پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 22 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 709 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,213 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 71,680,434 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 63,496,597 |
Exploring the relationship between the professional thinking of auditors and ambidexterity with team psychological empowerment | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 بهمن 1404 اصل مقاله (620.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33948.5069 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdul Majid Kurd1؛ Mansour Garkaz* 1؛ Alireza Maetoofi1؛ Ali Khozain1؛ Alireza Hassan Maleki2 | ||
| 1Department of Accounting, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 11 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 تیر 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The current study aimed to examine the relationship between the professional thinking of auditors and ambidexterity with team psychological empowerment. The statistical population of the qualitative part of the study includes 15 experts of university professors in the research field selected in a non-random and purposeful sampling method in 2023. Furthermore, in the quantitative part of the study, the statistical population encompasses the Iranian Association members of certified public accountants, who were selected using the available sampling method as 297 people. The data collection instrument included a questionnaire whose structure was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis in Smart pls software, and reliability was verified using Cronbach's alpha coefficient in SPSS software and composite reliability. To analyze the data, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests have resorted to the normality test, the Friedman test for prioritizing components and indicators, and the structural equation modelling test for path analysis and model validation in Smart pls software. The relationship between the dimensions and components of professional thinking and ambidexterity, as well as the relationship between the dimensions and components of professional thinking and empowerment, are the most critical findings of the study. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| professional thinking؛ psychological empowerment؛ grounded theory approach | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] K.M. Alneadi, M.J. Almatrooshi, G.S. Khalifa, S.A. El-Aidie, B. Alhaj, and M. Morsy, Linking knowledge-oriented leadership and innovation towards organizational performance, Acad. Leadership 21 (2020), no. 4, 107–118.
[2] M.A. Bagherpour Velashani, R. Zamani and M. Moradi, The effect of internal locus of control on the relationship between psychological empowerment auditor and audit quality, J. Audit Sci. 36 (2022), no. 22(1), 119–135.
[3] Y. Bai, P. Harms, G. Han, and W. Cheng, Good and bad simultaneously? Leaders using dialectical thinking foster positive conflict and employee performance, Int. J. Conflict Manag. 26 (2015), no. 3, 245–267.
[4] S. Baškarada, J. Watson, and J. Cromarty, Leadership and organizational ambidexterity, J. Manag. Dev. 35 (2016), no. 6, 778–788.
[5] N. Coleman, An exploration of the leadership behaviors and ambidexterity in online learning units, Doctor of Education Thesis, The Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Gorge Washington University, 2016.
[6] J.A. Conger and R.N. Kanungo, The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice, Acad. Manag. Rev. 13 (1988), no. 3, 471–482.
[7] L.E. DeAngelo, Auditor size and audit quality, J. Account. Econ. 3 (1981), no. 3, 183–199.
[8] M.J. Donate and J.D. Sánchez de Pablo, The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation, J. Bus. Res. 68 (2015), no. 2, 360–370.
[9] M. Hakak, A. Shariat Nezhad, and A. Saedi, Identifying managers' mental patterns in relation to psychological empowerment of employees, using the Q-method, Scie. Article Ministry Sci. Manag. Dev. Process 30 (2017), no. 2 (100 consecutive), 145–161.
[10] G. Han, Y. Bai, and G. Peng, Creating team ambidexterity: The effects of leader dialectical thinking and collective team identification, Eur. Manag. J. 40 (2022), no. 2, 175–181.
[11] C.M. Hui, H.K. Fok, and M.H. Bond, Who feels more ambivalence? Linking dialectical thinking to mixed emotions, Person. Indiv. Differ. 46 (2009), no. 4, 493–498.
[12] M. Ilani Hajiklai, Effect of ethical leadership on the path of career development of employees, with the mediating role of psychological empowerment in the Red Crescent population of Mazandaran province, New Res. Approach. Manage. Sci. 4 (2020), no. 17, 73–94.
[13] B.L. Kirkman and B. Rosen, Powering up teams, Organ. Dyn. 28 (2000), no. 3.
[14] H. Mehr Thabet, Investigation of the empowerment and psychological skills of employees with the influence of innovative transformational leadership, case study: Deeds and Properties Registration Organisation of Iran, New Mode. Bus. Manag. 14 (2021).
[15] A.K. Mishra and G.M. Spreitzer, Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign, Acad. Manag. Rev. 23 (1998), no. 3, 567–588.
[16] S. Mohammadi, M. Nadaf, and F. Mosavi, Explaining the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity (exploration and exploitation) in the impact of transformational leadership on entrepreneurial awareness (case study: one of the subsidiaries of the National Company of Southern Oil Regions), Sci. J. Expl. Prod. Oil Gas 2020 (2020), no. 178, 19–28. [In Persian]
[17] M. Niazi and M. Karkonan Nasrabadi, Empowerment based on social capital strategy, Tadbir (2009), no. 203, 11–17.
[18] M. Rezaei Jandani, R. Hoveyda, and H. Samavatiyan, Concept of psychological empowerment and its relationship with psychological capital among teachers, New Educ. Approach. 10 (2015), no. 1, 21–76.
[19] R.A. Royaei, K. Javidi, G. Talebnia, and B. Bani Mahd, Investigating the effect of interpretive thinking on the auditor's judgment and decision-making: Based on the theory of interpretation level of psychological distance, Financ. Account. Quart. 11(2017), no. 39, 141–169.
[20] S. Safdari, B. Ghorbani, and S.A. Mousavi, The effect of audit firm characteristics on empowerment of managers of companies, Manag. Account. Stud. Quart. 3 (2016), no. 2, 251–262.
[21] A. Shahabi Nasab, M. Bahrami, A. Pirzad, and S. Hojjat Doust, The effect of quantum management skills in the formation of innovative work behavior by relying on the mediating role of psychological empowerment and knowledge management: A case study, Account. Manag. Persp. Quart. 4 (2021), no. 83.
[22] K.W. Thomas and B.A. Velthouse, Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation, Acad. Manag. Rev. 15 (1990), no. 4, 666–681.
[23] D.A. Whetten and K.S. Cameron, Characteristics of Effective Organizations, National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC. 1984.
[24] M. Yazdan-Shenas and M. Hashempour, The effect of strategic thinking components on employees' psychological empowerment; case study: University of Medical Sciences and Healthcare Services of Qom province, 4th Nat. Conf. 2nd Inte. Conf. Account. Manag. 2014. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 52 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 66 |
||