پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 688 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 71,005,669 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 62,459,401 |
Impact of rigid and semi-rigid connections on dual-steel frames with various bracing systems using non-linear dynamic analysis | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 43، آبان 2026 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2025.2442 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hossein Khosravi* 1؛ Mahdiye Shahri2؛ Mohammad Bahram3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Civil Engineering, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 21 شهریور 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آذر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 02 دی 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| During the occurrence of various earthquakes, the formation of local cracks in the connections of the steel frames is regarded as a main problem. Hence, scholars have paid a special attention to the application of steel frames with semi-rigid connections. So far, the frames with semi-rigid connections are rarely utilized, which is mainly due to their high drift rate. In the present article, the impact of semi-rigid connections on the dual-steel frames with various bracing systems was assessed using non-linear dynamic analysis. For accomplishing the analysis, the PERFORM 3D Software was used and the bilinear models were used for modelling the behavior of frames' members. The parameters investigated include maximum base shear, period, frames' drift and energy depreciation of dual systems. The obtained results indicated that the semi-rigid connections lead to decrease in the base shear, while the braces of dual system compensate the increase of drift resulted from utilization of semi-rigid connections. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Semi-rigid Connections؛ Dual Systems؛ Non-linear Dynamic Analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Patnana V, Vyavahare AY. Moment rotation curves for semi rigid connections. 2016 Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Optim. Tech., 2016, p. 2563–8.
[2] Feizi MG, Mojtahedi A, Nourani V. Effect of semi-rigid connections in improvement of seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames. Steel Compos Struct 2015;19:467–84.
[3] Najdian M, Izadinia M. Evaluation of seismic behavior on steel frames with TSW semi-rigid connections under the nonlinear time history analysis. Appl Mech Mater 2012;166:2083–7.
[4] Dubina D, Stratan A, De Matteis G, Landolfo R. Seismic performance of dual steel moment-resisting frames. 2021.
[5] Popa AG, Mathe AE. Performance--based analysis of steel structures with semi-rigid connections. Proc 34th IABSE Symp “Large Struct Ans Infrastructures Environ Constrained Urban Areas” 2010:356–7.
[6] Standardization EC for. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures 2002.
[7] Uang CM, Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1990;19:77–90.
[8] Rigi A, JavidSharifi B, Hadianfard MA, Yang TY. Study of the seismic behavior of rigid and semi-rigid steel moment-resisting frames. J Constr Steel Res 2021;186:106910.
[9] Farajian M, Kildashti K, Sharafi P, Eslamnia H. Quantification of seismic performance factors for modular corner-supported steel bracing system. Structures 2022;45:257–74.
[10] Lotfollahi M, Alinia MM, Taciroglu E. Development of Improved Criteria for the Balanced Design of X-braced Moment Resisting Frame Systems. J Build Eng 2025:113158.
[11] Barbagallo F, Bosco M, Marino EM, Rossi PP. Seismic design and performance of dual structures with BRBs and semi-rigid connections. J Constr Steel Res 2019;158:306–16.
[12] E E. Location of semi-rigid connections effect on the seismic performance of steel frame structures. Electron J Struct Eng 2022;22:1–10.
[13] Baiguera M, Vasdravellis G, Karavasilis TL. Dual seismic-resistant steel frame with high post-yield stiffness energy-dissipative braces for residual drift reduction. J Constr Steel Res 2016;122:198–212.
[14] Pirmoz A, Liu MM. Direct displacement-based seismic design of semi-rigid steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 2017;128:201–9.
[15] Nouri Y, Jouneghani HG, Shirkhani A, Hemati E, Hemati SA, Hajirasouliha I. Seismic retrofit of steel moment frames with arc and ring yielding dampers: A probabilistic loss assessment using FEMA P-58. Structures 2025;76:108898.
[16] Nouri Y, Shirkhani A, Jouneghani HG, Hemati E, De Domenico D. Seismic performance assessment of steel MRFs retrofitted with arc and ring dampers. J Constr Steel Res 2026;236:109949.
[17] Inc Computer and Structures. Manual of PERFORM-3D Version 5.0.0 2011.
[18] DC CC of. Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3-D structures (PERFORM-3D) n.d.
[19] FE P. commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA356). Washington, DC Fed Emerg Manag Agency 2000;7:518.
[20] Khosravi H, Hejazi Y, Mousavi SS. Analysis of supported steel frames with rigid and semi-rigid connections. Gradevinar 2017;69:131–9. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 15 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7 |
||