Comparative Review of the Performance Based Design of Building Structures Using Static Non-Linear Analysis, Part B: R/C Frames

[1] Fajfar, P., Fischinger, M. “N2 – A Method for Non-Linear Seismic Analysis of Regular Buildings”. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, 1988, Vol.5, 111-116, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan.

[2]     EC 8, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings; CEN, Brussels, 2003.

[3] Cesar, M.B., Barros, R.C., “Estudo Preliminar sobre o Desempenho Sísmico de Pórticos Metálicos Contraventados a partir de Análises Estáticas Não-Lineares (Pushover)”; Proceedings of ‘Métodos Numéricos e Computacionais em Engenharia CMNE 2007 e XXVIII CILAMCE’, Congresso Ibero Latino-Americano sobre Métodos Computacionais em Engenharia, FEUP, Porto, 13-15 Junho 2007; CMNE/CILAMCE 2007, Paper 1184 – pp. 1-18; Edts: A. Rodriguez-Ferran, Javier Olivier, Paulo R.M. Lyra, José L.D. Alves; APMTAC / SEMNI, 2007.

[4] Cesar, M.B., Barros, R.C., “Seismic Performance of Metallic Braced Frames by Pusho-ver Analyses”, Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engi-neering (COMPDYN 2009), M. Papadrakakis, N.D. Lagaros, M. Fragiadakis (eds.), Rhodes, Greece, 22–24 June 2009.

[5] Pereira, V.G., Barros, R.C. and Cesar, M.B., “A Parametric Study of a R/C Frame Based on Pushover Analysis”, 3rd International Conference on Integrity, Reliability & Failure (IRF 2009), J.F. Silva Gomes and S.A. Meguid (eds.), Porto, Portugal, 20-24 July 2009.

[6] Pereira, V.G., Barros, R.C. and Cesar, M.B., “Pushover Analyses of a R/C Frame by distinct Software”, 12th International Conference on the Enhancement and Promotion of Computational Methods in Engineering and Science (EPMESC XII), Hong-Kong and Macao, 30 Nov–3 Dec 2009.

[7] Elghazouli, A.Y. (editor), “Seismic Design of Buildings to Eurocode 8”, Spon Press, Abingdon, Oxon, UK, 2009.

[8] FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency, “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”, FEMA-273; “NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”, FEMA-274; Washington, D.C., 1997.

[9] R.F. Almeida, R.C. Barros, “A new multimode load pattern for pushover analysis: the effect of higher modes of vibration”, Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures IV, Eds.: G. Latini and C.A. Brebbia, WIT Press, (2003), U.K., pp. 3-13.

[10] R. C. Barros, R. Almeida, “Pushover analysis of asymmetric three-dimensional buildings frames”, Journal Civil Engineering & Management, Vol. XI, Number 1, pp. 3-12, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2005.

[11] Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K., “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings”, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 33: 903–927, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.

[12] H.N. Li, G. Li, Simplified method for pushover curves of asymmetric structure with dis-placement dependent passive energy dissipation devices, Advances in Structural Engi-neering, Vol. 10, Issue 5, (2007), 537-649.

[13] G. Li, H.N. Li, Direct displacement-based design for buildings with passive energy dis-sipation devices, Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 25, Issue 3, (2008), 49-57.

[14] ATC, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City CA (1996).

[15] FEMA-356, Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Report FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, (2000).

[16] P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design, Earth-quake Spectra, Vol. 16, EERI, (2000), pp. 573-592.

[17] R. Bento, S. Falcão, F. Rodrigues, Avaliação sísmica de estruturas de edifícios com base em análises estáticas não lineares, SISMICA 2004 – 6º Congresso Nacional de Sismologia e Engenharia Sísmica, Guimarães, Portugal, 2004.

[18] MIDASIT, “MIDAS/Civil – General purpose analysis and optimal design system for civil structures”, MIDAS Information Technology Co, Ltd., Korea, 2005.

[19] M.S. Williams, F. Albermani, Evaluation of displacement-based analysis and design methods for steel frames with passive energy dissipators, Civil Engineering Research Bulletin No. 24, University of Queensland, Australia, 2003.

[20] Braz-Cesar, M., Oliveira, D.V. and R. Carneiro-Barros, “Numerical Validation of the Experimental Cyclic Response of RC Frames”, Chapter 12 in the book Trends in Com-putational Structures Technology, Edited by: B.H.V. Topping, Saxe-Coburg Publications, ISBN 978-1-874672-39-5, pp. 267-291, Stirlingshire, Scotland, 2008.

[21] H. Krawinkler, G.D.P.K. Seneviratna, Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, (1998), pp. 452-464.

[22] Park, R. and T. Paulay, Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1975.

[23] Park, R., Priestley, M.J.N., and W.D. Gill; “Ductility of square-confined concrete col-umns”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. ST 4, pp. 929-950, 1982.

[24] Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F. and G.M.S. Calvi, Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1996.

[25] Polyakov, S. V., Masonry in framed building: an investigation into the strength and stiffness of masonry infilling, Moscow, 1957.

[26] Stafford Smith, B. and C. Carter, “A method of analysis for infilled frames”, Proceed-ings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 44, 1969.

[27] Riddington, J. R. and B. Stafford Smith, “Analysis of infilled frames subject to racking with design recommendations”, The Structural Engineer, Vol. 55, Nº 6, 1977.

[28] Paulay, T. and M. Priestley, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

[29] Crisafulli F.J., Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Masonry Infills, PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1997.

[30] Fardis, M.N. and T.B. Panagiotakos, “Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings – Part II: Infilled structures”, Journal of Earth-quake Engineering, Vol. I, No 3, 475-503, 1997.

[31] Eurocódigo 2: Projecto de estruturas de betão; Parte 1-1: Regras gerais e regras para edifícios. Comité Europeu de Normalização, Brussels, 2004.

[32] Fagus, Fagus-5: Version 1.22.0 Build 275, Cubus AG, Zurïch, 2000-2006.

[33] Computers & Structures Inc.; “SAP 2000 v10.0.1 – Structural Analysis Program”. Berkeley, California, U.S.A., 2005.

[34] SeismoSoft SeismoStruck, “A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures”. Available online at: http://www.seismosoft.com; 2006.

[35] Blandon, C.A., “Implementation of an Infill Masonry Model for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings”, Individual Study, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduc-tion of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy, 2005.