پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 610 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,027 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,772 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,171 |
Seismic Evaluation of Flexible-Base Low-Rise Steel Frames Using Beam-On-Nonlinear-Winkler-Foundation Modeling of Shallow Footings | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 7، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 16، بهمن 2019، صفحه 57-71 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2018.14360.1259 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Behnoud Ganjavi* 1؛ Alireza Rezagholilou2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Australia | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 07 فروردین 1397، تاریخ بازنگری: 28 تیر 1397، تاریخ پذیرش: 25 مهر 1397 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Recent studies have revealed that the influences of Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) can be detrimental to the seismic behavior of structure, and hence ignoring this phenomenon in analysis and design may result in to an un-conservative design. The aim of this paper is to quantify the effects of nonlinear SSI on the seismic response of a low-rise special moment frame subjected to a family of ground motions with three hazard levels. To this end, seismic behavior of a 5-story special steel frame founded on linear and nonlinear flexible-base foundations are compared to the conventional fixed-base frame counterpart. The well-known Beam-on-Nonlinear-Winkler-Foundation (BNWF) approach is employed to model nonlinear soil-shallow foundation. Nonlinear static and time history dynamic analyses were conducted applying the OPENSEES platform in order to inquire the effect of modeling and ground motion parameters on their seismic performance. The results manifested some degrees of inaccuracy in the fixed-base and linear SSI assumptions when compared to its nonlinear flexible-base counterpart. Moreover, it is also found that disregarding the foundation flexibility effect may lead to over prediction of the inter-story drift, force and ductility demands of the low-rise steel structure. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction؛ Seismic Evaluation؛ Low-Rise Building؛ Winkler Model؛ Shallow Foundations | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Veletsos, A. S., and Meek, J. W. (1974). “Dynamic behavior of building foundation systems.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(2), 121-138. [2] Bielak J. (1978). “Dynamic response of non‐linear building‐foundation systems”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 6: 17-30. [3] Wolf JP. (1985). Dynamic soil-structure interaction: Prentice Hall int. [4] Stewart JP, Fenves GL, Seed RB. (1999). “Seismic soil–structure interaction in buildings. I: analytical methods”. ASCE J Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering 125:26–37. [5] ATC-40. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood City (CA): Applied Technology Council (ATC). [6] NEHRP. (2003). Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Building seismic safety council. Washington (DC). [7] FEMA. (2003). Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. [8] ASCE-7-10. (2010). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Reston, VA. [9] Veletsos, A. S., and Nair, V. V. (1975). “Seismic interaction of structures on hysteretic foundations”. Journal of Structural Engineering, 101(1): 109–129. [10] Chopra, A., and Yim, S. C. (1985). “Simplified earthquake analysis of structures with foundation uplift.” Journal of Structural Engineering., 111:(4), 906–930. [11] Kim, Y. S., and Roesset, J. M. (2004). “Effect of nonlinear soil behavior on inelastic seismic response of a structure.” International Journal of Geo-mechanics., 4:(2), 104-114. [12] Wolf JP. (1994). Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models: Pearson Education. [13] Ganjavi B, Hao H. (2012). “A parametric study on the evaluation of ductility demand distribution in multi-degree-of-freedom systems considering soil–structure interaction effects”, Engineering Structures, 43: 88-104. [14] Ganjavi B, Hajirasouliha I, Bolourchi A. (2016). “Optimum lateral load distribution for seismic design of nonlinear shear-buildings considering soil-structure interaction”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 88 356-68. [15] Mahsuli M, Ghannad MA. “The effect of foundation embedment on inelastic response of structures”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2009;38:423-37. [16] Ogut Oc, Mori M, Fukuwa N. “Effect of rocking foundation input motion on the in inelastic behavior of structures”. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering. 2016;81:447-57. [18] Ganjavi B, Hao H, Hajirasouliha I. (2016). Influence of Higher Modes on Strength and Ductility Demands of Soil–Structure Systems, Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 1650006. [17] Ganjavi B, Azad A, Bararnia M. (2018). “Soil Structure Interaction Effects on Hysteretic Energy Demand for Stiffness Degrading Systems Built on Flexible Soil Sites” , Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 6(2) 81-97. [19] N. Hassani, M. Bararnia, G.G. Amiri. (2018). “Effect of soil-structure interaction on inelastic displacement ratios of degrading structures”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 104:75-87. [20] Bararnia M, Hassani N, Ganjavi B, Amiri G.G. (2018). “Estimation of inelastic displacement ratios for soil-structure systems with embedded foundation considering kinematic and inertial interaction effects”. Engineering Structures, 159:252-264. [21] Maheshwari, B. K., and Sarkar, R. (2011). “Seismic behavior of soil-pile structure interaction in liquefiable soils: Parametric study.” International Journal of Geo-mechanics., 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000087, 335–347. [22] Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2013). “Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231, 409–420. [23] Hokmabadi, A. S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2015). “Physical modeling of seismic soil-pile-structure interaction for buildings on soft soils.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000396, 04014046-1. [24] Allotey, N., and Naggar, M. H. E. (2007). “An investigation into the Winkler modeling of the cyclic response of rigid footings.” Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering., 28, 44–57. [25] Horvath, J. S., and Colasanti, R. J. (2011). “Practical subgrade model for improved soil-structure interaction analysis: Model development.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000070, 59–64. [26] Raychowdhury, P., and Hutchinson, T. C. (2009). “Performance evaluation of a nonlinear-Winkler-based shallow foundation model using centrifuge test results.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics., 38(5), 679–698. [27] Raychowdhury, P., and Hutchinson, T. C. (2011). “Performance of seismically loaded shear walls on nonlinear shallow foundations.” International Journal of Numerical Analytical Methods Geomechanics., 35(7), 846–858. [28] Raychowdhury, P., and Singh, P. (2012). “Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildings.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(4), 541-551. [29] Marzban, S., Banazadeh, M. and Azarbakht, A. (2014) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear wall frames considering soil-foundation-structure interaction", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23; 302-318. [30] Vivek, B., Raychowdhury, P. (2017). “Influence of SSI on Period and Damping of Buildings Supported by Shallow Footings on Cohesionless Soil”. International Journal of Geomechanics https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000890 [31] Harden CW, Hutchinson T, Martin GR, Kutter BL. (2005). “Numerical modeling of the nonlinear cyclic response of shallow foundations”. Technical Report 2005/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER. [32] R.W. Boulanger. (2000). The PySimple1, TzSimple1, and QzSimple1 Material Models, Documentation for the OpenSees platform; URL: h http://opensees. Berkeley. [33] Gazetas G. (1991). Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.117(9): 1363-81. [34] Terzaghi K. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. New York: Wiley; 1943. [35] Meyerhof GG. (1963). “Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1(1):16–26. [36] Gajan, S., Raychowdhury, P., Hutchinson, T.C., Kutter, B.L. and Stewart, J.P. (2010). Application and validation of practical tools for nonlinear soil-foundation interaction analysis", Earthquake Spectra, 26(1): 111-129. [37]. Standard No. 2800. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, 4th Edition, 2013. [38] Raychowdhury, P. (2011). “Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil-structure interaction (SSI)", Engineering Structures, 33: 958-967. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 899 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 487 |
||