Predicting agents’ investment behavior using game theory and bankruptcy problem

[1] F. Babaei, H. Navidi, and S. Moretti, A bankruptcy approach to solve the fixed cost allocation problem in transport systems, Top 30 (2022), no. 2, 332–358.

[2] G. Bergantinos and J.D. Moreno-Ternero, Sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports events, Manag. Sci. 66 (2020), no. 6, 2417–2431.

[3] V. Ginsburgh and J.D. Moreno-Ternero, Compensation schemes for learning a Lingua Franca in the European Union, World Econ. 41 (2018), no. 7, 1775–1789.

[4] E. Karagozoglu, A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate, Ann. Oper. Res. 217 (2014), no. 1, 299–318.

[5] O. Kıbrıs and A. Kıbrıs, On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws, Games Econ. Behav. 80 (2013), 85–99.

[6] O. Morgenstern and J. von Neumann, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, 1953.

[7] R.B. Myerson, Game Theory, Harvard University Press, 2013.

[8] H. Navidi, S.ketabchi, and M. Mesi-Bidgoli, An Introduction to Game Theory, Shahed University, 2011. [In Persian]

[9] H. Navidi and F. Babaei, Cooperative Game Theory, Shahed University, 2019. [In Persian]

[10] B. O’Neill, A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud, Math. Soc. Sci. 2 (1982), no. 2, 345–371.

[11] W. Thomson, Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: A survey, Math. Soc. Sci. 45 (2003), no. 3, 249–297.

[12] W. Thomson, Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update, Math. Soc. Sci. 74 (2015), 41–59.