پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 610 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,028 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,901 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,366 |
Flexible and robust security-constrained unit commitment in the presence of wind power generation uncertainty | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 15، شماره 11، بهمن 2024، صفحه 65-81 اصل مقاله (1.94 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.31589.4677 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Ali Sadeghi* 1؛ Amir Abdollahi2؛ Morteza Jadidoleslam Zeidabadi3؛ Shahriar Abbasi4 | ||
| 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Tehran Branch, Technical and Vocational University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran | ||
| 3Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Sirjan University of Technology, Sirjan, Iran | ||
| 4Electrical and Computer Department, Kermanshah Brannch, Technical and Vocational University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 05 فروردین 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 20 مرداد 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 شهریور 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Unreliable resources in conventional power systems have created new challenges for the users of these systems. These sources of production, including wind and solar sources, with a significant share in the power generation of many power systems, cause problems in the safe and stable operation of power systems due to uncertainty. Therefore, it is very important to provide a method or model for safe and stable operation of power systems. The main innovation of this paper is to present a new SCUC model to maximize the flexibility of the system along with reducing the operating cost in the form of a security-constrained multi-level robust optimization problem in the presence of wind uncertainty sources. Also, a set of demand response programs and rapid response hybrid cycle units are used as sources of flexibility. Accordingly, the tolerable range of uncertainty and system slope reservation is developed with a low-cost combination and with the commitment to flexible covering resources. The desired optimization problem has been solved with the help of the NCCG algorithm and the MILP method. The efficiency and reliability of this proposed model have been simulated and evaluated in IEEE 6-bus and 118-bus standard power systems, and the simulation results confirm the technical and economic efficiency of this model. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| SCUC؛ Wind Power Generation؛ Flexibility؛ Robustness؛ Multilevel Optimization؛ Demand Response | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] J.M. Alemany, D.C.A. Moitre, H. Pinto, and F. Magnago, Short-term scheduling of combined cycle units using mixed integer linear programming solution, Energy Power Engin. 5 (2013), 161–170. [2] M.I. Alizadeh, M.P. Moghaddam, and N. Amjady, Multistage multiresolution robust unit commitment with nondeterministic flexible ramp considering load and wind variabilities, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 9 (2017), no. 2, 872–883. [3] M.I. Alizadeh, M. Parsa Moghaddam, and N. Amjady, Flexibility contribution of heat ventilation and air conditioning loads in a multi-stage robust unit commitment with non-deterministic variability-oriented ramp reserves, IET Gen. Transmis. Distrib. 12 (2018), no. 12, 3037–3045. [4] D. Bertsimas, E. Litvinov, X.A. Sun, J. Zhao, and T. Zheng, Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28 (2012), no. 1, 52–63. [5] X. Chen, J. Layke, L.V.W. McGrory, J. Corfee-Morlot, and K. Kennedy, Our solar future—Roadmap to mobilize USD 1 trillion by 2030, WRI: World Resources Institute, U.S.A. 2022. [6] R. Chen, J. Wang, A. Botterud, and H. Sun, Wind power providing flexible ramp product, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32 (2016), no. 3, 2049–2061. [7] Cobos, N.G., J.M. Arroyo, N. Alguacil and A. Street, Robust energy and reserve scheduling under wind uncertainty considering fast-acting generators, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 10 (2018), no. 4, 2142–2151. [8] N.G. Cobos, J.M. Arroyo, N. Alguacil, and J. Wang, Robust energy and reserve scheduling considering bulk energy storage units and wind uncertainty, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33 (2018), no. 5, 5206–5216. [9] J.J. Conti, P.D. Holtberg, J.A. Beamon, A.M. Schaal, J.C. Ayoub and J.T. Turnure, Annual energy outlook 2014, US Energy Info. Admin. 2 (2014). [10] C. Dai, Y. Chen, F. Wang, J. Wan and L. Wu, A configuration-component-based hybrid model for combined-cycle units in MISO day-ahead market, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34 (2018), no. 2, 883–896. [11] J. Dong, S. Han, X. Shao, L. Tang, R. Chen, L. Wu, C. Zheng, Z. Li and H. Li, Day-ahead wind-thermal unit commitment considering historical virtual wind power data, Energy 235 (2021), p. 121324. [12] X. Fang, L. Bai, F. Li and B.-M. Hodge, Hybrid component and configuration model for combined-cycle units in unit commitment problem, J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 6 (2018), no. 6, 1332–1337. [13] G. Ferrari-Trecate, E. Gallestey, P. Letizia, M. Spedicato, M. Morari, and M. Antoine, Modeling and control of co-generation power plants: A hybrid system approach, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12 (2004), no. 5, 694–705. [14] D. Gielen, R. Gorini, R. Leme, G. Prakash, N.Wagner, L. Janeiro, S. Collins, M. Kadir, E. Asmelash, R. Ferroukhi, and U. Lehr, World energy transitions outlook: 1.5◦ c pathway, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2021. [15] E. Heydarian-Forushani, M.E. Hamedani Golshan, M. Shafie-khah, and P. Siano, Optimal operation of emerging flexible resources considering sub-hourly flexible ramp product, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 9 (2017), no. 2, 916–929. [16] B. Hu, L. Wu and M. Marwali, On the robust solution to SCUC with load and wind uncertainty correlations, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29 (2014), no. 6, 2952–2964. [17] IRENA. Roadmap 2030 Doubling the global share of renewable energy: a roadmap to 2030, International Renewable Energy Agency, Working paper. [18] F. Jabari, H. Arasteh, A. Sheikhi-Fini, H. Ghaebi, M.B. Bannae-Sharifian, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, and M. Mohammadpourfard, A biogas-steam combined cycle for sustainable development of industrial-scale water-power hybrid microgrids: design and optimal scheduling, Biof. Bioprod. Bioref. 16 (2022), no. 1, 172–192. [19] K.-B. Kwon and D. Kim, Enhanced method for considering energy storage systems as ancillary service resources in stochastic unit commitment, Energy 213 (2020),118675. [20] E. Lannoye, D. Flynn, and M. O’Malley, Assessment of power system flexibility: A high-level approach, IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet., IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–8. [21] J. Li, S. Zhou, Y. Xu, M. Zhu and L. Ye, A multi-band uncertainty set robust method for unit commitment with wind power generation, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 131 (2021), 107125. [22] T. Limbu, T. Saha, and J. McDonald, Value-based allocation and settlement of reserves in electricity markets, IET Gen. Transmis. Distrib. 5 (2011), no. 4, 489–495. [23] F. Lu, Z. Yu, Y. Zou, and X. Yang, Energy flexibility assessment of a zero-energy office building with building thermal mass in short-term demand-side management, J. Build. Eng. 50 (2022), 104214. [24] B. Lu and M. Shahidehpour, Short-term scheduling of combined cycle units, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19 (2004), no. 3, 1616–1625. [25] M.S. Misaghian, M. Saffari, M. Kia, A. Heidari, M. Shafie-khah, and J.P.S. Catalao, Tri-level optimization of industrial microgrids considering renewable energy sources, combined heat and power units, thermal and electrical storage systems, Energy 161 (2018), 396–411. [26] F. Moller Andersen, S.G. Jensen, H.V. Larsen, P. Meibom, H. Ravn, K. Skytte, and M. Togeby, Analyses of demand response in Denmark, Risoe National Lab., 2006, No. RISO-R–1565 (EN). [27] N. Navid and G. Rosenwald, Market solutions for managing ramp flexibility with high penetration of renewable resource, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 3 (2012), no. 4, 784–790. [28] N. Navid, G. Rosenwald and D. Chatterjee, Ramp capability for load following in the MISO markets, Midwest Indep. Syst. Oper. 20 (2011). [29] B. Nitve and R. Naik, Steady state analysis of IEEE-6 bus system using PSAT power toolbox, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Innov. Technol. 3 (2014). [30] N. None, Annual energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040, USDOE Energy Information Administration (EI), Washington, DC (United States), Office of Energy Analysis, No. DOE/EIA-0383, 2016. [31] F. Pourahmadi, S.H. Hosseini, P. Dehghanian, E. Shittu and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Uncertainty cost of stochastic producers: Metrics and impacts on power grid flexibility, IEEE Trans. Engin. Manag. 69 (2020), no. 3, 708–719. [32] I.E.A. Renewables, Analysis and Forecast to 2026, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2021. [33] S.P. Roukerd, A. Abdollahi, and M. Rashidinejad, Uncertainty-based unit commitment and construction in the presence of fast ramp units and energy storages as flexible resources considering enigmatic demand elasticity, J. Energy Storage 29 (2020), 101290. [34] A.A. Salimi, A. Karimi, and Y. Noorizadeh, Simultaneous operation of wind and pumped storage hydropower plants in a linearized security-constrained unit commitment model for high wind energy penetration, J. Energy Storage 22 (2019), 318–330. [35] S. Saranya and B. Saravanan, Effect of emission in SMES based unit commitment using modified Henry gas solubility optimization, J. Energy Storage 29 (2020), 101380. [36] M.M. Servan, P.A. Aguirre and M.G. Marcovecchio, Simultaneous optimal short term SCUC solution and power system redesign with real gap decomposition technique, Comput. Chem. Eng. 150 (2021), 107338. [37] S.S. Soman, H. Zareipour, O. Malik, and P. Mandal, A review of wind power and wind speed forecasting methods with different time horizons, North Amer. Power Symp., IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–8. [38] E. Taibi, T. Nikolakakis, L. Gutierrez, C. Fernandez, J. Kiviluoma, S. Rissanen, and T.J. Lindroos, Power system flexibility for the energy transition: Part 1, overview for policymakers, Abu Dhabi, 2018. [39] N. Troy, D. Flynn and M. O'Malley, Multi-mode operation of combined-cycle gas turbines with increasing wind penetration, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27 (2011), no. 1, 484–492. [40] H. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, A. Alabdulwahab, and A. Abusorrah, Thermal generation flexibility with ramping costs and hourly demand response in stochastic security-constrained scheduling of variable energy sources, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (2014), no. 6, 2955–2964. [41] H. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li and W. Tian, Chance-constrained day-ahead scheduling in stochastic power system operation, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29 (2014), no. 4, 1583–1591. [42] H.B. Xiong, Y.H. Shi, Z. Chen, C. Guo and Y. Ding, Multi-stage robust dynamic unit commitment based on pre-extended-fast robust dual dynamic programming, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 38 (2022), no. 3, 2411–2422. [43] H. Ye, Surrogate affine approximation based co-optimization of transactive flexibility, uncertainty, and energy, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33 (2018), no. 4, 4084–4096. [44] J. Zhao, T. Zheng and E. Litvinov, Variable resource dispatch through do-not-exceed limit, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (2014), no. 2, 820–828. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 948 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 259 |
||