پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 671 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,743 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,297,858 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,563,472 |
Optimal Technology Selection Between String and Central Inverters for a 100 MW Solar PV Plant in Tehran Province Using AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR Methods | ||
| Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 21، دی 2025، صفحه 45-54 اصل مقاله (1013.39 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/mseee.2025.39120.1229 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad-Reza Nickpay* ؛ Karim GoudarziKia؛ Roohallah Amirabadi-Farahani | ||
| Tehran Regional Electric Company, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 31 شهریور 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 19 آبان 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study focuses on the critical decision of selecting an optimal inverter technology for a 100 MW solar photovoltaic plant in Tehran province, Iran. Recognizing the complexity of this task, which involves multiple conflicting technical, economic, and qualitative criteria, the paper employs three well-established multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and the VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method. Two specific inverter models from Sungrow, the SG350HX string inverter and the SG8800UD-MV-20 central inverter, are evaluated against a comprehensive set of criteria, including efficiency, total cost of ownership, reliability, warranty, grid support features, compatibility, protection features, environmental condition tolerance, smart features, and brand reputation. The AHP method is utilized to determine the weights of these criteria. Subsequently, TOPSIS and VIKOR are applied to rank the inverter alternatives based on hypothetical performance data. The results from both TOPSIS and VIKOR analyses, under the assumed scenario, indicated a preference for the Sungrow SG8800UD-MV-20 central inverter. The study also emphasizes the importance of conducting thorough sensitivity analyses for AHP criteria weights, TOPSIS performance values, and the VIKOR compromise strategy parameter to ensure the robustness of the decision. Environmental conditions and grid connection requirements specific to Tehran province are also considered as vital factors in the selection process. The paper concludes by recommending further investigation of the central inverter, contingent on detailed real-world data and expert judgments, and suggests future research avenues, including the incorporation of more extensive data and additional MCDM techniques. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| MCDM؛ AHP؛ TOPSIS؛ VIKOR؛ Inverter؛ String؛ and Central | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Nickpay, M.R., Amirabadifarahani, R., and Goudarzikia, K., 2024. Feasibility Study of Technical and Economic Aspects for the Construction of a 1.1 MWp Photovoltaic Power Plant in a District of Tehran. Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 4(2), pp.57-66.
[2] Zhou, Y. et al. (2021) 'PV array and inverter optimum sizing for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants using optimization design', Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1878(1), p. 012015.
[3] Hossain, C.A. et al. (2022) 'Optimal inverter and wire selection for solar photovoltaic fencing applications', Renewable Energy Focus, 42, pp. 115–125.
[4] El-Bayeh, C.Z., Alzaareer, K., Brahmi, B., Zellagui, M. and Eicker, U., 2021. An original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for solar panels selection in buildings. Energy, 217, p.119396.
[5] Saaty, T. L., “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.
[6] Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G. H., “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004.
[7] Refsnider, B. and Ferguson, C., “Optimization of inverter selection in PV farms using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method,” Renewable Energy Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 221–230, 2021.
[8] Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd. (2023) *DS 20221207 SG350HX Datasheet V18 EN: Multi-MPPT String Inverter for 1500 Vdc Systems.
[9] Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd. (2023) *DS 20230615 SG8800UD-MV-20 Datasheet V15 EN: Turnkey Central Inverter Station for 1500Vdc Systems.
[10] Prayogo, B., Yudisaputro, H., and Kurniawan, A., 2023, December. Enhancing Renewable Energy Integration: A Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Optimal Inverter Selection in Solar PV and Wind Turbine Systems. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Energy Technologies for Future Grids (ETFG) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[11] Ridha, H.M., Gomes, C., Hizam, H., Ahmadipour, M., Muhsen, D.H. and Ethaib, S., 2020. Optimum design of a standalone solar photovoltaic system based on novel integration of iterative-PESA-II and AHP-VIKOR methods. Processes, 8(3), p.367.
[12] Sahoo, S.K. and Goswami, S.S., 2023. A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) Methods: advancements, applications, and future directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), pp.25-48.
[13] Nyamathulla, S. and Chittathuru, D., 2023. A review of multilevel inverter topologies for grid-connected sustainable solar photovoltaic systems. Sustainability, 15(18), p.13376.
[14] Deshpande, S. and Bhasme, N.R., 2017. A review of topologies of inverter for grid connected PV systems. 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), pp.1-6.
[15] Hassaine, L., OLias, E., Quintero, J. and Salas, V., 2014. Overview of power inverter topologies and control structures for grid connected photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, pp.796-807.
[16] Alshamrani, A., Majumder, P., Das, A., Hezam, I.M. and Božanić, D., 2023. An integrated BWM-TOPSIS-I approach to determine the ranking of alternatives and application of sustainability analysis of renewable energy. Axioms, 12(2), p.159.
[17] NREL, "Impact of IEEE Std 1547 on Smart Inverters and the Applications in Power Systems," National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. TP-5500-77143, 2020.
[18] Shao, M., Han, Z., Sun, J., Xiao, C., Zhang, S., and Zhao, Y., 2020. A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection. Renewable Energy, 157, pp.377-403.
[19] Manoj, V., Pilla, R. and Pudi, V.N., 2023, August. Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Solar Panels Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2570, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing.
[20] Tomczewski, A., Mikulski, S. and Szymenderski, J., 2024. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Select the Final Solution for Multi-Criteria Optimization of the Structure of a Hybrid Generation System with Energy Storage. Energies (19961073), 17(24).
[21] Briceño, C.P., Ponce, P., Fayek, A.R., Anthony, B., Bradley, R., Peffer, T., Meier, A., and Mei, Q., 2025. Optimizing Solar PV Deployment in Manufacturing: A Morphological Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Processes, 13(4), p.1120.
[22] Wang, X. and Wang, K., 2021. A multi-criteria decision-making method based on triangular interval-valued fuzzy numbers and the VIKOR method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(1), pp.221-233.
[23] IRENA, "Grid Codes for Renewable Powered Systems," International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2022.
[24] Nhi, T.H.T., Wang, C.N. and Van Thanh, N., 2022. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Solar Power Plant Location Selection. Computers, Materials & Continua, 72(3). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1 |
||