پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 671 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,515,798 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,635,060 |
پیش‌بینی رفتارهای انطباقی در برابر کووید 19 بر اساس نقش عواطف، خودشفقتی و آسیب‌پذیری روانی | ||
| روانشناسی بالینی: نوآوری‌ها در پژوهش و عمل | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 13، شماره2 - شماره پیاپی 50، تیر 1400، صفحه 65-74 اصل مقاله (601.14 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jcp.2021.22635.2084 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عارفه حمیده مقدم* 1؛ زینب شریفی پور چوکامی1؛ عباس ابوالقاسمی2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، روانشناسی عمومی، دانشگاه گیلان، گیلان، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه گیلان، گیلان، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 23 بهمن 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 اسفند 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 12 اردیبهشت 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: با توجه به نقش عوامل روان‌شناختی در رفتارهای انطباقی، هدف پژوهش حاضر پیش‌بینی رفتارهای انطباقی بزرگسالان در برابر کووید 19 بر اساس نقش عواطف مثبت و منفی، خودشفقتی و آسیب‌پذیری روانی است. روش: این پژوهش توصیفی، با طرح همبستگی انجام شد. شرکت کنندگان در تحقیق 284 بزرگسال ساکن شهر رشت بودند که به صورت در دسترس انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه رفتارهای انطباقی در برابر کووید 19 کلارک و همکاران، پرسشنامه عواطف مثبت و منفی واتسون و همکاران، فرم کوتاه شفقت به خود نف و فرم کوتاه پرسشنامه نشانه‌های دورا و همکاران را به صورت آنلاین تکمیل نمودند. یافته ها: نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نشان داد که عواطف مثبت و منفی، شفقت به خود و آسیب‌پذیری روانی 31/1 درصد واریانس رفتارهای انطباقی بزرگسالان در برابر ویروس کووید 19 را پیش‌بینی می‌کنند. نتیجه گیری: یافته‌های این پژوهش حاکی از نقش مهم عواطف، خودشفقتی و آسیب‌پذیری روانی در پیش‌بینی به کار بستن رفتارهای انطباقی در برابر کووید 19 در بزرگسالان است. پیشنهاد می‌شود که برنامه‌های آموزشی با هدف افزایش خودشفقتی و عواطف مثبت و کاهش آسیب‌پذیری و عواطف منفی بزرگسالان برای مقاوم سازی افراد در شرایط کنونی طراحی و اجرا شوند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آسیب پذیری روانی؛ خودشفقتی؛ رفتار انطباقی؛ عواطف؛ کووید 19 | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Predicting compliance behaviors against Covid 19 based on affects, self-compassion and psychological vulnerability | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Arefeh Hamideh Moghadam1؛ zeinab sharifipour Chokami1؛ abbas abolghasemi2 | ||
| 1M.Sc., General Psychology, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: According to the role of Psychological factors in adaptive behaviors, the purpose of this research is prediction of adults adaptive behaviors according to the role of positive and negative affects, self compassion and psychological vulnerability. Methods: This research performed descriptive and by correlation design. The participants was 284 adults who lived in Rasht city and they have chosen available and they completed the Clark et al adaptive behaviors against COVID-19 questionnaire, Watson et al Positive and negative affect scales (PANAS), Neff et al Self-Compassion Scale (short-form) and Dura et al Brief Symptoms Inventory 18. Results: The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that self compassion, positive affect, negative affect and psychological vulnerability specify 31/1 percent of adaptive behaviors against COVID-19 variance among adults. Conclusion: Findings of this study indicate the important role of affects, self-compassion and psychological vulnerability in predicting the use of adaptive behaviors against COVID-19 in adults. It is recommended that training programs be designed and implemented with the aim of increasing self-compassion and positive affects and reducing the psychological vulnerability and negative affects of adults to make people resilient in the current situation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| psychological vulnerability, self compassion, compliance behaviors, affects, Covid 19 | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع 1. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. The lancet. Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):228–229.
2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10223):507–513.
3. Wu Z, McGoogan J M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239–1242.
4. Weiss SR, Leibowitz J L. Coronavirus pathogenesis. Advances in virus research. 2011; (81):85–164.
5. Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10228):931–934.
6. Haleem A, Javaid M, Vaishya R. Effects of COVID 19 pandemic in daily life. Current medicine research and practice. 2020;10(2):78–79.
7. Zhang SX, Wang Y, Rauch A,Wei F. Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry research. 2020; (288):112958.
8. Leppin A, Aro AR. Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research. International journal of behavioral medicine. 2009;16(1):7–29.
9. Petrie KJ, Weinman J. Illness beliefs about hypertension among non-patients and healthy relatives of patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1997;42(2):113-116.
10. Clark C, Davila A, Regis M, Kraus S.X. Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation. Global Transitions.2020; (2):76–82.
11. Pérez-Fuentes M, Molero Jurado M, Martos Martínez Á, Gázquez Linares J J. Threat of COVID-19 and emotional state during quarantine: Positive and negative affect as mediators in a cross-sectional study of the Spanish population. PloS one; 2020:15(6):e0235305.
12. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. (New York, N.Y.).1987;236(4799):280–285.
13. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020; 395(10227):912–20.
14. Macatee RJ, Albanese BJ, Schmidt NB, Cougle JR. Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study. Behaviour research and therapy. 2017; (90):96–110.
15. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology. 1988; (54):1063–1070.
16. Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin. (1984); (96):465–490.
17. Strecher VJ, DeVellis BM, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health education quarterly. 1986;13(1):73–92.
18. Aspinwall LG. Rethinking the role of positive affect in self-regulation. Motiv Emot. 1998;22(1):1–32.
19. Cohen S, Pressman SD. Positive affect and health. Current Directions inPsychological Science. 2006; (15):122–125.
20. Sin NL, Moskowitz JT, Whooley MA. Positive Affect and Health Behaviors Across 5 Years in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: The Heart and Soul Study. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(9):1058-1066.
21. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Positive affect and biological function in everyday life. Neurobiology of Aging. 2005;26(l1):108–S112.
22. Neff K. Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and identity. 2003;2(2):85-101.
23. Foroughi A, Khanjani S, Rafiee S, Taheri A. Self-compassion: conceptualization, research, and interventions (Brief review). Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2020;6(6):77-87 (Persian).
24. Coyne LW, Gould ER, Grimaldi M, Wilson KG, Baffuto G, Biglan A. First Things First: Parent Psychological Flexibility and Self-Compassion During COVID-19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 6]. Behav Anal Pract. 2020;1-7.
25. Sharifi Saki, Sh, Alipor A, Aghayuosefi A, Mohamadi M, Ghobari Bonab B. The Relationship between Self-Compassion with Depression in Women with Breast Cancer with Mediation Death Anxiety. Health Psychology. 2019;8(29):52-67 (Persian).
26. Morgan TL, Semenchuk BN, Ceccarelli L, et al. Self-Compassion, Adaptive Reactions and Health Behaviours Among Adults With Prediabetes and Type 1, Type 2 and Gestational Diabetes: A Scoping Review. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44(6):555-565.
27. Kavakli, M; AK, M; Uguz, F & Tukmen, OO. The mediating role of self-compassion in the relationship between perceived COVID-19 threat and death anxiety. Turkish J Clinical Psychiatry. 2020; (23):15-23.
28. Hatami Varzaneh A, Fathi E, Khanipour H, Habibi N. Predicting Helping Attitude based on Attachment styles, Empathy, and Self-compassion among Volunteer and non-Volunteer Groups in Public Participation during COVID-19 Outbreak. Research in Psychological Health. 2020;14(1):87-101 (Persian).
29. Mohammadpour M, Ghorbani V, Khoramnia S, Ahmadi SM, Ghvami M, Maleki M. Anxiety, Self-Compassion, Gender Differences and COVID-19: Predicting Self-Care Behaviors and Fear of COVID-19 Based on Anxiety and Self-Compassion with an Emphasis on Gender Differences. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020;15(3):213-219.
30. Satici, AS. Psychological vulnerability, resilience, and subjective well-being: The mediating role of hope. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; (102):68-73.
31. Besharat MA, Masoudi M, Gholmali Lavasani M. Predicting psychological and physical vulnerabilities based on social isolation: The moderating role of gender and marital status. Journal of Psychological Sciences. 2015;13(52):474-489 (Persian).
32. Wong MC, Teoh JY, Huang J, Wong SH. The potential impact of vulnerability and coping capacity on the pandemic control of COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(5):816-846.
33. Cohen Sh. Psychosocial Vulnerabilities to Upper Respiratory Infectious Illness: Implications for Susceptibility to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2020; 16(1):161–174.
34. Paulsson-Do U, Edlund B, Stenhammar C, Westerling R. Psychosocial vulnerability underlying four common unhealthy behaviours in 15-16-year-old Swedish adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol. 2017;5(1):39.
35. Green SB. How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1991; 26(3): 499-510.
36. Gharadaghi A, Komeylipour F. The Effectiveness of Positive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on the Positive and Negative Affect of women with spouse with Mental Disorders. Quarterly of Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy. 2019;10(38):177-193 (Persian).
37. Raes F, Pommier E, Neff K, Gucht D. Construction and Factorial Validation of a Short Form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2011; (18): 250-255.
38. Khanjani S, Foroughi A, Sadghi Kh, Bahrainian, SA. Psychometric properties of Iranian version of self-compassionscale (short form). Pajoohande. 2016;21(5):282-289 (Persian).
39. Dura AE, Anreua Y, Galdona JM, Murguib S, Povedac R, Jimenez Y. Psychological Assessment Of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders, Confirmatory Analysis Of The Dimensional Structure Of The Brief Symptoms Inventory18B. Journal Of Psychosomatic Research.. 2006; (60):365- 370.
40. Abolghasemi A, Ebrahimi Y, narimani M, Asadi F. The role of defense mechanisms and resiliency in the prediction of psychological vulnerability in asthmatic patients. Health Psychology. 2015;3(4):84-96 (Persian).
41. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
George D, Mallery P. Using SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 4th Edition. London | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,239 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 700 |
||