Interaction of causes of blood money | ||
| مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی | ||
| Article 8, Volume 8, Issue 14, June 2016, Pages 195-214 PDF (178.33 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1953 | ||
| Receive Date: 28 January 2017, Revise Date: 17 June 2026, Accept Date: 28 January 2017 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The important question regarding such cases is if the sum of such amounts should be paid as blood money (Non-Interaction Theory) or payment of the largest of such amounts releases the perpetrator of liability for blood money (Interaction Theory). jurists consensually believe that when several bodily harms have been caused by one single strike and such harms have led to the death of victim, blood money of members and profits overlap with blood money for death. If this situation happen by numerous consecutive strikes, interaction prevails over. Of course, if numerous strikes inter with time space and well- being between them, non- interaction theory prevails over. In this case custom invocation homicide to strikes appoint interaction or non- interaction. In all of cases in doubt non- interaction is a principle. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Interaction; blood money; Felony; Non-Interaction principle | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,048 PDF Download: 1,572 |
||