پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 660 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,647 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,703,807 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,196,436 |
Comparison of Seismic Input Energy Based on the Characteristics of Structural Hysteretic Behavior | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 7، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 13، اردیبهشت 2019، صفحه 101-109 اصل مقاله (1.08 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2017.1859.1163 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Somayyeh Karimiyan* 1؛ Mahmood Hosseini2 | ||
| 1Department of Civil Engineering, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran | ||
| 2Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 20 دی 1395، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 آبان 1396، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 آبان 1396 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Alteration in earthquake input energy correspond with changes in characteristics of the various existing structures, particularly in hysteretic states, has not been examined to such extent that creates enough confidence to present diverse regulations or standards in field of earthquake energy in codes or guidelines. In this paper, at first, based on a somewhat new insight into the concept of earthquake input energy, two concepts of ‘Received Energy’ (ERec) and ‘Returned Energy’ (ERet) have been discussed. Consequently, by applying various hysteretic models for expressing the behavior of structures, including elasto-plastic, bilinear, Wen, Clough, and Takeda models, and two strength levels for the structure, variations of the ‘Total Input Energy’ (ETot) and also (ERec) and (ERet) with respect to the structural specifications have been inspected, by a series of Non-Linear Time History Analyses (NLTHA). Results reveal that when the structural hysteresis specifications, especially its resistance change the values of seismic input energy vary, remarkably. On this basis, structural hysteresis specifications are introduced as measures for limiting the values of damage in various structural systems. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Wen؛ Takeda and Clough models؛ Non-Linear Time History Analyses | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Kato, B., Akiyama, H. (1975). “Energy input and damage in structures subjected to severe earthquakes.” J. of Structural and Construction Eng, Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), 235: 9-18. [2] Surahman, A., Merati, W. (1992). “Input energy based seismic design code.” Proc. of the 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Eng,Madrid, pp5887-5890. [3] Kinugasa, H. and Nomura, S. (1996). “Fundamental study on the development of seismic design based on energy concept. Part 1: Performance check of earthquake-proof by considering energy input velocity.” J. of Structural and Construction Eng, (Trans. of AIJ), 486: 85-94. [4] Chai, Y. H. and Fajfar, P. (2000). “A procedure for estimating input energy spectra for seismic design.” J. of Earthquake Eng, 4 (4), 539-561. [5] Jiang, Hui., Zhu, Xi. (2006). “Energy input design spectra for near-fault regions and application in energy-based seismic design.” Earthq. Eng. & Eng. Vib, (Sep.-Oct.), 26 (5), 102-108. [6] Hosseini, M., Mirzaee, Rahman., Kourehli, Seyyed Sina,. (2009). “A Study on Using Earthquake Input Energy as a Target Function for Optimizing the Seismic Design of Building Systems.” Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO’09), American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, U.A.E. [7] Poursamad Bonab, Alireza., Hosseini, M. (2010). “A Study on the Dependency of Seismic Input Energy on the Characteristics of Structural Hysteretic Behavior by Using an Explicit Hysteretic Mathematical Model.” Proceedings of the 9th American and the 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 25-29. [8] Haddad Shargh, F., Hosseini, M. (2010). “A study on the existence of an optimal distribution of stiffness over the height of mid- to high-rise buildings to minimize the seismic input energy.” Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol., 10, No. 1, pp45-51. [9] Kuwamura Hitoshi, Galambos Theodore. (1989). “Earthquake Load for Structural Reliability.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Volume 115 Issue 6. [10] Mezgebo, Mebrahtom Gebrekirstos., Lui, Eric M. (2016). “Hysteresis and Soil Site Dependent Input and Hysteretic Energy Spectra for Far-Source Ground Motions.” Advances in Civil Engineering, Volume 2016, Article ID 1548319, 29 pages. [11] Kim, Hyung-Joon. (2012). “Seismic response of flag-shaped hysteretic SDOF systems with seismic fuses.” International Journal of Steel Structures, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 523–535. [12] Abdollahzadeh, Gholamreza., Faghihmaleki, Hadi., Esmaili, Hedieh. (2016). “Comparing Hysteretic Energy and inter-story drift in steel frames with V-shaped brace under near and far fault earthquakes.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, In Press, Corrected Proof. [13] Kazantzi, A.K., Vamvatsikos, D. (2012). “A study on the correlation between dissipated hysteretic energy and seismic performance.” WCEE2012. [14] Ghodrati Amiri, G., Abdollahzadeh Darzi, G., Khanzadi, M. (2007). “Earthquake Duration and Damping Effects on Input Energy”. International Journal of Civil Engineerng, Vol. 5, No. 1. [15] Gebrekirstos Mezgebo, Mebrahtom. (2015). “Estimation of Earthquake Input Energy, Hysteretic Energy and its Distribution in MDOF Structures”. Dissertations - ALL. Paper 228. [16] Bayat, Mahmoud., Abdollahzadeb, G.R. (2011). “Analysis of the steel braced frames equipped with ADAS devices under the far field records”. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 8, pp 163–181. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 906 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 544 |
||