok and M. Walker, On the nature and rationality of analysts’ forecasts under earnings conservatism, Br. Account. Rev. 36 (2004), no. 1, 45–77. [18] M. Jalili and A. Asadi, Investigating the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on accounting conservatism in listed companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange, Account. Audit. Res. 14 (2022), no. 56, 207–222. [19] A. Jashni, F. Khoshkar, and D. Gorjizadeh, The relationship between conditional conservatism and profitability of companies (comparative approach in leveraged and capital companies), Quart. Specialized Sci. J. Res. Account. Econ. Sci. 4 (2020), no. 2 (consecutive 12). [20] D. Johnstone, The effect of information on uncertainty and the cost of capital, Contemp. Account. Res. 33 (2016), no. 2, 752–774. [21] M. Khalifa, H. Zouaoui, H. Ben Othman, and K. Hussainey, Exploring the nonlinear effect of conditional conservatism on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from emerging markets, J. Int. Account. Audit. Taxat. 36 (2019), 100272. [22] M. Khan and R.L. Watts, Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism, J. Account. Econ. 48 (2009), no. 2-3, 132–150. [23] R. Lambert, Lambert review of business-university collaboration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1509981, (2003). [24] S. Lee, Negotiated power: The state, elites, and local governance in twelfth-to fourteenth-century China, BRILL, 2020. [25] M.K. Lewis, Principles of Islamic corporate governance, In: M.K. Hassan and M.K. Lewis (Eds.), Handbook on Islam and Economic Life, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014, pp. 243–267. [26] S. Liu, The impact of ownership structure on conditional and unconditional conservatism in China: Some new evidence, J. Int. Account. Audit. Taxat. 34 (2019), 49–68. [27] X. Lu, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, and Y. Chen, Corporate social responsibility and enterprise performance: the chain mediating effect test based on corporate reputation and brand value, J. Inf. Knowledge Manag. 22 (2023), no. 5, 2350022. [28] H. Markovitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1959. [29] Y.M. Mensah, X. Song, and S.S. Ho, The effect of conservatism on analysts’ annual earnings forecast accuracy and dispersion, J. Account. Audit. Finance, 19 (2004), no. 2, 159–183. [30] L. Nan and X. Wen, Penalties, manipulation, and investment efficiency, Manag. Sci. 65 (2019), no. 10, 4878–4900. [31] S.R. Osmani, Participatory governance and poverty reduction, Choices for the poor: lessons from national poverty strategies, UNDP, New York, 2001. [32] J. Pae and D. Thornton, Accounting conservatism and inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts, Working Paper, Queen's University, School of Business, Kingston, Canada, 2006. [33] P.F. Pope and M. Walker, Ex-ante and ex-post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness, Lancaster University and The University of Manchester, 2003. [34] M. Rahimpour, S.K. Ghaderzadeh and S.R. Hosseini, The role of accounting conservatism in firms’ achievement of target financial leverage, Appl. Res. Financ. Report. 12 (2023), no. 1, 69–92. [35] M. Rashidi, Manager optimism based on environmental uncertainty and accounting conservatism, Interdisciplinary J. Manag. Stud. 14 (2021), no. 1, 61–86. [36] G.W. Ruch and G. Taylor, Accounting conservatism: A review of the literature, J. Account. Liter. 34 (2015), no. 1, 17–38. [37] L.J. Sharpe, The failure of local government modernization in Britain: A critique of functionalism, Canad. Public Admin. 24 (1981), no. 1, 92–115. [38] T. Sofiani, Legal status of domestic workers in Indonesia in labor law and the implication on employment relationship, JL Poly Glob. 30 (2014), 33. [39] R.R. Sterling, On theory construction and verification, Account. Rev. 45 (1970), no. 3, 444–457. [40] L. Trainor, *Policy-making at the colonial office: Robert Meade, the Berlin conference, and New Guinea 1884-5*, J. Imper. Commonwealth History 6 (1978), no. 2, 119–143. [41] D. Watt, A. Langa, and E. Maclean, Governance and the role of the board, In: A director's guide to governance in the boardroom, Routledge, 2022, pp. 1–54. [42] X. Xu, X. Wang, and N. Han, Accounting conservatism, ultimate ownership and investment efficiency, China Finance Rev. Int. 2 (2012), no. 1, 53–77. [43] D. Zhang, F. Fan, and S.D. Park, Network analysis of actors and policy keywords for sustainable environmental governance: Focusing on Chinese environmental policy, Sustainability 11 (2019), no. 15, 4068. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3 |