پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 610 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,029 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,942 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,400 |
A scientometric study of the scientific output of top Iranian researchers in medical sciences | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 15، شماره 5، مرداد 2024، صفحه 169-175 اصل مقاله (500.41 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2022.27902.3753 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mousa Yaminfirooz* 1؛ Somayeh Esbakian2؛ Zahra Karimkhani3؛ Hemmat Gholinia4 | ||
| 1Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran | ||
| 2Vice-Chancellery for Research & Technology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. | ||
| 3Expert of Library Affairs and Cooperation of Urmia Public Libraries, Urmia, Iran | ||
| 4Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 02 مرداد 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 31 شهریور 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Scientometrics indicators are used to assess scientists, universities, and research institutes for scientific policy-making. The aim of this research was to assess the status of top Iranian medical researchers using scientometric indicators. The study was carried out using scientometric methods. The statistical population included the top 500 Iranian researchers in the field of medicine who were ranked in the Iranian Scientometric Information Database (ISID) based on some scientometric indicators. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software and Pearson's correlation coefficient, stepwise regression analysis, and Chi-square tests were applied for data analysis. Findings revealed that each researcher had an average h index of 24.04, g index of 40.15, and i10 index of 90.79. There was a positive significant relationship between the number of internationally-collaborated papers and the number of citations received (r = .606, p<.01). The stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the three variables of paper number, citation counts and mean citation rate determined 72% of the changes in the h-index. It can be concluded that researchers publishing more papers are more likely to be cited. However, their scientometric indexes are not always better than those of other scientists. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Scientometric indicators؛ Top medical researchers؛ Iranian Scientometric Information Database (ISID)؛ Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] A. Ashfaq, R. Kalagara, and N. Wasif, H-index and academic rank in general surgery and surgical specialties in the United States, J. Surg. Res. 229 (2018), 108–113. [2] I.N. Atyunkina and A.R. Safiullin, A comparative study of the development of methodological approaches to competition research based on scientometric SciVerse Scopus indicators, Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. (2022). 10.22075/ijnaa.2021.25422.3017 [3] F. Azadeh, S.J. Ghazi Mirsaeid, M. Gharib and A. Nabiolahi, Survey on the status of indexing Latin approved medical journals in Iran in major global indexes, J. Payavard Salamat 11 (2017), no. 1, 57–67. [4] A. BahmanAbadi and J. Bashiri, The correlation study of the H-Index and academic rank of researchers in the Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Agricul. Inf. Sci. Technol. 4 (2020), no. 2, 1-9. [5] R. Costas and M. Bordons, Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level, Scientometrics 77 (2008), no. 2, 267–288. [6] S.N. Dhamdhere, Cumulative citations index, h-index and i10-index (research metrics) of an educational institute: A case study, Int. J. Library Inf. Sci. 10 (2018), no. 1, 1–9. [7] M. Erfanmanesh and V. Rohani, Correlation among scholarly and social influence measures of researchers: A case study of scientometrics research, Library Inf. Sci. 16 (2014), no. 4, 145–171. [8] M.A. Erfanmanesh, The impact of international research collaboration on the quality of scholarly output of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, J. Health Admin. 20 (2017), no. 69, 42-56. [9] A. Gershoni, I. Vainer, O. Reitblat, F.B. Mimouni, E. Livny, E.Z. Blumenthal, R. Ehrlich, and M. Mimouni, Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States, BMC Health Serv. Res. 19 (2019), no. 1, 1–9. [10] H. A. Gorji, L. Roustaazad, L. Asghari, R. Atlasi, F. Shokraneh, and A. Bazrafshan, Ranking of Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IUMS) Faculties Using H-Index, G-Index, and m parameter (up to the end of 2008), J. Health Admin. 13 (2011), no. 42, 17–24. [11] M. Kalcioglu, Y. Ileri, O. Ozdamar, U. Yilmaz, and M. Tekin, Evaluation of the academic productivity of the top 100 worldwide physicians in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery using the Google Scholar h-index as the bibliometrics ranking system, J. Laryngology Otology 132 (2018), no. 12, 1097–1101. [12] L. Karami, M. Pirhaghi, and A. Saboury, Conventional and new Indicators for scientometric, Sci. Cultivation 6 (2016), no. 1, 6–13. [13] M. Koorki, A. Isfandyari–Moghaddam, and B. Bayat, Evaluation of Research Outputs at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Based on the Hirsch Index and m Parameter: A Scientometric Study, Avicenna J. Clinic. Med. 23 (2017), no. 4, 323–335. [14] P. Kpolovie and E. Onoshagbegbe, Research Productivity: h-Index and i10-Index of academics in Nigerian universities, Int. J. Quant. Qual. Res. Meth. 5 (2017), no. 2, 62-123. [15] W.Y. Low, K.H. Ng, M. Kabir, A.P. Koh, and J. Sinnasamy, Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia, Scientometrics 98 (2014), no. 2, 1521–1533. [16] A. Mohammadbeigi, N. Mohammadsalehi, M. Hozoori, S. Arsangjang, and N. Khaleghi, Citation analysis of scientific documents of Qom University of Medical Sciences using scientometric methods up to July 2014, Iran, Qom Univer. Med. Sci. J. 9 (2015), no. 1, 66–74. [17] M. Naderi, Evaluation of Hirsch Index (H-index) in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences in 2015, JRUMS 15 (2016), no. 1, 27–36. [18] M. Pitsolanti, F. Papadopoulou, N. Tselios, Evaluation of 50 Greek Science and Engineering University Departments using Google Scholar, arXiv preprint arXiv:170304478. (2017). [19] S. Popovic, Research and writing development in the area of sport science publishing in Montenegro, Sport Mont. 16 (2018), no. 3, 31–36. [20] M. Yaminfirooz and H. Gholinia-Ahangar, Analysis the exploratory factor of evaluating indicators for the researchers’ scientific outputs, Caspian J. Scientomet. 1 (2014), no. 1, 7–12. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 32,333 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 290 |
||