Historical misunderstanding the issue of singing (according to the theory of Sheikh Ansari) | ||
| مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی | ||
| Article 4, Volume 8, Issue 15, December 2016, Pages 81-108 PDF (199.28 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22075/feqh.2017.1959 | ||
| Receive Date: 28 January 2017, Revise Date: 17 June 2026, Accept Date: 28 January 2017 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The theme of the triple concepts like playing (Qena), frivolous voice (Lahvi voice) and singing have an essential role in the determination of their religious order and edict. In this paper, the Levy singing sound given over sin and minstrel's song voice introduced to the issue of religious veneration and lahvy Play only use in specific instances, such as forbidden gambling in the religion. Also the author prove that absolute prohibition of immoral and frivolous singing means singing voice commensurate with frivolous gatherings is not fixed in the Islamic law. In this regard, the author uncovered the historical misconception that the expression of Sheikh Ansari occurred in the song issue and believe that he just focused on the minstrel's song (not lahvy voices) as the subject of playing(Qena). Finally the author believe that forbidden playing is not accompanied with the lahvy voices according to it's famous meaning. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| playing voice (Qena); sound frivolous(Lahv); Semantic; Sheikh Ansari | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,706 PDF Download: 1,656 |
||