Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Retaining Wall Stability: Investigating the Effect of Construction Defects

Rhayma, Noureddine; Khorchani, Mohamed; Breul, Pierre

doi:10.22075/jrce.2024.32797.1964

اداره چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه سمنان

تعداد نشریات	21
تعداد شماره‌ها	643
تعداد مقالات	9,418
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	68,155,534
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	42,291,472

	Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Retaining Wall Stability: Investigating the Effect of Construction Defects
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
مقاله 8، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 37، اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 113-129 اصل مقاله (882.25 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Note
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2024.32797.1964
نویسندگان
Noureddine Rhayma^* ¹؛ Mohamed Khorchani¹؛ Pierre Breul²
¹Assistant Professor, Mechanical Modelling, Energy & Materials (M²EM) Laboratory, LR24ES23, National School of Engineers of Gabes (ENIG), University of Gabes, Tunisia
²Professor, Institut Pascal - UMR CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
تاریخ دریافت: 05 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 17 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 28 تیر 1403
چکیده
The safety evaluation of retaining structures, especially in cases of potential instability or disaster, frequently depends on empirical methods that apply overall safety factors. In this article, an innovative approach employing probabilistic methods to assess the reliability of gravity retaining walls, considering uncertainties in parameters and their inherent variability, has been introduced. This study applies First Order Reliability Method (FORM) to assess the influence of construction defects and soil-structure friction on gravity wall reliability. his approach represents notable progress over traditional empirical methods, which rely on total safety factors and frequently manage uncertainties arbitrarily. The paper is indeed novel as it integrates probabilistic methods into the analysis of gravity retaining wall stability, offering a more nuanced understanding of the reliability of these structures. This contribution seeks to enhance safety assessments and rehabilitation strategies in civil engineering practices, with a focus on addressing uncertainties in geotechnical parameters and construction defects.
تازه های تحقیق
This study integrates probabilistic methods into the analysis of gravity retaining wall stability, providing a more comprehensive assessment of structural safety. We evaluate the probability of failure against three critical modes: overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity, enhancing our understanding of potential failure mechanisms. Through sensitivity analysis, we identify the most influential parameters, allowing for targeted mitigation strategies and improved design practices. Parametric analysis examines the impact of the friction angle between soil and wall, as well as evaluates the effect of construction defects on wall stability, contributing valuable insights for engineering decision-making and risk management.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Gravity retaining wall؛ Reliability analysis؛ Sensitivity؛ FORM method؛ Construction defects

مراجع
[1] Fenton GA, Grifﬁths D V, Williams MB. Reliability of traditional retaining wall design. Geotechnique 2005;55:55–62. [2] Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH. Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J 1999;36:625–39. [3] Baecher GB, Christian JT. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley & Sons; 2005. [4] Phoon K-K. Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: computations and applications. CRC Press; 2008. [5] Sayed S, Dodagoudar GR, Rajagopal K. Finite element reliability analysis of reinforced retaining walls. Geomech Geoengin An Int J 2010;5:187–97. [6] Duncan JM. Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 2000;126:307–16. [7] Christian JT, Ladd CC, Baecher GB. Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. J Geotech Eng 1994;120:2180–207. [8] Tang WH, Stark TD, Angulo M. Reliability in back analysis of slope failures. Soils Found 1999;39:73–80. [9] Low BK, Zhang J, Tang WH. Efficient system reliability analysis illustrated for a retaining wall and a soil slope. Comput Geotech 2011;38:196–204. [10] Kumar A, Roy P. Reliability analysis of retaining wall using imprecise probability. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Struct. Saf. Reliab. Vienna, Austria, 2017, p. 6–10. [11] Sujith M, Menon D, Dodagoudar G. Reliability analysis and design of cantilever RC retaining walls against sliding failure. Int J Geotech Eng 2011;5:131–41. [12] Zhou XP, Xie YX, Huang XC, He H. Antislip stability analysis of gravity retaining wall by probabilistic approach. Int J Geomech 2019;19:4019045. [13] Low BK. Reliability-based design applied to retaining walls. Geotechnique 2005;55:63–75. [14] Castaldo P, Gino D, Marano GC, Mancini G. Aleatory uncertainties with global resistance safety factors for non-linear analyses of slender reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct 2022;255:113920. [15] Mustafa R, Samui P, Kumari S, Mohamad ET, Bhatawdekar RM. Probabilistic analysis of gravity retaining wall against bearing failure. Asian J Civ Eng 2023;24:3099–119. [16] Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley & sons; 1996. [17] Bowles JE, Guo Y. Foundation analysis and design. vol. 5. McGraw-Hill New York; 1996. [18] Meyerhof GG. Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Can Geotech J 1963;1:16–26. [19] Mustafa R, Samui P, Kumari S. Reliability analysis of gravity retaining wall using hybrid ANFIS. Infrastructures 2022;7:121. [20] Rhayma N, Bressolette P, Breul P, Fogli M, Saussine G. A probabilistic approach for estimating the behavior of railway tracks. Eng Struct 2011;33:2120–33. [21] Rhayma N, Bressolette P, Breul P, Fogli M, Saussine G. Reliability analysis of maintenance operations for railway tracks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013;114:12–25. [22] Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 1999;36:612–24. [23] Harr ME. Reliability-based design in civil engineering. McGraw-Hil. 1987. [24] Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural reliability methods. vol. 178. Wiley New York; 1996. [25] Hasofer AM. An exact and invarient first order reliability format. J Eng Mech Div, Proc ASCE 1974;100:111–21. [26] Rackwitz R. Practical probabilistic approach to design. First order reliability concepts for design codes. Bull d’information Du CEB 1976;112. [27] Zhao Y-G, Ono T. A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (FORM/SORM). Struct Saf 1999;21:95–112. [28] Rackwitz R. Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives. Struct Saf 2001;23:365–95. [29] Fiessler B, Neumann H-J, Rackwitz R. Quadratic limit states in structural reliability. J Eng Mech Div 1979;105:661–76. [30] Rosenblatt M. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat 1952;23:470–2. [31] Hosseini P, Hatami N, Hoseini Vaez SR. Reliability-Based Optimum Design of Dome Truss Structures through Enhanced Vibration Particle System. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2023;11:47–67. [32] Vaez SRH, Fathali MA, Samani AA. An approach for optimum performance-based seismic design of 3D steel moment frames. Eng Struct 2024;301:117248. [33] de Melo Ferreira SR, Fucale S, de Oliveira JTR, de Sá WB, de Andrade Moura SF. Evaluation of the friction angle of soil-wall in contact with different materials and surface roughness. Electron J Geotech Eng 2016;21:4655–72. [34] Hosseini P, Kaveh A, Hatami N, Hoseini Vaez SR. The optimization of large-scale dome trusses on the basis of the probability of failure. Int J Optim Civ Eng 2022;12:457–75.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 787 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 80

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Retaining Wall Stability: Investigating the Effect of Construction Defects