پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 22 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 705 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,146 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 71,451,333 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 63,174,267 |
ارائه چارچوبی برای توسعه مدلهای کسب و کار در اکوسیستم حمل و نقل برقی شهری | ||
| مدیریت زنجیره ارزش راهبردی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 3، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 8، اردیبهشت 1405، صفحه 23-52 اصل مقاله (741 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/svcm.2025.39797.1071 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| بهمن خداپناه* 1؛ محمد صارمی2؛ کیارش فرتاش3 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 2عضو هیات علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 30 آبان 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 27 آذر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 07 دی 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در بسیاری از کشورها از جمله ایران، بازار خودروهای برقی علیرغم یارانههای کلان و پیشرفتهای تکنولوژیکی، رشد چشمگیری نداشته است. دلیل اصلی این کندی، نبود مدلهای کسبوکار سودآور و مقیاسپذیر است که بتواند محدودیتهای برد کوتاه، زمان شارژ طولانی و هزینه اولیه بالا را به مزیت رقابتی تبدیل کند. مدلهای سنتی مبتنی بر فروش خودرو برای اکوسیستم برقی ناکارآمد بوده و با چالش کلاسیک «مرغ و تخممرغ» زیرساخت شارژ و تعداد خودرو مواجه هستند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارائه چارچوبی بومی برای توسعه مدلهای کسبوکار موفق در حملونقل برقی شهری ایران است. این تحقیق توسعهای-کیفی با روششناسی تئوری زمینهای انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل خبرگان صنعت خودروهای برقی، مدیران کسبوکار، سیاستگذاران و سرمایهگذاران بود. نمونهگیری به شیوه گلولهبرفی تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری (۱۸ نفر) ادامه یافت و دادهها از طریق مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته جمعآوری و با کدگذاری سهمرحلهای (باز، محوری، انتخابی) تحلیل شدند. یافتهها نشان داد که از ۱۱۳ کد باز، ۱۹ مقوله محوری استخراج و نهایتاً در مدل پارادایمی ششبعدی (عوامل علی، زمینهای، مداخلهگر، استراتژیها، پیامدها و پدیده مرکزی) سازماندهی شدند. نتایج تأکید میکند که موفقیت مدلهای جدید وابسته به گذار از یارانهمحوری به خدماتمحوری، بازطراحی پیشنهاد ارزش، تشکیل ائتلافهای چندجانبه و ارائه راهحل جامع جابهجایی الکتریکی (خودرو + شارژ هوشمند + اشتراک باتری + خدمات اشتراکی) است. چارچوب ارائهشده بهعنوان نقشه راه عملیاتی برای سیاستگذاران، خودروسازان و سرمایهگذاران ایرانی در مسیر تحقق حملونقل پاک شهری قابل استفاده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| خودرو برقی؛ مدل کسب و کار؛ حمل و نقل شهری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Providing A Framework For Developing Business Models In The Urban Electric Transportation Ecosystem | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Bahman khodapanah1؛ Mohammadsadegh Saremi2؛ Kiyarash Fartash3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Business management, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 2Faculty member at Technology Studies Institute | ||
| 3Research Fellow, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In many countries, including Iran, the electric vehicle market has not grown significantly despite large subsidies and technological advances. The main reason for this slowdown is the lack of profitable and scalable business models that can turn the limitations of short range, long charging time, and high initial cost into a competitive advantage. Traditional models based on car sales are inefficient for the electric ecosystem and face the classic “chicken and egg” challenge of charging infrastructure and vehicle numbers. The aim of this study is to provide an indigenous framework for developing successful business models in urban electric transportation in Iran. This developmental-qualitative research was conducted with a grounded theory methodology. The statistical population included electric vehicle industry experts, business managers, policymakers, and investors. Snowball sampling continued until theoretical saturation (18 people) was reached, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed with three-stage coding (open, axial, selective). The findings showed that 19 core categories were extracted from 113 open codes and were finally organized into a six-dimensional paradigmatic model (causal, contextual, intervening factors, strategies, consequences, and central phenomenon). The results emphasize that the success of new models depends on the transition from subsidy-oriented to service-oriented, redesigning the value proposition, forming multi-stakeholder coalitions, and providing a comprehensive electric mobility solution (vehicle + smart charging + battery sharing + shared services). The presented framework can be used as an operational roadmap for Iranian policymakers, automakers, and investors on the path to realizing clean urban transportation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Electric vehicle, business model, urban transportation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References
Albatayneh, A. (2024). Electric cars in Jordan: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Research, 4(3), 8-12. DOI:10.53375/ijecer.2024.414
Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
Akinsooto, O., Ogunnowo, E., & Ezeanochie, C. (2025). The future of electric vehicles: Technological innovations and market trends. Engineering and Technology Journal, 10(4), 4392–4405. DOI:10.47191/etj/v10i04.04
Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bakhshizadeh Borj, K., Hamzavi, H., & Jamali, M. (2025). Identifying and prioritizing drivers for optimizing the sustainable value chain of Iran's petrochemical industry with a strategic foresight approach. Strategic Value Chain Management, 1(3), 1-.doi10.22075/SVCM.2025.36996.1024
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2014). Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research policy, 43(2), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.014
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714
Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529
Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 227-246.
Geels, F. (2018). Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 224–231. DOI:10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
Geels, F., Kern, F., & Clark, W. (2023). Sustainability transitions in consumption-production systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(47), Article e2310070120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310070120
Geels, F., Sovacool, B., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463–479. DOI:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018
Halpin, S. (2024). Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: Considerations for its use. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 23–43. DOI:10.29333/ajqr/14887
Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., & Axsen, J. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 5–25. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 57–68.
Kley, F., Lerch, C., & Dallinger, D. (2011). New business models for electric cars—A holistic approach. Energy policy, 39(6), 3392-3403. https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-294956
Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763
Latif, W. B., & Yasin, I. M. (2025). The evolution of business models: How innovation is redefining strategic success. Pacific Journal of Business Innovation and Strategy, 2(2), 1-4. DOI:10.70818/pjbis.2025.v02i02.039
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.
Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072
Musundire, A. (2025). Understanding the Research Onion and Its Application in Educational Leadership and Management Research: Making Use of Saunders' Research Model. In Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Management (pp. 355-384). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. DOI:10.4018/979-8-3693-9425-0.ch015
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Designing business models and similar strategic objects: The contribution of IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), Article 5.
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00333
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125
Rachinger, M., & Müller, J. M. (2024). Investigating a manufacturing ecosystem in transition toward electric vehicles–a business model perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(9), 24-50 https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2023-0279
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042
Sterk, F., Stocker, A., Heinz, D., & Weinhardt, C. (2024). Unlocking the value from car data: A taxonomy and archetypes of connected car business models. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 13.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
UNDP. (2018). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals
Wells, C., Sah, P., Moghadas, S., & Pandey, A. (2020). Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13), 7504–7509. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002616117
Ziegler, D., & Abdelkafi, N. (2022). Business models for electric vehicles: Literature review and key insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, Article 129803. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129803
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311406265
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 120 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 47 |
||