پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 610 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,029 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,956 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,405 |
Designing a model for evaluating the entrepreneurial qualifications of applied science university lecturers | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 15، شماره 6، شهریور 2024، صفحه 123-138 اصل مقاله (379.27 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.30410.4390 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Imran Rozban1؛ Ali Badiezadeh* 1؛ Ali Akbar Garhami1؛ Seyyed Rasool Hosseini2 | ||
| 1Department of Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Educational Management, Farhangian University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 دی 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 19 فروردین 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 31 اردیبهشت 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| There are challenges in the practical method of transitioning knowledge in the academic field, even in the University of Applied Science and Technology, which is necessitate updating the assessment of entrepreneurial competencies of lecturers. Challenges such as poor knowledge of recent information, outdated teaching methods, lack of good communication with industries and, worst of all, poor quality of dissemination of knowledge, make it difficult achievement of universities vision of development. This research was conducted during doctoral program research with the aim of developing a model for evaluating the entrepreneurial competencies of university lecturers and specifically at the University of Applied Science and Technology. the mixed method of research was employed in which initially important components of the model were extracted using the grounded theory technique and then the developed model was finalized and each factor was weighted by the AHP multi-criteria analysis. Due to the large length of analysis, this paper is narrowed to the important components of the proposed model and also the data evaluation process by the AHP technique. Data evaluated by the AHP technique was collected through a pairwise comparison questionnaire collected from entire 36 informed respondents. The result provides a practical model of evaluating the entrepreneurial competencies of the university lecturer and in general, the three main factors of individual competencies, competencies in social communication, and also competencies in analyzing and decision-making were classified as main categories, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Lecturer' Entrepreneurial Competencies؛ University of Applied Science and Technology؛ Evaluation Model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Z. Abazari, M. Shariatmadari, F. Hamidifar and B. Shoghi, The presentation of professional competencies appropriate pattern of faculty members of Islamic Azad University branches at Tehran City, Educ. Dev. Judishapur 12 (2021), no. 1, 75–87. [2] H. Abedi, A. Ahmedabadi and D. Ghorooneh, Identify professional needs associated with the teaching of faculty members and Teachers at the Farhangian University, Quart. J. Teacher Educ. 1 (2017), no. 4, 9–43. [3] V.A. Adolf, D.V. Grak, K.V. Adolf, S.S. Sitnichuk and A.I. Kondratyuk, The professional competence of general education teachers in the context of digitalized education, Psycho. Educ. 58 (2021), no. 3, 228–235. [4] B.M. Baxtiyorovna, Ways to develop professional competence of future teachers, Int. Sci. Res. J. 2 (2021), no. 4, 118–124. [5] G.A. Boysen, Research and teaching qualifications for faculty positions in psychology at 4-year colleges and universities, Teach. Psycho. 48 (2021), no. 1, 41–47. [6] P. Boroomand, N. Khani and P. Boroomand, Investigating the relationship between voluntary activity and the creation of entrepreneurial intention with the mediating effect of training entrepreneurship skills of volunteers participating in the leading campaign project, Karafan 19 (2022), no. 2, 267–288. [7] A.B. Darani, M. Daraei and S. Farahbakhs, Analyzing and validating the competences of the teachers profession based on the model, J. Contemp. Issues Bus. Govern. 27 (2021), no. 3, 2360. [8] B.L. Golden and Q. Wang, An Alternative Measure of Consistency, B. L. Golden, A. Wasil & P.T. Harker (eds.) Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies, Springer Verlag, New York, 1990, pp. 68–81. [9] S.D. Haji Mirrahimi and S.M. Hosseini, Strategies to obtain the professional competencies and to investigate professional and educational needs of educations in agricultural higher education institutes in Iran, J. Agricul. Sci. 9 (2003), no. 1, 125–145. [10] N. Jalaliyoon, N.A. Bakar and H. Taherdoost, Accomplishment of critical success factor in organization; using analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag. 1 (2012), no. 1, 1–9. [11] H. Kargar Shouroki and Z. Dehqan, Effectiveness of the value chain of skill learning from information and communication technology, Karafan 19 (2022), no. Special Issue, 61–76. [12] A. Khodamoradi and M. Maghsoudi, Development and validation of the English language teacher competencies questionnaire, Language Translat. Stud. 53 (2019), no.1, 167–195. [13] M. Krejnus, J. Stofkova, K.R. Stofkova and V. Binasova, The use of the DEA method for measuring the efficiency of electronic public administration as part of the digitization of the economy and society, Appl. Sci. 13 (2023), no. 6, 3672. [14] M.C. Lee, A method of performance evaluation by using the analytic network process and balanced score card, Int. Conf. Convergence Inf. Technol., 2007. [15] S. Levander, E. Forsberg, S. Lindblad and G.J. Bjurhammer, Typecasting in the Recruitment of Full Professors, Peer review in an Era of Evaluation, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2022, pp. 327–346. [16] Y. Maroofi, Determining the weight of teaching components to evaluate the performance of faculty members of the country’s universities based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, J. Iran. Higher Educ. 3 (2011), no. 4, 1–19. [17] H. Pourhaji, E. Alidoost Ghafarakhi and M. Hamidi, Identifying and ranking effective behavioral factors on students’ entrepreneurship in Iranian Physical Education Schools, Karafan 19 (2022), no. 2, 289–308. [18] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980. [19] M. Sakaki, M.H. Mirzamohammadi and M. Sobhaninejad, Analyzing the professional qualifications of faculty members in the field of evaluating educational progress, J. Educ. Stud. 17 (2021), 12–23. [20] J. Tabatabai, F. Delawar, A. Nur and M. Asgari, Compilation and validation of the evaluation process model for the promotion of faculty members, Educ. Sci. 27 (2019), no. 2, 253–276. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 18,404 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 149 |
||