A Comparative Analysis of Discourse-Oriented Contexts of Prophet Noah In two Surahs of Hood and Noah Based on Van Leeuwen's Framework | ||
| مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی | ||
| Article 11, Volume 11, Issue 22, November 2020, Pages 297-322 PDF (571.8 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22075/jlrs.2019.16437.1362 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ebrahim Fallah* 1; Sajjad Shafipoor2 | ||
| 1Assistant professor of Islamic Azad university of Sari branch | ||
| 2phd student | ||
| Receive Date: 06 November 2018, Revise Date: 04 August 2019, Accept Date: 22 October 2019 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In this study, the discourse-oriented contexts of the narrative of Prophet Noah in Van Leeuwen's sociological-semantic framework have been examined in terms of the effectiveness of this model and its components in analyzing this narrative. Also, the way social agents are represented by the narrative of Noah and his people has been analyzed with respect to sociological-semantic components in order to produce and convey specific ideologies in the lower layers of the text in the condition of revelation era in the two surahs of Hood and Noah. This study with descriptive-analytical approach seeks to comparatively analyze the components of the discourse-oriented discourse of Noah (AS) in the two surahs of Hood and Noah based on the critical theory of Van Leeuween's discourse analysis and clarify the relation how to represent these components in diachronic approach with relavation era and the social status of Muslims. The results show that the representation of narrative social agents in Hood indicates that naming components with 22 used, deleting with 17 and indeterminate with 11 items have higher frequency than other components. This is in keeping with the conditions of the Muslims in the revelation era of the narrative that suggests the process of discourse is hidden. But in narrating the narrative in Noah surah, the low frequency components such as indeterminacy with 6 and deletion with 2 indicate the existence of openness in the discourse. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| narrative of Noah; HoodSurah; NoahSurah; discourse; VanLeeuwen | ||
| References | ||
|
-The Holy Quran -Arghavani Beidakhti, Hamideh et al. (2019), Application of the theory of syntactic order with the middle part of verse 4 of Surah Maryam, Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, No. 19, pp. 7-24. -Asadi, Massoud (2012), A Study of the Relationship between Discourse-Oriented Structures and Ideology and Power Relations in Press Texts from the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis, PhD Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. -Pahlavannejad, Mohammad Reza et al. (2009), Methods of Representation of Social Agents in Constitutional Periodicals from the Perspective of Critical Discourse with Considering the Discourse-Oriented Components of Socio-Semantic, Linguistics and Dialects of Khorasan, No. 1, pp. 51-73. -Ragheb Isfahani, Hussein Ibn Muhammad (1412 AH), Al-Mufradat Fi Gharib Al-Quran, Ch 1, Beirut: Dar Al-Alam. -Sahebi, Siamak et al. (2010), A Study and Critique of Golestan Narrative Based on the Theory of Critical Analysis of Discourse, Persian Language and Literature Research, No. 16, pp. 109-133. -Tabatabai, Mohammad Hussein (1417 AH), Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Quran, Ch 5, Qom: Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Teachers of the Seminary. -Tabarsi, Fazl Ibn Hassan (1998), Interpretation of Comprehensive Societies, Tehran: University of Tehran. -Tarihi, Fakhreddin (1375), Bahrain Complex, III, Tehran: Mortazavi Bookstore. -Arab Yousefabadi, Abolfazl et al. (2017), A Study of the Discourse-Oriented Structures of Surah Al-Qasas Based on Van Leeuwon's Model, Quranic Literary Research, Fifth Year, No. 3, pp. 41-62. -Amid, Hassan (2010), Amid Persian Culture, First, Tehran: The Road to Growth. - Fairclough, Norman (2000), Critical Analysis of Discourse, translated by Fatemeh Shayesteh Piran and others, Tehran, Center for Media Studies and Research. -Ghorashi, Sayyid Ali Akbar (1377), Tafsir Ahsan Al-Hadith, III, Tehran: Ba'ath Foundation. 14. Kalbi, Hashem Ibn Mohammad (1364), Al-Asnam, II, Tehran: New Publishing. - Lotte, Yakoub (2009), An Introduction to Narrative in Literature and Cinema, translated by Omid Nikfarjam, II, Tehran: Minavi Kherad. - Qudari, Sadiqah Sadat; Jahangiri, Shokoofeh (2015), Critical Discourse Analysis of Sacred Defense Poetry for Children from the Perspective of Van Livon's Approach, Literary Text Research, Volume 19. Number 121. pp. 160-65. - Moqaddasi Motahar Ibn Tahir (1374), Creation and History, translated by Mohammad Reza Shafi'i Kadkani, Tehran: Ad. - Makarem Shirazi, Nasser et al. (1374), Tafsir Nomoneh, Tehran: Islamic Books House. - Hashemi, Ahmad (2001), Jawahar al-Balaghah, translated by Mahmoud Khorsandi and Hamid Masjed Sarai, Ch 2, Bija, Feyz Publishing - Van Dyke, Theon (2004), Studies in Discourse Analysis from Grammar to Critical Discourse, translated by Pirooz Izadi et al., Tehran: Center for Media Research Studies. - Yarmohammadi, Lotfollah (2006), Communication from the Perspective of Critical Discourse, Tehran: Hermes. - Jorgensen, Marian and Phillips Louise (2010), Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney Publishing. - Yousefzadeh, Gholamreza (2013), Levels of Narration in Quran Stories, Qom: Islamic Research Center. -Van Leeuwen, Theo (2008), Discourse and Practice, New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis, Oxford University Press. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 576 PDF Download: 433 |
||