| In the present era, where environmental issues have become one of the most critical global challenges, analyzing the discourse of classical literature from the perspective of ecolinguistics can open a new window to understanding human-nature interactions and rethinking environmental perspectives. Therefore, this research seeks to answer the following question: What is the frequency of “the stories we live by” in nature-oriented couplets of Sa’adi's sonnets? The answer to this question is based on the eight stories proposed by Stibbe (2021); framing, metaphors, evaluations, identities, convictions, erasure, salience, and narratives. The current research is both quantitative and qualitative and follows a descriptive approach. Out of 6,293 couplets from the sonnets, sourced from complete works of Sa’adi, edited and published by the late Mohammad Ali Foroughi (2004), thirty-five couplets specifically concern nature and its elements. All these thirty-five couplets have been analyzed within the framework of Stibbe’s (2021) model. However, due to research limitations, only six samples are presented in this study, while the rest of the data analysis is reported in general terms. The fifth section discusses the percentage of occurrence and statistical analysis of the stories proposed by Stibbe. The findings reveal that the following frequency of the analyzed stories in Sa’adi’s nature-oriented couplets in a descending order: salience, evaluation, erasure, framing, narrative, metaphor, conviction, and identity. Among these, the salience story occurs most frequently, with 87 instances (37.35%), while the identity story appears least frequently, with only 2 instances (0.81%). The high frequency of the salience story indicates Sa’adi’s profound perspective on the relationship between humans and their environment, wherein nature serves as a reflection of his emotions, experiences, and moral teachings. Conversely, the low frequency of the identity story suggests that Sa’adi predominantly describes nature from his individual perspective rather than from a collective or societal viewpoint. As a result, the pronoun "we" is rarely used in nature descriptions, replaced instead by other pronouns or impersonal descriptions. The depiction of nature in Sa’adi’s sonnets is not limited to showcasing the world's beauty; rather, it reflects his deep insight into the philosophy of life, ethics, and wisdom. Thus, in Sa’adi’s sonnets, nature is a dynamic and meaningful element that transcends simple imagery, serving as a mirror to worldview, emotions, and life wisdom. |
- Blackmore, E. and Holmes, T. (2013). Common cause for nature: values and frames in conservation. Machynlleth, Wales: Public Interest Research Centre. Available from: http://valuesandframes.org/resources/CCF_report_common_cause_for_ nature_full_report.pdf.
- Chen, S. (2016). “Language and ecology: A content analysis of ecolinguistics as an emerging research field”, Ampersand, 3, 108-116.
- Goatly, A. )2000(. Critical reading and writing: an introductory coursebook. London: Routledge.
- Haugen, E.)1972(. The ecology of language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). “New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to Applied Linguistics”, Journal of Applied Linguistics, no. 6.
- Jismulatif, Dahnilsyah and Mangatur Sinaga (2020). “An Ecolinguistics Analysis of Indonesian Pop Music Lyrics on Environment: A Review of Two Nature Songs”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655, 1-6.
- Jabbar Rasheed, N. (2023). “Language Ecology or Ecolinguistics: Conceptual and Theoretical Discussions”, Department of English, College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad, 34(1), 1-9.
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ma, CH and Stibbe, A. (2022). “The search for new stories to live by: A summary of ten ecolinguistics lectures delivered by Arran Stibbe”. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 164–187.
- Martin, J. and Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Bloomsbury.
- Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodal introduction. London: Sage publications.
- Martin, J. and White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage Publications.
- Sapir, E. (1912). “Language and Environment”, American Anthropologist. 14(2), 226-242.
- Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by (2nd. ed.), London: Routledge.
- Toolan, M.J. (2001). Narrative: a critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.
- van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Foroughi, M. A. (2004). The complete works of Saʿdi. Edited by B. Khorramshahi. Tehran: Doostan. [In Persian]
- Ghorbanpour, A. (2022). A review of the book Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 22(6), 107–121. [In Persian]
- Mehrnia, S. (2021). An ecolinguistic discourse analysis of the Persian translation of Parts 15 and 30 of the Holy Qur’an. Unpublished master’s thesis, Semnan University. [In Persian]
- Mirsaeedi, A. S. (2016). Traces of green language in Persian poetry: An ecolinguistic study. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applied Research in Language Studies. Tehran: Nikan Institute of Higher Education. [In Persian]
- Moshtagh-Mehr, R., & Fayzi, A. (2018). An analysis of ecolinguistic elements in mystical texts with reference to the works of Bahaʾ al-Walad, Rumi, and Baqli Shirazi. Journal of Persian Language and Literature, University of Tabriz, 71(237), 185–209. [In Persian]
- Parsapur, Z. (2012a). Examining the relationship between humans and nature in poetry. Journal of Persian Literature, 1(2), 77–99. [In Persian]
- Parsapur, Z. (2012b). Ecocriticism: A new approach in literary criticism. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Literary Criticism, 5(19), 7–26. [In Persian]
- Razavian, H., & Tamanna Elahipanah, T. (2023). An ecolinguistic perspective on the works of Moradi Kermani. Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, Semnan University, 14(33), 213–248. [In Persian]
- Samiei Gilani, A. (1996). The depiction of nature in Persian lyrical poetry. Nameh-ye Farhangestan, (8), 118. [In Persian]
- Stibbe, A. (2016). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (Trans. under the supervision of F. Aghagolzadeh). Tehran: Neyeseh-ye Parsi. [In Persian]
- Vaisi, A. (2007). The etymology of the words water, fire, and wind in Iranian culture and literature from an ecolinguistic perspective. Payk-e Noor, 5(3), 70–80.[In Persian]
|
