پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 675 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,814 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,673,096 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 49,026,716 |
The constructional model of the effects of pricing strategies on the exporting petrochemical products in Iran | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 14، دوره 16، شماره 2، اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 165-176 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.32206.4783 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammademad Mostajerian1؛ Saeid Daei-Karimzadeh* 1؛ Ali Dehghani2؛ Sara Ghobadi2 | ||
| 1Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Economics, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 29 دی 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 بهمن 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study presents a constructional model that explores the effects of pricing strategies on exporting petrochemical products in Iran. The model is based on a comprehensive review of existing literature and case studies and input from industry experts and stakeholders. The constructional model identifies the main pricing strategies that petrochemical companies in Iran use, such as maximizing profits, increasing market share, and maintaining a certain level of quality. The model also considers the impact of external factors such as demand elasticity, market competition, and regulatory constraints on pricing decisions. Using the constructional model, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different pricing strategies in the Iranian petrochemical industry. The model also simulates the impact of different pricing strategies on various stakeholders, including producers, consumers, and the Iranian government. The results of the constructional model suggest that while pricing to maximize profits may lead to short-term gains, it can limit a company's ability to compete in the global market. On the other hand, pricing to increase market share can lead to long-term growth but may require significant investment in research and development. The model also highlights the importance of considering external factors such as demand elasticity and regulatory constraints when making pricing decisions. For example, demand for petrochemical products in Iran may be highly elastic, meaning that small price changes can lead to large changes in demand. Additionally, regulatory constraints such as trade agreements and environmental regulations can significantly impact pricing decisions in the Iranian petrochemical industry. Overall, this paper provides a useful constructional model for analyzing the effects of pricing strategies on exporting petrochemical products in Iran. The findings of this paper can help petrochemical companies in Iran make strategic pricing decisions that take into account both internal and external factors, to ensure their long-term success in the global market. The variables of the study are restrictions of entry into the export market, penetration strategy, market development strategy, and opportunity creation, all of which have effects on product export. Here, the following features are described, penetration strategy (importance coefficient: 0.95), market development strategy (importance coefficient: 0.94 opportunity creation (importance coefficient: 0.9), and the restrictions of entry into the export market (importance coefficient: 0.8). The Alpha Cronbach of the two questionnaires are 0.817, 0.814, in turn, that indicates the appropriate validity. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| constructional model؛ effects of pricing؛ strategies؛ exporting | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] G.J. Avlonitis and K.A. Indounas, Pricing objectives and pricing methods in the services sector, J. Serv. Market. 19 (2005), no. 1, 47–57. [2] I.B. Baalbaki and N.K. Malhotra, Marketing management bases for international market segmentation: An alternate look at the standardization/customization debate, Int. Market. Rev. 10 (1993), no. 1. [3] A.B. Bernard, J. Eaton, J.B. Jensen, and S. Kortum, Plants and productivity in international trade, Amer.ican Econ. Rev. 93 (2003), no. 4, 1268–1290. [4] N.C. Caister, K.S. Govinder and J.G. O’Hara, Solving a nonlinear pde that prices real options using utility based pricing methods, Nonlinear Anal.: Real World Appl. 12 (2011), no. 4, 2408–2415. [5] A. Dolgui and J.-M. Proth, Pricing strategies and models, Ann. Rev. Control, 34 (2010), 101–110. [6] S.P. Douglas and C.S. Craig, Evolution of Global Marketing Strategy: Scale, Scope, and Synergy, Read. Int. Bus.:A Decision Approach, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. [7] N.S. Economides, The economics of trademarks, Trademark Rep. 78 (1988), 523. [8] P.K. Goldberg and M.M. Knetter, Measuring the intensity of competition in export markets, J. Int. Econ. 47 (1999), no. 1, 27–60. [9] M. Hanlon and S. Heitzman, A review of tax research, J. Account. Econ. 50 (2010), no. 2–3, 127–178. [10] M. Kienzler, Does managerial personality influence pricing practices under uncertainty?, J. Product Brand Manag. 26 (2017), no. 7, 771–784. [11] M. Kienzler and C. Kowalkowski, Pricing strategy: A review of 22 years of marketing research, J. Bus. Res. 78 (2017), 101–110. [12] P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, Principal of Marketing, 10th Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002. [13] J.D. Loecker and F. Warzynski, Markups and firm-level export status, Amer. Econ. Rev. 102 (2012), no. 6, 2437–2471. [14] P. Michael, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: FreePress, 1985. [15] M. Miraldo, Reference pricing and firms’ pricing strategies, J. Health Econ. 28 (2009), no. 1, 176–197. [16] M.B. Myers and S.T. Cavusgil, Export pricing strategy-performance relationship: A conceptual framework, Adv. Int. Market. 8 (1996), 159–178. [17] E.K. Odongo, N. Agneta, and E.O. Orinda, The impact of global cultural differences on the pricing strategies in United States of America, Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2 (2012), no. 2, 58–68. [18] T.G. Pollock, G. Chen, E.M. Jackson, and D.C. Hambrick, How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms, J. Bus. Ventur. 25 (2010), 6–23. [19] D. Shipley and D. Jobber, Integrative pricing via the pricing wheel, Ind. Market. Manag. 30 (2001), no. 3, 301–314. [20] O. Somervuori, Profiling behavioral pricing research in marketing, J. Product Brand Manag. 23 (2014), no. 6, 462–474. 21] M. Theodosiou, Factors influencing degree of international pricing strategy: An empirical investigation, Glob. Econ. Proc. 2012 (2012), 246–253. [22] J.R. Tybout, Plant and firm-level evidence on “new” trade theories, K. Choi and J. Harrigan (eds.), Handbook of International trade, Oxford: Basil-Blackwell, 2013. [23] C.-H. Wu, Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing, Eur. J. Operat. Res. 222 (2012), 204–215. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 559 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 552 |
||