پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 671 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,781 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,568,694 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,708,993 |
نقش انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان در پیش بینی ترس از کرونا (کووید-19) در ساکنان شهر کرمانشاه | ||
| روانشناسی بالینی: نوآوری‌ها در پژوهش و عمل | ||
| مقاله 18، دوره 13، شماره2 - شماره پیاپی 50، تیر 1400، صفحه 191-200 اصل مقاله (532 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jcp.2021.22272.2048 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محسن محمدپور1؛ راضیه رحیمی چم حیدری* 2؛ نازلی رمضانی2؛ رویا احمدی3؛ محمدرضا بیرانوندی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور آذربایجان، آذربایجان، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 12 دی 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 03 اسفند 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 فروردین 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه : شیوع جهانی کرونا و اجرای محدودیت باعث ترس و اضطرابی زیادی در افراد جامعه شده است و این به نوبه خود باعث ایجاد مشکلات روان شناختی می شود. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین نقش انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان در پیش بینی ترس از کرونا در بین ساکنان شهر کرمانشاه بود. روش : روش این مطالعه، از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی بود. جامعه پژوهش ساکنان شهر کرمانشاه در سال 1399 بودند که از میان آنان 317 نفر به صورت آنلاین از طریق شبکه های مجازی شرکت کردند. جهت جمع آوری داده ها از مقیاس اضطراب کرونا (CAS)، نسخه دوم پذیرش و عمل (AAQ-II) و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان (DERS) استفاده شد. یافته ها : نتایج نشان داد که ترس از کرونا با انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی رابطه منفی (0/401-=r) و با دشواری در تنظیم هیجان رابطه مثبت (0/397=r) دارد. همچنین نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی (اجتناب تجربه‌ای) و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان توانستند 18/6درصد از تغییرات ترس از کرونا را تبیین نمایند. نتیجه گیری : با توجه به ترس از کرونا در بین افراد، می توان برنامه ها و مدخلاتی را به صورت آنلاین یا آفلاین از طریق کارگاه های آموزشی برای افزایش انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی، پذیرش افراد و بهبود راهبردهای تنظیم هیجان اجرا کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انعطاف پذیری روان شناختی؛ ترس از کرونا؛ دشواری درتنظیم هیجان؛ کرونا ویروس | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Role of Psychological Flexibility and Difficulty in Emotion Regulation in Predicting Corona Fear (Covid-19) in Kermanshah Residents | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohsen Mohammadpour1؛ Razie Rahimi cham heydari2؛ Nazli Ramezani2؛ Roya Ahmadi3؛ Mohammadreza Beiranvandi3 | ||
| 1PhD Student, Clinical Psychology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Master student, Clinical Psychology, Payam-e-Noor University of Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan, Iran | ||
| 3Master student, Clinical Psychology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: The global prevalence of coronation and the implementation of restrictions have caused a great deal of fear and anxiety in people in society, which in turn has caused psychological problems. The aim of this study was to determine the role of psychological flexibility and difficulty in emotion regulating in predicting corona fear among residents of Kermanshah. Method: The method of this study was descriptive-correlational. The research population was residents of Kermanshah in 1399, of which 317 people participated online through virtual networks. Corona Anxiety Scale (CAS), Acceptance, and Practice Version (AAQ-II) , and Difficulty Emotion Regulation (DERS) were used to collect data. Results: The results showed that fear of corona was negatively related to psychological resilience (r = -0/401) and positively related to difficulty in emotion regulation (r = 0/397). The results of regression analysis also showed that psychological flexibility (experiential avoidance) and difficulty in emotion regulation were able to explain %18/6 of the changes in coronary fear. Conclusion: Due to the fear of coronation among individuals, programs and interventions can be implemented online or offline through workshops to increase psychological flexibility, acceptance of individuals, and improve emotion regulation strategies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Psychological resilience, Corona fear, Difficulty in emotion regulating, Coronavirus | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع 1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. 2. Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, Latzman RD. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of mental health and addiction. 2020. 3. Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Zhang Y, Lu JG, Rand DG. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological science. 2020;31(7):770-80. 4. Geddie J, Sipalan J. To Mask or Not to Mask: Confusion Spreads over Coronavirus Protection. Health News Disponible en: https://uk reuters com/article/us-china-health-masks-safety/to-mask-or-not-to-maskconfusion-spreads-over-coronavirus-protection-idUKKBN1ZU0PH. 2020. 5. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu Y-J, Mao Y-P, Ye R-X, Wang Q-Z, et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infectious diseases of poverty. 2020;9(1):1-12. 6. Yang Y, Li W, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Cheung T, Xiang Y-T. Mental health services for older adults in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):e19. 7. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. The Lancet. 2020;395(10224):e37-e8. 8. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(5):1729. 9. Mohammadpour M, Ghorbani V, Khoramnia S, Ahmadi SM, Ghvami M, Maleki M. Anxiety, Self-Compassion, Gender Differences and COVID-19: Predicting Self-Care Behaviors and Fear of COVID-19 Based on Anxiety and Self-Compassion with an Emphasis on Gender Differences. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;15(3):213. 10. Aziziaram S, Basharpoor S. The Role of Rumination, Emotion Regulation and Responsiveness to Stress in Predicting of Corona Anxiety (COVID-19) among Nurses. Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management. 2020;9(3):8-18. 11. Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Fox J-P, Schreurs KM, Spinhoven P. The role of psychological flexibility in a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour research and therapy. 2013;51(3):142-51. 12. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change: Guilford Press; 2011. 13. Bryan CJ, Ray-Sannerud B, Heron EA. Psychological flexibility as a dimension of resilience for posttraumatic stress, depression, and risk for suicidal ideation among Air Force personnel. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2015;4(4):263-8. 14. Safari Mousavi SS, Nadri M, Amiri M, Radfar F, Farokhcheh M. The predictive role of psychological flexibility and cognitive emotion regulation strategies on depression, anxiety and stress in type 2 diabetic patients. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:50-. 15. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2003;85(2):348. 16. Steward T, Pico-Perez M, Mata F, Martinez-Zalacain I, Cano M, Contreras-Rodriguez O, et al. Emotion regulation and excess weight: impaired affective processing characterized by dysfunctional insula activation and connectivity. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152150. 17. Kord B, Karimi S. The prediction of emotional regulation based on the students' Self-Compassion and body image. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2017;14(28):207-30. 18. EJEI J, GHOLAMALI LM, ERAMI H. Comparison Of Emotional Regulation In Substance Abusers And Normal Subjects. 2015. 19. Dupont WD, Plummer Jr WD. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Controlled clinical trials. 1998;19(6):589-601. 20. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment. 2004;26(1):41-54. 21. Khanzadeh M, Saeediyan M, Hosseinchari M, Edrissi F. Factor structure and psychometric properties of difficulties in emotional regulation scale. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2012;6(1):87-96. 22. Bond F, Hayes S, Baer R, Carpenter K, Guenole N, Orcutt H, et al. AAQ-II. Behavior therapy. 2011;42(4):676-88. 23. Abasi E, Fti L, Molodi R, Zarabi H. Psychometric properties of Persian version of acceptance and action questionnaire-II. 2013. 24. Ahorsu DK, Lin C-Y, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction. 2020. 25. Pouyan Fard S, Taheri AA, Ghvami M, Ahmadi SM, Mohammadpour M. Individual, gender differences and corona: The relationship between personality traits and gender differences with corona self care behaviour. Shenakht journal of psychology & psychiatry. 2020;7(4):67-77. 26. Ezazi Bojnourdi E, Ghadampour S, Moradi Shakib A, Ghazbanzadeh R. Predicting Corona Anxiety based on Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies, Health Hardiness and Death Anxiety in Diabetic Patients. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2020;8(2):34-44. 27. Mohammadpour M, Ghorbani V, Moradi M, khaki Z, Foroghi AA, Rezaei M. Psychometric Properties of the iranin Version of the Coronavirus Anexiety Scale (CAS). IJPCP. 2020;26(9-9). 28. Khodayarifard M, Asayesh MH. Psychological Coping Strategies and Techniques to deal with Stress & Anxiety around Coronavirus (COVID-19). Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2020;9(8):1-18. 29. Taghizadeh M, Farmani A. A study of the role of cognitive flexibility in predicting hopelessness and resilience among University students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2014;1(2):67-75. 30. Hirsch CR, Mathews A, Clark DM, Williams R, Morrison JA. The causal role of negative imagery in social anxiety: A test in confident public speakers. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2006;37(2):159-70. 31. Rafiipour A, Shafaqati S, Abedini A, Jafari T. Predicting test anxiety based on the dimensions of difficulty in regulating emotion in students. Journal of Research in Educational Systems. 2019;13(46):111-22. 32. Mahmoud Alilou M, Khanjani Z, Bayat A. Prediction of anxiety-related emotional disorders in adolescences based on emotion regulation, coping strategies and symptoms borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2017;7(25):107-28. 33. Yoo SH, Matsumoto D, LeRoux JA. The influence of emotion recognition and emotion regulation on intercultural adjustment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2006;30(3):345-63. 34. Aldao A, Nolen-Houseman S. S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review.30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,878 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,269 |
||