Seismic Improvement and Rehabilitation of Steel Concentric Braced Frames: A Framework-Based Review

[1]     Construction AI of S. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings 2002.

[2]     W. RC. Connection Performance for Seismic Design of Steel Moment Frames. J Struct Eng 2002;128:517–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(517).

[3]     Michael P, Derek S, Bing Q, Gilberto M. Seismic Rehabilitation of Concentrically Braced Frames Using Stiff Rocking Cores. J Struct Eng 2017;143:4017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001810.

[4]     Sloat D, Roeder CW, Lehman DE, Berman JW. Survey and testing of pre-1988 braced frame structures from the West Coast of the United States. 5th Int. Conf. Adv. Exp. Struct. Eng. Taipei, Taiwan, 2013.

[5]     Sanchez-Zamora F. Seismic Rehabilitation of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Vulnerable to Soft-Story Failure through Implementation of Rocking Cores. Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, 2013.

[6]     Bellini A, Shahreza SK, Mazzotti C. Cyclic bond behavior of FRCM composites applied on masonry substrate. Compos Part B Eng 2019;169:189–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.009.

[7]     Santandrea M, Baietti G, Kahangi Shahreza S, Carloni C. A Comparison Between the Bond Behavior of SRP and SRG Strengthening Systems Applied to a Masonry Substrate, 2019, p. 1743–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_187.

[8]     Jahangir H, Hasani H, Esfahani MR. Damage Localization of RC Beams via Wavelet Analysis of Noise Contaminated Modal Curvatures. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2021;5:101–33. https://doi.org/10.22115/scce.2021.292279.1340.

[9]     A. MG, Yoshihiro K, Charles R. Effect of Column Stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behavior. J Struct Eng 2004;130:381–91. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(381).

[10]   Bing Q, Francisco S-Z, Michael P. Transforming Seismic Performance of Deficient Steel Concentrically Braced Frames through Implementation of Rocking Cores. J Struct Eng 2015;141:4014139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001085.

[11]   Jahangir H, Esfahani MR. Investigating loading rate and fibre densities influence on SRG - concrete bond behaviour. Steel Compos Struct 2020;34:877–89. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.877.

[12]   Tirca L, Serban O, Lin L, Wang M, Lin N. Improving the Seismic Resilience of Existing Braced-Frame Office Buildings. J Struct Eng 2016;142:C4015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001302.

[13]   Bolouri Bazaz J, Zadehmohamad M, Hashemi SS. Developing a Portable Curtain Sand Pluviator for Reconstitution of Soil Models. Modares Civ Eng J 2018;18:231–42.

[14]   Bradley CR, Fahnestock LA, Hines EM. Dual system design for a low-ductility concentrically braced frame with a reserve moment frame. Structures 2021;34:3315–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.09.009.

[15]   Seker O. Seismic response of dual concentrically braced steel frames with various bracing configurations. J Constr Steel Res 2022;188:107057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2021.107057.

[16]   Costanzo S, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R. The influence of moment resisting beam-to-column connections on seismic behavior of chevron concentrically braced frames. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2018;113:136–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2018.06.001.

[17]   Zadehmohamad M, Bolouri Bazaz J. Cyclic behaviour of geocell-reinforced backfill behind integral bridge abutment. Int J Geotech Eng 2019;13:438–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1364882.

[18]   Whittaker AS. An experimental study of the behavior of dual steel systems. University of California at Berkeley, 1990.

[19]   Mohammadi M, Kafi MA, Kheyroddin A, Ronagh HR, Rashidi M. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Innovative Composite Buckling-Restrained Fuse BT - ACMSM25. In: Wang CM, Ho JCM, Kitipornchai S, editors., Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020, p. 113–21.

[20]   Mohammadi M, Kafi MA, Kheyroddin A, Ronagh HR. Experimental Evaluation of an Innovative Buckling-Restrained Fuse for Concentrically Braced Frames under Cyclic Loading. J. Struct. Constr. Eng., vol. 8, Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering. Semnan University, Semnan, Iran: 2021, p. 124–40. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2019.182841.1838.

[21]   Javadi E, Yakhchalian M. Selection of Optimal Intensity Measure for Seismic Assessment of Steel Buckling Restrained Braced Frames under Near-Fault Ground Motions. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2019;7:114–33. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2018.14908.1278.

[22]   Qiu C, Liu J, Teng J, Li Z, Du X. Seismic performance evaluation of multi-story CBFs equipped with SMA-friction damping braces. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2021;32:1725–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X20987000.

[23]   Naghavi M, Rahnavard R, Thomas RJ, Malekinejad M. Numerical evaluation of the hysteretic behavior of concentrically braced frames and buckling restrained brace frame systems. J Build Eng 2019;22:415–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2018.12.023.

[24]   Sadeghi S, Rofooei FR. Improving the seismic performance of diagrid structures using buckling restrained braces. J Constr Steel Res 2020;166:105905. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2019.105905.

[25]   Barbagallo F, Bosco M, Marino EM, Rossi PP. Achieving a more effective concentric braced frame by the double-stage yield BRB. Eng Struct 2019;186:484–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2019.02.028.

[26]   Ji X, Kato M, Wang T, Hitaka T, Nakashima M. Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames. J Constr Steel Res 2009;65:2148–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2009.07.003.

[27]   Kimura Y, MacRae GA. Effect of Column Flexural Stiffness and Strength on Story Drift Concentration for Two Story Braced Frames n.d.

[28]   Yang CS, Leon RT, DesRoches R. Design and behavior of zipper-braced frames. Eng Struct 2008;30:1092–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2007.06.010.

[29]   Yang TY, Stojadinovic B, Moehle J. Hybrid simulation of a zipper-braced steel frame under earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2009;38:95–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.848.

[30]   Tirca L, Tremblay R. Influence of building height and ground motion type on the seismic behavior of zipper concentrically braced steel frames. 13th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., 2004.

[31]   Nouri GR, Kalesar HI, Ameli Z. The applicability of the zipper strut to seismic rehabilitation of steel structures. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2009;58:402–5.

[32]   Chen L. Innovative bracing system for earthquake resistant concentrically braced frame structures. Concordia University, 2011.

[33]   Nasim IS, Abdolrahim J. Seismic Response Investigation of Rocking Zipper-Braced Frames under Near-Fault Ground Motions. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 2021;26:4020063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000549.

[34]   Wijesundara KK, Nascimbene R, Rassati GA. Evaluation of the seismic performance of suspended zipper column concentrically braced steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 2018;150:452–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2018.09.003.

[35]   Ozcelik Y, Saritas A, Clayton PM. Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 2016;119:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2015.12.019.

[36]   G. SB, A. MS. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Strongback Braced Frame System to Mitigate Weak Story Behavior. J Struct Eng 2018;144:4017211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001960.

[37]   Jiun-Wei L, A. MS. Strongback System: A Way to Reduce Damage Concentration in Steel-Braced Frames. J Struct Eng 2015;141:4014223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001198.

[38]   Mar D. Design examples using mode shaping spines for frame and wall buildings. Proc. 9th US Natl. 10th Can. Conf. Earthq. Eng. Toronto, Canada, 2010, p. 25–9.

[39]   Jahangir H, Hasani H, Esfahani MR. Wavelet-based damage localization and severity estimation of experimental RC beams subjected to gradual static bending tests. Structures 2021;34:3055–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.059.

[40]   Fakharian P. Structural Damage Detection Using Wavelet Packet Transform and Improved Peak-Picking Method. Semnan University, 2014.

[41]   Hojatirad A, Naderpour H. Seismic assessment of RC structures having shape memory alloys rebar and strengthened using CFRP sheets in terms of fragility curves. Bull Earthq Eng 2021;19:5087–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01141-w.

[42]   Sadeghi A, Abdollahzadeh G, Rajabnejad H, Naseri SA. Numerical analysis method for evaluating response modification factor for steel structures equipped with friction dampers. Asian J Civ Eng 2021;22:313–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00315-2.

[43]   Roke D, Jeffers B. Parametric study of self-centering concentrically-braced frame systems with friction-based energy dissipation. Proceeding Behav Steel Struct Seism Areas 2012:691–6.

[44]   Piluso V, Montuori R, Nastri E, Paciello A. Seismic response of MRF-CBF dual systems equipped with low damage friction connections. J Constr Steel Res 2019;154:263–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2018.12.008.

[45]   Hashemi SV, Miri M, Rashki M, Etedali S. Reliability and reliability-based sensitivity analysis of self-centering buckling restrained braces using meta-models. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2021:1045389X211026382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211026382.

[46]   Mashhadiali N, Saadati S, Mohajerani SAM, Ebadi P. Hybrid braced frame with buckling-restrained and strong braces to mitigate soft story. J Constr Steel Res 2021;181:106610. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2021.106610.

[47]   Ghamari A, Almasi B, Kim C, Jeong S-H, Hong K-J. An Innovative Steel Damper with a Flexural and Shear–Flexural Mechanism to Enhance the CBF System Behavior: An Experimental and Numerical Study. Appl Sci  2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311454.

[48]   Farsi A, Amiri HR, Dehghan Manshadi SH. An innovative C-shaped yielding metallic dampers for steel structures. Structures 2021;34:4254–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.08.069.

[49]   Farhangi V, Jahangir H, Eidgahee DR, Karimipour A, Javan SAN, Hasani H, et al. Behaviour Investigation of SMA-Equipped Bar Hysteretic Dampers Using Machine Learning Techniques. Appl Sci 2021;11:10057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110057.

[50]   Jahangir H, Bagheri M. Evaluation of Seismic Response of Concrete Structures Reinforced by Shape Memory Alloys (Technical Note). Int J Eng 2020;33. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2020.33.03c.05.

[51]   Haddad A, Rezazadeh Eidgahee D, Naderpour H. A probabilistic study on the geometrical design of gravity retaining walls. World J Eng 2017;14:414–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-07-2016-0034.

[52]   Rezazadeh Eidgahee D, Jahangir H, Solatifar N, Fakharian P, Rezaeemanesh M. Data-driven estimation models of asphalt mixtures dynamic modulus using ANN, GP and combinatorial GMDH approaches. Neural Comput Appl 2022;34:17289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07382-3.

[53]   Onyelowe KC, Rezazadeh Eidgahee D, Jahangir H, Aneke FI, Nwobia LI. Forecasting Shear Parameters, and Sensitivity and Error Analyses of Treated Subgrade Soil. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-022-00225-7.

[54]   Salehi Fereidouni S, Du X. Evaluation the Impact of Flexible Joints and Deck on the Seismic Response of Bridges. Comput Eng Phys Model 2022;5:1–18. https://doi.org/10.22115/cepm.2022.321993.1198.

[55]   Bosco M, Marino EM, Rossi PP. Behavior Factor of Dual Concentrically Braced Systems Designed by Eurocode 8. 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., 2012.

[56]   Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V. Theory of plastic mechanism control for MRF–CBF dual systems and its validation. Bull Earthq Eng 2014;12:2745–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9612-2.

[57]   Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V. Moment frames – concentrically braced frames dual systems: analysis of different design criteria. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2016;12:122–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.996164.

[58]   ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures 2013.

[59]   Wang Y. Seismic Performance of Steel Buildings with Braced Dual Configuration and Traditional Frame Systems through Nonlinear Collapse Simulations 2018.

[60]   American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures 2017.

[61]   Rezaee Manesh M, Fattahi S, Saffari H. Investigation of earthquake significant duration on the seismic performance of adjacent steel structures in near-source. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2021;9:84–101. https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2020.20373.1410.

[62]   Rezaeemanesh M, Ghasemi SH, Rezaeemanesh M. Dual target optimization of two dimensional truss using cost efficiency and structural reliability sufficiency. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2020;4:98–111. https://doi.org/10.22115/SCCE.2020.244833.1252.

[63]   XIE Q. Dual system design of steel frames incorporating buckling-restrained braces. Fourth Int Conf Adv Steel Struct 2005:315–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044637-0/50046-9.

[64]   Montuori R, Nastri E, Piluso V. Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control for MRF–EBF dual systems: Closed form solution. Eng Struct 2016;118:287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2016.03.050.

[65]   Montuori R, Nastri E, Piluso V. Influence of the bracing scheme on seismic performances of MRF-EBF dual systems. J Constr Steel Res 2017;132:179–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2017.01.018.

[66]   Khatib IF, Mahin SA, Pister KS. Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley …; 1988.

[67]   Kiggins S, Uang CM. Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system. Eng Struct 2006;28:1525–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2005.10.023.

[68]   Jain AK, Redwood RG, Lu F. Seismic response of concentrically braced dual steel frames. Can J Civ Eng 1993;20:672–87. https://doi.org/10.1139/l93-084.

[69]   Giugliano MT, Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V. Failure mode and drift control of MRF-CBF dual systems. Open Constr Build Technol J 2010;4.

[70]   Cen EN. 1-1: EC 8: Design of Structures for Earth. Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions & Rules for Buildings, Comite Europeen de Normalisation, CEN. TC 1998;250:2005.

[71]   Sabelli R. Research on improving the design and analysis of earthquake-resistant steel-braced frames. EERI Oakland; 2001.

[72]   Tremblay R, Tirca L. Behaviour and design of multi-storey zipper concentrically braced steel frames for the mitigation of soft-storey response. Stessa 2003, Routledge; 2003, p. 471–7.

[73]   Jahangir H, Daneshvar Khorram MH, Ghalehnovi M. Influence of geometric parameters on perforated core buckling restrained braces behavior. J Struct Constr Eng 2019;6:75–94. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2018.101904.1359.

[74]   Jia LJ, Li RW, Xiang P, Zhou DY, Dong Y. Resilient steel frames installed with self-centering dual-steel buckling-restrained brace. J Constr Steel Res 2018;149:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2018.07.001.

[75]   Jia L-J, Dong Y, Ge H, Kondo K, Xiang P. Experimental Study on High-Performance Buckling-Restrained Braces with Perforated Core Plates. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2018;19:1940004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455419400042.

[76]   Jia LJ, Ge H, Xiang P, Liu Y. Seismic performance of fish-bone shaped buckling-restrained braces with controlled damage process. Eng Struct 2018;169:141–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2018.05.040.

[77]   Seyed Razzaghi SA, Hatami HR. Evaluating the Performance of the Buckling Restrained Braces in Tall Buildings with Peripherally Braced Frames. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2019;7:21–39. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2018.12407.1213.

[78]   Ozcelik R, Dikiciasik Y, Erdil EF. The development of the buckling restrained braces with new end restrains. J Constr Steel Res 2017;138:208–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2017.07.008.

[79]   Ping X, Mingzhe S, Liang-Jiu J, Minger W, Chun-Lin W. Constitutive Model of Aluminum under Variable-Amplitude Cyclic Loading and Its Application to Buckling-Restrained Braces. J Mater Civ Eng 2018;30:4017304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002183.

[80]   Chou C-C, Liu J-H. Frame and Brace Action Forces on Steel Corner Gusset Plate Connections in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames. Earthq Spectra 2012;28:531–51. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000007.

[81]   Sabelli R, Mahin S, Chang C. Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces. Eng Struct 2003;25:655–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X.

[82]   Hosseini M, Konarangi H. Application of OpenSees Software in modeling and analysis of structures. 4th Edition, Azadeh Publication, Tehran, Iran; 2017.

[83]   Pan P, Li W, Nie X, Deng K, Sun J. Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame equipped with a double-stage yield buckling restrained brace. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 2017;26:e1335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1335.

[84]   M. P, S. S, B. Q, G. M. Research Needs for Seismic Rehabilitation of Sub-standard Buildings using Stiff Rocking Cores. Struct Congr 2013 2013:1683–93. https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/9780784412848.147.

[85]   Qu B, Sanchez JC, Hou H, Pollino M. Improving inter-story drift distribution of steel moment resisting frames through stiff rocking cores. Int J Steel Struct 2016;16:547–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-6023-z.

[86]   Qu Z, Wada A, Motoyui S, Sakata H, Kishiki S. Pin-supported walls for enhancing the seismic performance of building structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012;41:2075–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2175.

[87]   Moghaddam H, Hajirasouliha I, Hosseini Gelekolai SM. Performance-based seismic design of moment resisting steel frames: Adaptive optimisation framework and optimum design load pattern. Structures 2021;33:1690–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.014.

[88]   Hosseini-Gelekolai S, Tabeshpour M. Soft story design in reinforced concrete structure and effect of masonry infill wall. Proceedings, sixth Int. Conf. Seismol. Earthq. Eng. CDROM Tehran, Iran, 2011, p. 1–18.

[89]   Wiebe L, Christopoulos C. Mitigation of Higher Mode Effects in Base-Rocking Systems by Using Multiple Rocking Sections. J Earthq Eng 2009;13:83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813315.

[90]   Qu B, Sanchez-Zamora F, Pollino M. Mitigation of inter-story drift concentration in multi-story steel Concentrically Braced Frames through implementation of Rocking Cores. Eng Struct 2014;70:208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2014.03.032.

[91]   Slovenec D. Seismic Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Improved Design of Sub-Standard Steel Concentrically Braced Frame Buildings. Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies, 2015.

[92]   Li Y-W, Wang Y-Z, Wang Y-B. Application of seismic resilient energy-dissipative rocking columns with HSS tension braces in steel frames. Eng Struct 2022;253:113812. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.113812.

[93]   Mottier P, Tremblay R, Rogers C. Seismic behaviour of multi-storey gravity-controlled rocking braced-frame buildings including floor vertical response. J Constr Steel Res 2021;182:106665. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2021.106665.

[94]   Yang TY, Boddapati VK, Al-Janabi MAQ, Tung DP. Seismic performance of controlled-rocking concentrically braced frames designed by the equivalent energy procedure. Eng Struct 2021;237:112209. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.112209.

[95]   Jafari A, Ghasemi MR, Akbarzadeh Bengar H, Hassani B. Modeling of Dynamic Behavior and Estimation of Damage Incurred by Self-Centering Rocking Walls. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2016;4:93–108. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2017.10565.1169.

[96]   Qu B, Sanchez-Zamora F, Pollino M, Hou H. Rehabilitation of steel concentrically braced frames with rocking cores for improved performance under near-fault ground motions. Adv Struct Eng 2016;20:940–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216668101.

[97]   Derek S, Alireza S, Michael P, Gilberto M, Bing Q. Hybrid Testing of the Stiff Rocking Core Seismic Rehabilitation Technique. J Struct Eng 2017;143:4017083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001814.

[98]   Hu S, Wang W, Qu B. Enhancing seismic performance of tension-only concentrically braced beam-through frames through implementation of rocking cores. Eng Struct 2018;169:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2018.05.035.

[99]   Jahangir H, Khatibinia M, Kavousi M. Application of Contourlet Transform in Damage Localization and Severity Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Slabs. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 2021;5:39–68. https://doi.org/10.22115/SCCE.2021.282138.1301.

[100]  O’Reilly GJ, Goggins J. Experimental testing of a self-centring concentrically braced steel frame. Eng Struct 2021;238:111521. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.111521.

[101]  Gholami M, Zare E, Gorji Azandariani M, Moradifard R. Seismic behavior of dual buckling-restrained steel braced frame with eccentric configuration and post-tensioned frame system. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2021;151:106977. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2021.106977.

[102]  Takeuchi T, Chen X, Matsui R. Seismic performance of controlled spine frames with energy-dissipating members. J Constr Steel Res 2015;114:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2015.07.002.

[103]  R. EM, Xiang M, Helmut K, David M, Sarah B, F. HJ, et al. Design Concepts for Controlled Rocking of Self-Centering Steel-Braced Frames. J Struct Eng 2014;140:4014082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001047.

[104]  R. EM, Xiang M, Helmut K, G. DG, F. HJ. Quasi-Static Cyclic Behavior of Controlled Rocking Steel Frames. J Struct Eng 2014;140:4014083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001005.

[105]  Hu S, Wang W, Alam MS, Qu B. Improving the Seismic Performance of Beam-through Concentrically Braced Frames Using Energy-absorbing Rocking Core. J Earthq Eng 2020:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1813660.

[106]  Hu S, Wang W, Qu B, Shahria Alam M. Self-centering energy-absorbing rocking core system with friction spring damper: Experiments, modeling and design. Eng Struct 2020;225:111338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.111338.

[107]  Hu S, Wang W, Qu B, Alam MS. Development and validation test of a novel Self-centering Energy-absorbing Dual Rocking Core (SEDRC) system for seismic resilience. Eng Struct 2020;211:110424. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.110424.

[108]  Hu S, Wang W, Qu B. Seismic evaluation of low-rise steel building frames with self-centering energy-absorbing rigid cores designed using a force-based approach. Eng Struct 2020;204:110038. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2019.110038.

[109]  Hu S, Wang W. Seismic design and performance evaluation of low-rise steel buildings with self-centering energy-absorbing dual rocking core systems under far-field and near-fault ground motions. J Constr Steel Res 2021;179:106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2021.106545.

[110]  Li J, Wang W, Qu B. Seismic design of low-rise steel building frames with self-centering panels and steel strip braces. Eng Struct 2020;216:110730. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.110730.

[111]  Steele TC, Wiebe LDA. Collapse risk of controlled rocking steel braced frames with different post-tensioning and energy dissipation designs. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2017;46:2063–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2892.

[112]  Steele TC, Wiebe LDA. Collapse risk of controlled rocking steel braced frames considering buckling and yielding of capacity-protected frame members. Eng Struct 2021;237:111999. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.111999.

[113]  Qiu C, Zhang Y, Li H, Qu B, Hou H, Tian L. Seismic performance of Concentrically Braced Frames with non-buckling braces: A comparative study. Eng Struct 2018;154:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2017.10.075.

[114]  Nazarimofrad E, Shokrgozar A. Seismic performance of steel braced frames with self-centering buckling-restrained brace utilizing superelastic shape memory alloys. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 2019;28:e1666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1666.

[115]  Ghowsi AF, Sahoo DR. Seismic response of SMA-based self-centering buckling-restrained braced frames under near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2020;139:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2020.106397.