پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 653 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,524 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,449,136 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 47,909,134 |
Stabilization of Soft Clay Soil by the Reinforcement of Single Bottom Ash Silica Fume (BASF) Column | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 12، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 35، آبان 2024، صفحه 117-131 اصل مقاله (1.18 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2024.32181.1925 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ng Jun Shen* 1؛ Muzamir Hasan2؛ Tan Kah Yee1 | ||
| 1Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuhraya Tun Razak 26300 Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of+ Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuhraya Tun Razak 26300 Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 11 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 26 بهمن 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 اردیبهشت 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This research examined the utilization of bottom ash mixed with silica fume in the ground improvement technique by constructing columns beneath the soft clay. Utilizing the bottom ash was an effective method and easily available in the market and the application of silica fume in the study improved the result through its pozzolanic characteristics. The vibro-replacement method was implemented during the bottom ash column installation process. The properties of the materials involved in the research were examined by suitable geotechnical tests complying with relevant standards. The important parameter, shear strength was accessed by conducting the Unconfined Compression Test (UCT). In this study, a total of seven (7) batches of soil samples were involved comprising the control sample. From each batch, it had five (5) soil samples which included the 14 mm and 20 mm diameter of column with the height of 60 mm, 80 mm, and 100 mm. From the results of shear strength improvement, the 14 mm diameter column with height penetrating ratios of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 were showing 58.97%, 88.56%, and 69.81% respectively. The next column design which had the 20 mm diameter with the height penetrating ratio of 0.8, recorded the highest improvement of 38.73%, followed by 1.0 and 0.6 which resulted in 32.81% and 19.19% respectively. The use of correlation technique had streamlined the complexity of the independent variables and verified the reliability of the results through the R2 value. In summary, the improvement in shear strength was significantly influenced by the column design. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Soil improvement؛ Ground improvement؛ Expansive clay؛ Shear strength؛ Bottom ash | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Wang W, Deng X, Wang Y, Peng L, Yu Z. Impacts of infrastructure construction on ecosystem services in new-type urbanization area of North China Plain. Resour Conserv Recycl 2022;185:106376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106376.
[2] Mohsen Alawag A, Salah Alaloul W, Liew MS, Ali Musarat M, Baarimah AO, Saad S, et al. Critical Success Factors Influencing Total Quality Management In Industrialised Building System: A Case Of Malaysian Construction Industry. Ain Shams Eng J 2023;14:101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101877.
[3] Lim G, Li C, Ji X. Chinese financial statecraft in Southeast Asia: an analysis of China’s infrastructure provision in Malaysia. Pacific Rev 2022;35:647–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1868556.
[4] bin Hasan M, binti Yusuf N, binti Noor Shahrudeen NA, Kassim AMH. Strength of soft clay reinforced with group crushed polypropylene (PP) columns. Electron J Geotech Eng 2015;20:12291–308.
[5] Pruett RJ. Kaolin deposits and their uses: Northern Brazil and Georgia, USA. Appl Clay Sci 2016;131:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.01.048.
[6] Zainuddin AN, Jamal SN, Mukri M, Che Azmi NA, Che Lat D. Study of Nano Koalinite As Additives in Kaolinite Clay To Develop New Clay Liner Design. Int J Appl Eng Res 2015;10.
[7] Dey AK, Debnath P. Empirical approach for bearing capacity prediction of geogrid-reinforced sand over vertically encased stone columns floating in soft clay using support vector regression. Neural Comput Appl 2020;32:6055–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04092-1.
[8] Dhianty E, Mochtar IB. Method of removing secondary compression on clay using preloading. MATEC Web Conf 2018;195:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819503006.
[9] Elsawy MBD, Alsharekh MF, Shaban M. Modeling Undrained Shear Strength of Sensitive Alluvial Soft Clay Using Machine Learning Approach. Appl Sci 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910177.
[10] Hilal N, Hadzima-Nyarko M. Improvement of eco-efficient self-compacting concrete manufacture by recycling high quantity of waste materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2021;28:53282–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14222-9.
[11] Rezaei-Hosseinabadi MJ, Bayat M, Nadi B, Rahimi A. Sustainable utilisation of steel slag as granular column for ground improvement in geotechnical projects. Case Stud Constr Mater 2022;17:e01333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01333.
[12] Verma H, Ray A, Rai R, Gupta T, Mehta N. Ground improvement using chemical methods: A review. Heliyon 2021;7:e07678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07678.
[13] Ghanizadeh AR, Ghanizadeh A, Asteris PG, Fakharian P, Armaghani DJ. Developing bearing capacity model for geogrid-reinforced stone columns improved soft clay utilizing MARS-EBS hybrid method. Transp Geotech 2023;38:100906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100906.
[14] Haddad A, Shahverdi M. Evaluation of Recycled Materials as Aggregate of End Bearing and Floating Stone Columns: a Comparative Study. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2021;9:61–74. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2021.21286.1443.
[15] Zaini MSI, Hasan M. Effect of Optimum Utilization of Silica Fume and Lime On the Stabilization of Problematic Soils. Int J Integr Eng 2023;15:352–66. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2023.15.01.032.
[16] Alipour R, Aminpour H, Dehghanzadeh A. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering Investigating the effect of soil improvement by micropile method in marl soil: a case study of Bidboland, Khuzestan. Civ Eng 2023;54:925–8. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2022.20705.7506.
[17] Correia NS, Rocha SA, Lodi PC, McCartney JS. Shear strength behavior of clayey soil reinforced with polypropylene fibers under drained and undrained conditions. Geotext Geomembranes 2021;49:1419–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.005.
[18] Abubakar AU, Baharudin KS. Tanjung bin coal bottom ash: From waste to concrete material. Adv Mater Res 2013;705:163–8. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.705.163.
[19] Ramzi NIR, Shahidan S, Maarof MZ, Ali N. Physical and Chemical Properties of Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) from Tanjung Bin Power Plant. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2016;160. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/160/1/012056.
[20] Raju R, Paul MM, Aboobacker KA. Strength performance of concrete using bottom ash as fine aggregate. Int J Res Eng Technol 2014;2:111–22.
[21] Shen NJ, Hasan M, Amina N, Hashim A. The Influence of Bottom Ash Column in the Geotechnical Properties Enhancement of Soft Clay Soil n.d.;5:1–13.
[22] Nikravan M, Ramezanianpnour AA, Maknoon R. Technological and environmental behavior of petrochemical incineration bottom ash (PI-BA) in cement-based using nano-SiO2 and silica fume (SF). Constr Build Mater 2018;191:1042–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.135.
[23] Khalhen IA, Aghayari R. Impact Resistance of Concrete Containing LLDPE– Waste Tire Rubber and Silica Fume. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2023;11:60–75. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2022.23456.1511.
[24] Zaini MSI, Hasan M. Effectiveness of Silica Fume Eggshell Ash and Lime Use on the Properties of Kaolinitic Clay. Int J Eng Technol Innov 2023;13:337–52. https://doi.org/10.46604/ijeti.2023.11936.
[25] Zaini MSI, Hasan M, Yie LS, Masri KA, Jaya RP, Hyodo M, et al. the Effect of Utilizing Silica Fume and Eggshell Ash on the Geotechnical Properties of Soft Kaolin Clay. J Teknol 2022;84:159–70. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v84.17115.
[26] Pakbaz MS, Alipour R. Influence of cement addition on the geotechnical properties of an Iranian clay. Appl Clay Sci 2012;67–68:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.07.006.
[27] Papapetrou N, Sciences M. Improving Undrained Shear Strength of Very Soft Kaolin Clay with Different Admixtures 2023.
[28] Egbe JG, Ewa DE, Ubi SE, Ikwa GB, Tumenayo OO. Application of multilinear regression analysis in modeling of soil properties for geotechnical civil engineering works in Calabar South. Niger J Technol 2018;36:1059. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i4.10.
[29] Hasan M Bin, Marto AB, Hyodo M, Makhtar AM Bin. The strength of soft clay reinforced with singular and group bottom ash columns. Electron J Geotech Eng 2011;16 N:1215–27.
[30] Najjar SS, Sadek S, Maakaroun T. Effect of Sand Columns on the Undrained Load Response of Soft Clays. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 2010;136:1263–77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000328.
[31] Alipour R, Heshmati R AA, Karimiazar J, Esazadefar N, Asghari-Kaljahi E, Bahmani SH. Resistance and swelling of Tabriz marl soils stabilised using nano-silica and nano-alumina. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 2022;176:326–39. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00016.
[32] Najjar SS. A State-of-the-Art Review of Stone/Sand-Column Reinforced Clay Systems. Geotech Geol Eng 2013;31:355–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9603-5.
[33] Murugesan S, Rajagopal K. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation. Geotext Geomembranes 2006;24:349–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001.
[34] Tandel YK, Solanki CH, Desai AK. Laboratory experimental analysis on encapsulated stone column. Arch Civ Eng 2013;59:359–79. https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2013-0020. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 616 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 156 |
||