data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12698/126983dd097b4e87784adf8776e70724c5bd246e" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه سمنان"
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 610 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,029 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,965 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,405 |
Provide a pricing framework for enterprise software as a service (SaaS) | ||
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 16، شماره 3، خرداد 2025، صفحه 35-51 اصل مقاله (385.83 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.32143.4776 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Hamidreza Ranjbari1؛ Mohsen Nazari* 2؛ Saeed Rouhani3 | ||
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Management, Aras International Campus, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
2Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Department of IT Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 02 شهریور 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آبان 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
Product pricing in the current business world is one of the main concerns of companies and organizations active in the field of production, and the rapid and significant progress of information technology and software has also become a reason for pricing in the field of software to become a serious challenge. In this regard, this research has been carried out to provide a hierarchical pricing framework for enterprise software as a service. For this purpose, this research was carried out using a mixed method (qualitative-quantitative), extracting 28 indicators of the desired pattern in the qualitative part using the method of meta-composition and content analysis. The pattern in the quantitative part was obtained using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method. The statistical population in the quantitative section included 16 research experts. The finding of this research is the achievement of a five-level model where the most influential indicators of this model at the fifth level were order compatibility and software performance value and quality. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
pricing؛ software؛ software as a service؛ information technology؛ sales | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] A.W. Baur, A.C. Genova, J. Buhler, and M. Bick, Customer is king? A framework to shift from cost-to value-based pricing in software as a service: The case of business intelligence software, Conf. e-Bus. e-Serv. e-Soc., 2014, pp. 1–13. [2] A. Benlian and T. Hess, Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, Decis. Support Syst. 1 (2011), no. 52, 232–246. [3] D.C. Chou and A.Y. Chou, Software as a Service (SaaS) as an outsourcing model: An economic analysis, Proc. SWDSI’ 8 (2008), 386–391. [4] N.L. Hallberg, The micro-foundations of pricing strategy in industrial markets: A case study in the European packaging industry, J. Bus.Res. 76 (2017), no. 1, 179–188. [5] A. Hinterhuber and S.M. Liozu, The micro-foundations of pricing, J. Bus. Res. 76 (2017), no. 4, 159–162. [6] J. Huang, Pricing strategy for cloud computing services, PhD Dissertation, Singapore Management University, 2014. [7] T. Mather, S. Kumaraswamy, and S. Latif, Cloud Security and Privacy: An Enterprise Perspective on Risks and Compliance, O’Reilly Media, Inc, 2009. [8] M. Mathew and S. Nair, Pricing SaaS models: Perceptions of business service providers and clients, J. Serv. Res. 10 (2010), no. 1, 51–68. [9] M. Nazari, S.V. Tabatabai Koljahi, and A. Mahmoudian, Analysis of pricing methods of MTN Irancell company, Bus. Manag. 6 (2018), no. 2, 164–147. [10] M. Nazari, S.V. Tabatabaie Kalejahi, and O. Mahmoudian, Analyzing pricing strategies of MTN-Irancell, J. Bus. Manag. 2 (2011), no. 4. [11] R.F. Reilly and R.P. Schweihs, Valuing Intangible Assets, McGraw Hill Professional, 1998. [12] M. Roomi, S. Al-Ebrahim, S. Buqrais, and I. Ahmad, Cloud computing pricing models: a survey, Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 5 (2013), no. 6, 93–106. [13] M. Saaksjarvi, A. Lassila, and H. Nordstrom, Evaluating the software as a service business model: From CPU time-sharing to online innovation sharing, IADIS Int. Conf. e-Society, 2005, pp. 177–186. [14] A. Saltan and K. Smolander, Bridging the state-of-the-art and the state-of-the-practice of SaaS pricing: A multi vocal literature review, Inf. Software Technol. 133 (2021), 106510. [15] L. Smith, Valuation of intellectual property, Current Topics in ISM, 2009. [16] I.V.D. Weerd, I.S. Mangula, and S. Brinkkemper, Adoption of software as a service in Indonesia: Examining the influence of organizational factors, Inf. Manag. 7 (2016), no. 53, 915–928. [17] M. Wei, W. Principal, R. Kotagiri, and R. Buyya, Modeling and Optimizing Cloud Computing Service Prices, School of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne, 2019. [18] S. Wilczkowski, The Pricing Decision Process in Software-as-a-Service Companies, UPPSALA UNIVERSITET, 2015. [19] W.W. Wu, Developing an explorative model for SaaS adoption, Expert Syst. Appl. 12 (2011), no. 38, 15057–15064. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 173 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 199 |