| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 676 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,863 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,972,724 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 49,265,234 |
Simulating an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model of innovation labs for technology-based firms (TBFs) of Iran (case study: Firms in Pardis Technology Park of Tehran) to predict the level of digitalization of the innovation process | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 01 دی 1404 اصل مقاله (2.25 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33900.5056 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Bagheri1؛ Reza Radfar* 1؛ Sepehr Ghazinoori2 | ||
| 1Department of Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 04 اسفند 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 25 اردیبهشت 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aims to simulate an adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference system model of innovation labs, which is a model to predict the level of digitization of the innovation process in knowledge-based companies. The results of 188 indicators were distributed among 18 experts in this field in the form of a 5-point Likert questionnaire and a two-round Delphi method. The result of the work was 5 components as input to the model, which were sent in the form of a questionnaire to 230 knowledge-based companies in Pardis Technology Park, of which 198 companies completed and resubmitted. From this number of samples, 150 data points were isolated for training data and 48 data as model testing based on a random function. In the last phase, i.e. modelling, the adaptive fuzzy-neural inference method was used for the model. The network separation method or the lookup table (PG) in MATLAB 2023 software was used to evaluate the performance of the model using the root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error(E). This research was able to present the design model of a smart innovation lab with a very low error. As a result, it was able to achieve effective indicators in the degree of digitalization of the innovation process. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Smart Innovation Lab؛ Digital Innovation؛ Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)؛ Digital transformation؛ technology-based firms (TBFs)؛ ANFIS model design؛ innovation process؛ Digitalization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, Artificial intelligence, automation, and work, A. Agrawal, J. Gans and A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 197–236. [2] African Union, The digital transformation strategy for Africa (2020–30), www.au.int, 2020. [3] M. Agbali, C. Trillo, I.A. Ibrahim, Y. Arayici, and T. Fernando, Are smart innovation ecosystems really seeking to meet citizens’ needs? Insights from the stakeholders’ vision on smart city strategy implementation, Smart Cities 2 (2019), no. 2, 307–327. [4] P. Agrawal, Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development, J. Pharmaco. 6 (2018), no. 02. [5] M. Al-Amin, T. Hossain, and J. Islam, The technology development and management of smart manufacturing system: A review on theoretical and technological perspectives, Eur. Sci. J. 17 (2021), no. 43, 170–193. [6] S. Albukhitan, Developing digital transformation strategy for manufacturing, Proc. Comput. Sci. 170 (2020), 664–671. [7] S. Alter, The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results, Work System Method, 2006. [8] W.A. Ansari, P. Diya, S. Patil, and S. Patil, A review on robotic process automation-the future of business organizations, 2nd Int. Conf. Adv. Sci. Technol., 2019. [9] M. Arkesteijn, B. Van Merlo and C. Leeuwis, The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation, Evaluation 21 (2015), no. 1, 99–115. [10] A. Asadullah, I. Faik, and A. Kankanhalli, Digital platforms: A review and future directions, 22nd Pacific Asia Conf. Inf. Syst. (PACIS 2018), Yokohama, Japan, Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2018, no. 248. [11] J. Åström, W. Reim, and V. Parida, Value creation and value capture for AI business model innovation: A three-phase process framework, Rev. Manag. Sci. 16 (2022), no. 7, 2111–2133. [12] P.-A. Balland, R. Boschma, and K. Frenken, Proximity and innovation networks: An evolutionary approach, Re-framing Regional Development, Routledge, 2013, pp. 186–200. [13] C. Bason and A. Schneider, Global Trends in Design, C. Bason, (ed.) Design for policy, Farnham: Gower Ashgate, 2014. [14] C. Beaudoin, S. Joncoux, J.-F. Jasmin, A. Berberi, C. McPhee, R.S. Schillo, and V.M. Nguyen, A research agenda for evaluating living labs as an open innovation model for environmental and agricultural sustainability, Envir. Challenge. 7 (2022), p. 100505. [15] G.B. Benitez, N.F. Ayala, and A.G. Frank, Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 228 (2020), 107735. [16] A. Bharadwaj, O.A. El Sawy, P.A. Pavlou, and N.V. Venkatraman, Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights, MIS Quart. 37 (2013), no. 2, 471–482. [17] S.E. Bibri and J. Krogstie, The emerging data-driven Smart City and its innovative applied solutions for sustainability: The cases of London and Barcelona, Energy Inf. 3 (2020), 1–42. [18] P.M. Bican and A. Brem, Digital business model, digital transformation, digital entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable “digital”?, Sustainability 12 (2020), no. 13, p. 5239. [19] L. Bloom and R. Faulkner, Innovation spaces: lessons from the United Nations, Third World Quart. 37 (2016), no. 8, 1371–1387. [20] M. Bogers, H. Chesbrough, and C. Moedas, Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies, California Manag. Rev. 60 (2018), no. 2, 5–16. [21] M. Bogers, R. Hadar, and A. Bilberg, Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102 (2016), 225–239. [22] A. Booth, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, D. Moler, M. Petticrew, and L. Stewart, An international registry of systematic-review protocols, Lancet 377 (2011), no. 9760, 108–109. [23] R.B. Bouncken, S. Kraus, and N. Roig-Tierno, Knowledge-and innovation-based business models for future growth: Digitalized business models and portfolio considerations, Rev. Manag. Sci. 15 (2021), no. 1, 1–14. [24] H. Brüdigese, A divergent view of the impact of digital transformation on academic organizational and spending efficiency: A review and analytical study on a university E-service, Sustainability 13 (2021), no. 13, p. 7048. [25] J. Brown, T. Gosling, B. Sethi, B. Sheppard, C. Stubbings, J. Sviokla, J. Williams, D. Zarubina, and L. Fisher, Workforce of the Future: The Competing Forces Shaping 2030, London, PWC, 2017. [26] R.S. Burt, Bridge decay, Soc. Networks 24 (2002), no. 4, 333–363. [27] J. Buvat, B. Gilchriest, E. Turkington, S. KVJ, and A. Ghosh, The Discipline of Innovation: Making Sure Your Innovation Center Aktually Makes Your Organization More Innovative, Digital Transformation Institute, 2017. [28] Capgemini Digital Transformation Institute, The Digital Talent Gap: Are Companies Doing Enough?, Capgemini and LinkedIn, 2017. [29] C. Cautela, P. Pisano, and M. Pironti, The emergence of new networked business models from technology innovation: An analysis of 3-D printing design enterprises*, Int. Entrepr. Manag. J. 10 (2014), 487–501. [30] C. Cennamo, Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective, Acad. Manag. Persp. 35 (2021), no. 2, 265–291. [31] M. Chen, Education Nation: Six Leading Edges of Innovation in our Schools, John Wiley & Sons, 2010. [32] C.M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business Review Press, 2015. [33] G. Christian, Predictive coding: Adopting and adapting artificial intelligence in civil litigation, Can. B. Rev. 97 (2019), 486. [34] F. Ciampi, R. Rialti, and G. Marzi, Artificial intelligence, big data, strategic flexibility, agility, and organizational resilience: A conceptual framework based on existing literature, Int. Conf. WWW/Internet 2018 Appl. Comput., 2018. [35] M.V. Ciasullo, M. Calabrese, and A. La Sala, Surfing across industrial revolutions: a resilient sensemaking perspective on innovation, Glob. Bus. Org. Excell. 43 (2024), no. 2, 27–42. [36] R.F. Ciriello, A. Richter, and G. Schwabe, Digital innovation, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60 (2018), 563–569. [37] J. Clark, Manufacturing by design: the rise of regional intermediaries and the re-emergence of collective action, Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 7 (2014), no. 3, 433–448. [38] M. Coccia, Artificial intelligence technology in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges for detection of lung and breast cancer, J. Soc. Admin. Sci. 6 (2019), no. 2, 82–98. [39] M. Coccia, Technological innovation, Innovations 11 (2021), I12. [40] A. Corre and G. Mischke, The Innovation Game: A New Approach to Innovation Management and R&D, Springer Science & Business Media, 2005. [41] A. Coşkun-Seitrek and Z. Tanrıkulu, Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model, Technol. Soc. 64 (2021), 101461. [42] M.S. Dahl and C.O. Pedersen, Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?, Res. Policy 33 (2004), no. 10, 1673–1686. [43] V. Desai and B. Vidyapeeth, Digital marketing: A review, Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev. 5 (2019), no. 5, 196–200. [44] M. De Silva and M. Wright, Entrepreneurial co-creation: societal impact through open innovation, R&D Manag. 49 (2019), no. 3, 318–342. [45] P. D’Este, S. Iammarino, M. Savona and N. Von Tunzelmann, What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers, Res. Policy 41 (2012), no. 2, 482–488. [46] R. Dorschel, Discovering needs for digital capitalism: The hybrid profession of data science, Big Data Soc. 8 (2021), no. 2, 20539517211040760. [47] N.D. Du Preez and L. Louw, A framework for managing the innovation process, PICMET’08-2008 Portland Int. Conf. Manag. Engin. Technol., IEEE, 2008, pp. 546–558. [48] B. Evans and S.M. Cheng, Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work?, Canad. Public Admin. 64 (2021), no. 4, 587–610. [49] A. Eyring, N. Hoyt, J. Tenny, R. Domike, and Y. Hovanski, Analysis of a closed-loop digital twin using discrete event simulation, Int. J. Adv. Manufactur. Technol. 123 (2022), no. 1–2, 245–258. [50] I. Fazey, N. Schäpke, G. Caniglia, A. Hodgson, I. Kendrick, C. Lyon, G. Page, J. Patterson, C. Riedy, and T. Strasser, Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 70 (2020), 101724. [51] F. Fecher, J. Winding, K. Hutter, and J. Fuller, Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective, J. Bus. Res. 110 (2020), 567–576. [52] R.G. Fichman, B.L. Dos Santos, and Z. Zheng, Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum, MIS Quart. 38 (2014), no. 2, 329-A315. [53] A. Garzoni, I. De Turi, G. Secundo, and P. Del Vecchio, Fostering digital transformation of SMEs: A four levels approach, Manag. Decis. 58 (2020), no. 8, 1543–1562. [54] R. Gey, L.-P. Meyer, and M. Thieme, A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon innovation laboratory: A structuralional viewpoint, Proc. XXIII Int. RESER Conf., Aix en Provence, France, 2013, pp. 1–17. [55] P.M. Gilch and J. Sieweke, Recruiting digital talent: The strategic role of recruitment in organisations’ digital transformation, German J. Human Resource Manag. 35 (2021), no. 1, 53–82. [56] A. Goldfarb and D. Trefler, Artificial intelligence and international trade, A. Agrawal, J. Gans and A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019, pp. 463–492. [57] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2016. [58] A. Grguric, E. Vlačić, and N. Drvenkar, Assessing firms’competitiveness and technological advancement by applying artificial intelligence as a differentiation strategy-a proposed conceptual model, M. Milkovic, K. Hammes and O. Bakhtina (Eds.), Economic and social development: Book of proceedings, Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, 2020, pp. 43–61. [59] L. Guo and L. Xu, The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector, Sustainability 13 (2021), no. 22, p. 12844. [60] M. Haenlein and A. Kaplan, A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence, California Manag. Rev. 61 (2019), no. 4, 5–14. [61] L.A. Hall and S. Bagchi-Sen, A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry, Technovation 22 (2002), no. 4, 231–244. [62] S.Y. Han and S.J. Bae, Internalization of R&D outsourcing: An empirical study, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 150 (2014), 58–73. [63] J. Han, I. Bose, N. Hu, B. Qi, and G. Tian, Does director interlock impact corporate R&D investment?, Decis. Support Syst. 71 (2015), 28–36. [64] A. Hanelt, R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. Antunes Marante, A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change, J. Manag. Stud. 58 (2021), no. 5, 1159–1197. [65] A. Harraf, I. Wanasika, K. Tate, and K. Talbott, Organizational agility, J. Appl. Bus. Res. 31 (2015), no. 2, 675–686. [66] R. Harris, A. Krenz, and J. Moffat, The effects of absorptive capacity on innovation performance: A cross-country perspective, J. Common Market Stud. 59 (2021), no. 3, 589–607. [67] T.K. Hazra and B. Unhelkar, Enterprise Architecture for Digital Business: Integrated Transformation Strategies, CRC Press, 2020. [68] O. Henfridsson, J. Nandhakumar, H. Scarbrough, and N. Panourgias, Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation, Inf. Org. 28 (2018), no. 2, 89–100. [69] S. Hielscher and A. Smith, Community-based digital fabrication workshops: A review of the research literature, SWPS 2014-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2742121, (2014). [70] D. Horvat, H. Kroll, and A. Jäger, Researching the effects of automation and digitalization on manufacturing companies’ productivity in the early stage of industry 4.0, Procedia Manufactur. 39 (2019), 886–893. [71] L. Ivancic, V.B. Vuksic, and M. Spremic, Mastering the digital transformation process: Business practices and lessons learned, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9 (2019), no. 2. [72] J.-S.R. Jang, Fuzzy modeling using generalized neural networks and Kalman filter algorithm, Proc. Ninth Nat. Conf. Artific. Intel. 2 (1991). [73] J.-S. Jang, ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 23 (1993), no. 3, 665–685. [74] R.D. Johnson and K. Diman, An investigation of the factors driving the adoption of cloud-based human resource information systems by small-and medium-sized businesses, T. Bondarouk, H.J.M. Ruel and E. Parry, (Eds.) Electronic HRM in the smart era, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017, pp. 1–31. [75] J. Joseph and V. Gaba, Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research, Acad. Manag. Annal. 14 (2020), no. 1, 267–302. [76] K.D. Joshi, L. Chi, A. Datta, and S. Han, Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities, Inf. Syst. Res. 21 (2010), no. 3, 472–495. [77] J. Kallinikos, A. Aaltonen, nd A. Marton, The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts, MIS Quart. 37 (2013), no. 2, 357–370. [78] D. Karaboga and E. Kaya, Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) training approaches: a comprehensive survey, Artif. Intell. Rev. 52 (2019), 2263–2293. [79] J. Keizer, A. Liang, G. Salokhe, and M. Sini, Towards an infrastructure for knowledge management within European Ethics: Methodologies for semantic integration of heterogeneous resources, FAO, 2005. [80] T. Komatsu, M. Salgado, A. Deserti, and F. Rizzo, Policy labs challenges in the public sector: The value of design for more responsive organizations, Policy Design Practice 4 (2021), no. 2, 271–291. [81] M. Kotarba, Digital transformation of business models, Found. Manag. 10 (2018), no. 1, 123–142. [82] T. Kretschmer and P. Khashabi, Digital transformation and organization design: An integrated approach, California Manag. Rev. 62 (2020), no. 4, 86–104. [83] C. Lee and L. Ma, The role of policy labs in policy experiment and knowledge transfer: A comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore, J. Compar. Policy Anal.: Res. Practice 22 (2020), no. 4, 281–297. [84] S. Leminen and M. Westerlund, Categorization of innovation tools in living labs, PhD. Thesis, Laurea University, 2017. [85] A. Lerro and G. Schiuma, Assessing performance and impact of the technological districts (TDs): General modelling and measurement system, Measur. Bus. Excel. 19 (2015), no. 3, 58–75. [86] M. Lewis and J. Moultrie, The organizational innovation laboratory, Creat. Innov. Manag. 14 (2005), no. 1, 73–83. [87] B. Lianto, M. Dachyar, and T.P. Soemardi, Continuous innovation: a literature review and future perspective, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 8 (2018), no. 3, 771–779. [88] L. Linde, D. Sjödin, V. Parida, and H. Gebauer, Evaluation of digital business model opportunities: A framework for avoiding digitalization traps, Res.-Technol. Manag. 64 (2020), no. 1, 43–53. [89] R. Linzalone, G. Schiuma, and S. Ammirato, Connecting universities with entrepreneurship through digital learning platform: Functional requirements and education-based knowledge exchange activities, Int. J. Entrepr. Behav. Res. 26 (2020), no. 7, 1525–1545. [90] J. Liu, H. Chang, J.Y.-L. Forrest, and B. Yang, Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of China’s manufacturing sectors, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158 (2020), p. 120142. [91] W. Magadley and K. Birdi, Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity, Creat. Innov. Manag. 18 (2009), no. 4, 315–325. [92] T.J. Marion and S.K. Fixson, The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development, J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 38 (2021), no. 1, 192–215. [93] M. McGann, T. Wells, and E. Blomkamp, Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving, Public Manag. Rev. 23 (2021), no. 2, 297–316. [94] A.B. Memon, K. Meyer, M. Thieme, and L.-P. Meyer, Inter-InnoLab collaboration: An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among innovation laboratories, J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 47 (2018), 1–21. [95] M. Meyer, J. Kuusisto, K. Grant, M. De Silva, S. Flowers, and U. Choksy, Towards new triple helix organisations? A comparative study of competence centres as knowledge, consensus and innovation spaces, R&D Manag. 49 (2019), no. 4, 555–573. [96] C. Møller, ERP II: A conceptual framework for next-generation enterprise systems?, J. Enterpr. Inf. Manag. 18 (2005), no. 4, 483–497. [97] J. Møller Jensen and T. Hansen, An empirical examination of brand loyalty, J. Prod. Brand Manag. 15 (2006), no. 7, 442–449. [98] S. Nambisan, Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation, Inf. Org. 28 (2018), no. 2, 104–106. [99] S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo, Digital innovation: towards a transdisciplinary perspective, Handbook of digital innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, pp. 2–12. [100] S. Nambisan, M. Wright, and M. Feldman, The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes, Res. Policy 48 (2019), no. 8, p. 103773. [101] S. Nascimento, Critical notions of technology and the promises of empowerment in shared machine shops, J. Peer Prod. 5 (2014), 1–4. [102] M. Nasiri, M. Saunila, J. Ukko, T. Rantala, and H. Rantanen, Shaping digital innovation via digital-related capabilities, Inf. Syst. Front. 25 (2023), no. 3, 1063–1080. [103] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Wise Company: How Companies Create Continuous Innovation, Oxford University Press, 2019. [104] M. Núñez-Merino, J.M. Maqueira-Marin, J. Moyano-Fuentes, and P.J. Martínez-Jurado, Information and digital technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean supply chain management: A systematic literature review, Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 (2020), no. 16, 5034–5061. [105] E. Ofek and M. Sarvary, R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products, Market. Sci. 22 (2003), no. 3, 355–370. [106] D.E. O’Leary, Artificial intelligence and big data, IEEE Intel. Syst. 28 (2013), no. 2, 96–99. [107] K. Olejniczak, S. Borkowska-Waszak, A. Domaradzka-Widła, and Y. Park, Policy labs: the next frontier of policy design and evaluation?, Policy Politics 48 (2020), no. 1, 89–110. [108] F. Osorio, L. Dupont, M. Camargo, P. Palominos, J.I. Peña, and M. Alfaro, Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool, Creat. Innov. Manag. 28 (2019), no. 1, 82–100. [109] A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, G. Bernarda, and A. Smith, Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want, John Wiley & Sons, 2015. [110] N. Pandey, P. Nayal, and A.S. Rathore, Digital marketing for B2B organizations: structured literature review and future research directions, J. Bus. Ind. Market. 35 (2020), no. 7, 1191–1204. [111] A. Panori, C. Kakderi, N. Komninos, K. Fellnhofer, A. Reid, and L. Mora, Smart systems of innovation for smart places: Challenges in deploying digital platforms for co-creation and data-intelligence, Land Use Policy 111 (2021), 104631. [112] M. Polk, Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving, Sustain. Sci. 9 (2014), 439–451. [113] A.B. Powell, Open culture and innovation: integrating knowledge across boundaries, Media Culture Soc. 37 (2015), no. 3, 376–393. [114] H. Preskill and T. Beer, Evaluating Social Innovation, Austrian Platform for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 2012. [115] P. Raja and B. Pahat, A review of training methods of ANFIS for applications in business and economics, Int. J. u-and e-Serv. Sci. Technol. 9 (2016), no. 7, 165–172. [116] A. Rangaswamy, N. Moch, C. Felten, G. Van Bruggen, J.E. Wieringa, and J. Wirtz, The role of marketing in digital business platforms, J. Interact. Market. 51 (2020), no. 1, 72–90. [117] M. Ringel, A. Taylor, and H. Zablit, The most innovative companies 2016, BCG reports, https://media-publications.bcg.com/MIC/BCG-Most-Innovative-Companies-2015-Nov-2015.pdf, 2016. [118] T. Ritter and C.L. Pedersen, Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future, Ind. Market. Manag. 86 (2020), 180–190. [119] S.J. Russell, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson Education, Inc., 2010. [120] F. Saadatmand, R. Lindgren, and U. Schultze, Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement, Res. Policy 48 (2019), no. 8, p. 103770. [121] T. Saarikko, U.H. Westergren and T. Blomquist, Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm, Bus. Hor. 63 (2020), no. 6, 825–839. [122] J.-M. Sahut, L. Iandoli, and F. Teulon, The age of digital entrepreneurship, Small Bus. Econ. 56 (2021), 1159–1169. [123] J. Sandberg, J. Holmström, and K. Lyytinen, Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: Evidence from the process automation industry, Manag. Inf. Syst. Quart. 44 (2020), no. 1, 129–153. [124] F. Santarsiero, A. Lerro, D. Carlucci, and G. Schiuma, Modelling and managing innovation lab as catalyst of digital transformation: Theoretical and empirical evidence, Measur. Bus. Excel. 26 (2022), no. 1, 81–92. [125] O. Schilke, On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism, Strat. Manag. J. 35 (2014), no. 2, 179–203. [126] G. Schiuma, Managing knowledge for business performance improvement, J. Knowledge Manag. 16 (2012), no. 4, 515–522. [127] S. Schmidt and V. Brinks, Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations, Creat. Innov. Manag. 26 (2017), no. 3, 291–299. [128] S. Schmidt, V. Brinks, and S. Brinkhoff, Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin: Organizing temporary spatial configurations for innovations, Z. Wirtsch. 58 (2014), no. 1, 232–247. [129] J.B. Schor, C. Fitzmaurice, L.B. Carfagna, W. Attwood-Charles, and E.D. Poteat, Paradoxes of openness and distinction in the sharing economy, Poetics 54 (2016), 66–81. [130] Y.R. Shrestha, S.M. Ben-Menahem, and G. Von Krogh, Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence, California Manag. Rev. 61 (2019), no. 4, 66–83. [131] A. Smith, S. Hielscher, S. Dickel, J. Söderberg, and E. van Oost, Grassroots digital fabrication and makerspaces: Reconfiguring, relocating and recalibrating innovation?, University of Sussex, SPRU Working Paper SWPS 2013-02, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731835, (2013). [132] M. Stacey, The FAB LAB network: A global platform for digital invention, education and entrepreneurship, Innov.: Technol. Govern. Glob. 9 (2014), no. 1–2, 221–238. [133] A. Ståhlbröst, A living lab as a service: Creating value for micro-enterprises through collaboration and innovation, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 3 (2013), no. 11. [134] T.J. Tanenbaum, A.M. Williams, A. Desjardins, and K. Tanenbaum, Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice, Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2013, pp. 2603–2612. [135] E. Tavoletti, N. Kazemargi, C. Cerruti, C. Grieco, and A. Appolloni, Business model innovation and digital transformation in global management consulting firms, Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 25 (2022), no. 6, 612–636. [136] A. Thorpe and S. Rhodes, The public collaboration lab: Infrastructuring redundancy with communities-in-place, She Ji: J. Design Econ. Innov. 4 (2018), no. 1, 60–74. [137] J. Tidd, The competence cycle: translating knowledge, In: From knowledge management to strategic competence: Measuring technological, market and organizational innovation, World Sci. 3 (2000), no. 1. [138] K. Timens and M. Gascó, Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference?, J. Urban Affairs 40 (2018), no. 7, 992–1008. [139] D. Tortora, R. Chierici, M.F. Briamonte and R. Tiscini, ‘I digitize so I exist’. Searching for critical capabilities affecting firms’ digital innovation, J. Bus. Res. 129 (2021), 193–204. [140] H. Torvinen and K. Jansson, Public health care innovation lab tackling the barriers of public sector innovation, Public Manag. Rev. 25 (2023), no. 8, 1539–1561. [141] G. Tsaramirsis, A. Kantaros, I. Al-Darraji, D. Pironnalis, C. Apostolopoulos, A. Pavlopoulou, M. Alrammal, Z. Ismail, S.M. Buhari, and M. Stojmenovic, A modern approach towards an industry 4.0 model: From driving technologies to management, J. Sensors 2022 (2022), 1–18. [142] R. Tucker, Starting an Innovation Lab? Avoid These Pitfalls, Forbes, 2017. [143] R. Van Goolen, H. Evers, and C. Lammens, International innovation labs: An innovation meeting ground between SMEs and business schools, Proc. Econ. Finance 12 (2014), 184–190. [144] R. Verganti, L. Vendraminelli, and M. Iansiti, Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence, J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 37 (2020), no. 3, 212–227. [145] P.C. Verhoef, T. Broekhuizen, Y. Bart, A. Bhattacharya, J.Q. Dong, N. Fabian, and M. Haenlein, Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda, J. Bus. Res. 122 (2021), 889–901. [146] S.-L. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. Fosso Wamba, J.R. Kala Kamdioug, and C.E. Tchatchouang Wanko, Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects, Bus. Process Manag. J. 26 (2020), no. 7, 1893–1924. [147] C. Wang, J. Hong, M. Kafouros, and M. Wright, Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies, J. Int. Bus. Stud. 43 (2012), 655–676. [148] K.S. Warner and M. Wäger, Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal, Long Range Plann. 52 (2019), no. 3, 326–349. [149] A. Whicher and T. Crick, Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation lab, Public Money Manag. 39 (2019), no. 4, 290–299. [150] Y. Wijngaarden, E. Hitters, and P.V. Bhansing, Cultivating fertile learning grounds: Collegiality, tacit knowledge and innovation in creative co-working spaces, Geoforum 109 (2020), 86–94. [151] S. Wildevuur, D. Van Dijk, T. Hammer-Jakobsen, M. Bjerre, A. Ayvari, and J. Lund, Connect: Design for an Eempathic Society, BIS Publishers, 2013. [152] B. Williamson, Governing methods: Policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education, Educ. Admin. History 47 (2015), no. 3, 251–271. [153] D. Witschel, A. Dohla, M. Kaiser, K.-I. Voigt, and T. Pfletschinger, Riding on the wave of digitization: Insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change, J. Bus. Econ. 89 (2019), 1023–1095. [154] Y. Yoo, The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research?, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14 (2013), no. 5, p. 227. [155] Y. Yoo, O. Henfridsson, and K. Lyytinen, Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research, Inf. Syst. Res. 21 (2010), no. 4, 724–735. [156] W. Yu, C.Y. Wong, R. Chavez, and M. Jacobs, Surfing with the tides: how digitalization creates firm performance through supply chain entrainment, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 43 (2023), no. 12, 2008–2030. [157] M. Zeschky, B. Wideningver and O. Gassmann, Frugal innovation in emerging markets, Res.-Technol. Manag. 54 (2011), no. 4, 38–45. [158] R. Zhao, X. Li, S. Joty, C. Qin, and L. Bing, Verify-and-edit: A knowledge-enhanced chain-of-thought framework, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03268, (2023). [159] C. Zurbriggen and M.G. Lago, An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government, Evidence Policy 15 (2019), no. 3, 437–451. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3 |
||