پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 22 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 717 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,292 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 72,190,253 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 63,930,734 |
Evaluation and selection of suppliers in a supply chain based on multi-criteria decision-making model using fuzzy TOPSIS | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 26 تیر 1405 اصل مقاله (1016.08 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.36006.5338 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mehdi Vafaei* 1؛ Abolfazl Paymozd2؛ Soheil Mesbah3 | ||
| 1Department of Management and Engineering, Alborz Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Management, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 3Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 مهر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 01 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 آذر 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In supply chain management, selecting suitable suppliers is a necessary strategic decision. Making these decisions is a complex process due to certain uncertain parameters, such as future demand. In this regard, the present study aims to evaluate and select suppliers in a supply chain based on a multi-criteria decision-making model using fuzzy TOPSIS. The research population consisted of experts from the purchasing and material supply unit in the detergent industry, who were selected using a purposive sampling method. According to them, the criteria for selecting suppliers were identified and weighted. The criteria were identified based on library studies and finalized with the experts' approval, and were then transformed into a pairwise comparison questionnaire. Within the framework of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the opinions of the experts regarding the priority of the criteria were assessed using MATLAB software. By forming the decision-making matrix and using the fuzzy TOPSIS method, the final prioritization of the criteria was obtained. Based on the findings of the research, the criteria and sub-criteria for evaluating suppliers were classified into 4 main criteria (quality, protective, security, economic, and technical) and 28 sub-criteria. Quality factors were deemed the most important, followed by protective and security, technical, and economic criteria. Performance evaluation of each supplier group using the fuzzy TOPSIS method indicated that group A2 had the highest priority, followed by groups A4, A3, and A1 in that order. From the obtained results, it can be stated that the use of the fuzzy TOPSIS model is appropriate for the problem of supplier selection, especially in the final stage. Therefore, providing a flexible and cost-effective tool for supplier selection enables procurement managers to make quick decisions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| supplier selection؛ multi-criteria decision making؛ hierarchical process؛ fuzzy TOPSIS | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] N. Agrawal, Multi‑criteria decision‑making toward supplier selection: Exploration of PROMETHEE II method, Benchmark.: Int. J. 29 (2002), no. 7, 2122-2146. [2] A. Aktepe and S. Ersoz, A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for supplier selection and a case study, Int. J. Engin. Res. Dev. 3 (2011), no. 1, 33-36. [3] T. Allehashemi, S.H. Amin, and S. Zolfaghari, A proposed multi‑objective model for cellphone closed‑loop supply chain optimization based on fuzzy QFD, Expert Syst. Appl. 210 (2022), 118577. [4] M. Arabi, M. Zarei, and A.A. Abbasi, Selecting a Sustainable Supplier Using a Multi‑Criteria Decision‑Making Approach, First Nat. Conf. Transform. Manag., Shiraz, 2021. [5] O. Boyerhosni and A. Kazemi, Supplier evaluation and selection in a supply chain based on combined multi‑criteria decision‑making methods and sensitivity analysis, First Int. Conf. Manag. Capabil. Ind. Engin. Account. Economics, Babol, 2022. [6] K.H. Chang, A novel enhanced supplier selection method used for handling hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Math. Prob. Engin. 2022 (2022), no. 1, 6621236. [7] Z. Chen and W. Yang, An MAGDM based on constrained FAHP and FTOPSIS and its application to supplier selection, Math. Comput. Modell. 54 (2011), no. 11-12, 2802-2815. [8] Z. Ebrahim Qazvini, A. Haji, and H. Mina, A fuzzy solution approach to supplier selection and order allocation in green supply chain considering the location‑routing problem, Sci. Iran. 28 (2021), no. 1, 446-464. [9] H.E. Evcioglu and M. Kabak, Supplier selection in supply chain network using MCDM methods, Sigma J. Engin. Natur. Sci. 41 (2023), no. 1, 1-16. [10] J. Feng and Z. Gong, Integrated linguistic entropy weight method and multi‑objective programming model for supplier selection and order allocation in a circular economy: A case study, J. Cleaner Prod. 277 (2020), 122597. [11] S.K. Ghosh, N. Zoha, and F. Sarwar, A generic MCDM model for supplier selection for multiple decision makers using fuzzy TOPSIS, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Engin. Res. Innov. Educ., Sylhet, Bangladesh, 2019, pp. 833-840. [12] A.N. Haddad, B.B. da Costa, L.S. de Andrade, A. Hammad, and C.A. Soares, Application of fuzzy‑TOPSIS method in supporting supplier selection with focus on HSE criteria: A case study in the oil and gas industry, Infrastructures 6 (2021), no. 8, 105. [13] N. Jain and A.R. Singh, Sustainable supplier selection under must‑be criteria through Fuzzy inference system, J. Cleaner Prod. 248 (2020), 119275. [14] F.R.L. Junior, L. Osior, and L.C.R. Carpinetti, A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, Appl. Soft Comput. 21 (2014), 194-209. [15] M. Keyghobadi, S.H.R. Shahabi, and M. Seif, Application of MCDM methods in managerial decisions for identifying and evaluating future options: A real case study in shipbuilding industry, J. Ind. Syst. Engin. 13 (2020), 262-286. [16] K. Khulud, I. Masudin, F. Zulfikarijah, D.P. Restuputri, and A. Haris, Sustainable supplier selection through multi‑criteria decision making (MCDM) approach: A bibliometric analysis, Logistics 7 (2023), no. 4, 96. [17] H.S. Kilic and A.S. Yalcin, Modified two‑phase fuzzy goal programming integrated with IF‑TOPSIS for green supplier selection, Appl. Soft Comput. 93 (2020), 106371. [18] W.Y. Leong, K.Y. Wong, and W.P. Wong, A new integrated multi‑criteria decision‑making model for resilient supplier selection, Appl. Syst. Innov. 5 (2022), no. 1, 8. [19] J. Li, H. Fang, and W. Song, Sustainable supplier selection based on SSCM practices: A rough cloud TOPSIS approach, J. Cleaner Prod. 222 (2019), 606-621. [20] A. Liu, Y. Xiao, H. Lu, S.B. Tsai, and W. Song, A fuzzy three‑stage multi‑attribute decision‑making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection, J. Cleaner Prod. 239 (2019), 118043. [21] S. Luthra, K. Govindan, D. Kannan, S.K. Mangla, and C.P. Garg, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, J. Cleaner Prod. 140 (2017), 1686-1698. [22] M. Mahdavi, M. Mahmoudzadeh, and T.L. Olsen, Efficient vs. responsive supplier selection for functional and innovative products: A quantitative study, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 255 (2023), 108656. [23] Z. Mohammadi, M. Malekzadeh, M. Salar, R. Ghafarian, and S. Shahmiri, Supplier selection using the fuzzy multi‑criteria decision‑making approach in service companies, 17th Nat. Conf. Civil Engin. Architect. Urban Plann., Shirvan, 2021. [24] V. Nemati Abuzar and M.A. Beheshtinia, Combining methods of fuzzy hierarchical analysis process and fuzzy TOPSIS for selecting suppliers (case study: advertising company), J. Model. Engin. 15 (2016), no. 48, 217-230. [25] A. Rasmussen, H. Sabic, S. Saha, and I.E. Nielsen, Supplier selection for aerospace and defense industry through MCDM methods, Cleaner Engin. Technol. 12 (2023), 100590. [26] B. Sahin, T.L. Yip, P.H. Tseng, M. Kabak, and A. Soylu, An application of a fuzzy TOPSIS multi‑criteria decision analysis algorithm for dry bulk carrier selection, Information 11 (2020), no. 5, 251. [27] A.K. Sahu, S. Datta, and S.S. Mahapatra, Evaluation and selection of resilient suppliers in fuzzy environment: Exploration of fuzzy‑VIKOR, Benchmark.: Int. J. 23 (2016), no. 3, 651-673. [28] A. Sattari, Supplier evaluation and selection using multi‑criteria decision analysis methods, a case study of a wire and cable manufacturing plant, 20th Nat. Conf. Ind. Engin. Stud., Isfahan, 2022. [29] S. Soygider and E. Gecer, Application of multi‑criteria decision‑making methods in supplier selection, J. Optim. Decision Mak. 2 (2023), no. 2, 349-356. [30] R. Sufi Fard, Gh. Asili, and A. Nazeri, Evaluation and selection of suppliers in the military supply chain and order allocation by multi‑objective particle swarm optimization algorithm, Third Int. Conf. Dyn. Manag. Account. Audit., Tehran, 2017. [31] H. Taherdoost and A. Brard, Analyzing the process of supplier selection criteria and methods, Procedia Manufact. 32 (2019), 1024-1034. [32] C.N. Wang, V.T.H. Viet, T.P. Ho, V.T. Nguyen, and V.T. Nguyen, Multi‑criteria decision model for the selection of suppliers in the textile industry, Symmetry 12 (2020), no. 6, 979. [33] C.M. Yu, K.S. Chen, K.K. Lai, and C.H. Hsu, Fuzzy supplier selection method based on smaller‑the‑better quality characteristic, Appl. Sci. 10 (2020), no. 10, 3635. [34] C. Yu, Y. Shao, K. Wang, and L. Zhang, A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval‑valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Appl. 121 (2019), 1-17. [35] H. Zamani‑Sabzi, J.P. King, C.C. Gard, and S. Abudu, Statistical and analytical comparison of multi‑criteria decision‑making techniques under fuzzy environment, Oper. Res. Perspect. 3 (2016), 92-117. [36] L.J. Zhang, R. Liu, H.C. Liu, and H. Shi, Green supplier evaluation and selections: A state‑of‑the‑art literature review of models, methods, and applications, Math. Prob. Engin. 2020 (2020), no. 1, 1783421. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||