پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 691 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,035 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 71,039,508 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 62,489,027 |
Utilizing a hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-Delphi approach for identifying and prioritizing construction cost overruns in project management | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 16، شماره 4، تیر 2025، صفحه 83-92 اصل مقاله (1012.24 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.31645.4692 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Marzangoushi1؛ Alireza Mirjalili* 1؛ Hassan Dehghan Dehnavi2 | ||
| 1Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 مرداد 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 مهر 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Construction projects are frequently associated with a high incidence of cost overruns. To address this issue, the present study adopts a descriptive and survey-based approach to identify and rank the factors that contribute to construction costs. The study's statistical population comprises ten expert specialists, and the fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) with Analytical Network Process (ANP) (DANP) technique is utilized to evaluate the research factors. Additionally, the fuzzy DANP and Delphi methods are employed to rank the essential dimensions and criteria of the research. The study's findings reveal that environmental factors are the primary cause of construction cost overruns, followed by managerial factors and legal and administrative factors, respectively. Dynamic conditions often result in unpredictable challenges for environmental factors, making them a critical driver of construction cost overruns. Therefore, environmental factors play a significant role in contributing to construction cost overruns. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Construction management؛ Fuzzy Delphi؛ Fuzzy DANP؛ Environmental Aspects؛ Ranking | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] F. Afzal, S. Yunfei, M. Nazir, and S.M. Bhatti, A review of artificial intelligence-based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies: Cost overrun in construction projects, Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus. 14 (2019), no. 2, 300–328. [2] B. Akomah, J. Mensah, Z. Mustapha, and S. Kottey, Cost impacts of variations on building construction projects, MedCrave Online J. Civil Engin. 4 (2018), no. 5, 386–392. [3] G.B.S. Alekhya, K. Shashikanth, and M.A. Prasad, Risk assessment of cost overrun using fuzzy logic model, Mater. Today: Proc. 62 (2022), 1803–1810. [4] T. Amri and M. Marey-Perez, Towards a sustainable construction industry: Delays and cost overrun causes in construction projects of Oman, J. Project Manag. 5 (2020), no. 2, 87–102. [5] W.-Y. Chiu, G.-H. Tzeng, and H.-L. Li, A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business, Knowledge-based Syst. 37 (2013), 48–61. [6] I. Gurkhani, M. Mohammadi, and A. Sabet, Identifying the effective factors on the occurrence of delays and cost increases in case study of Mehr Housing projects, 1st Nat. Conf. Manag. Ethics Bus., Shiraz, Iran, 2019. [7] M. Hejazi and R. Norouzpour, The role of project integration management in reducing construction project costs, 7th Nat. Conf. Account. Manag. Appl., Tehran, Iran, 2015. [8] M.S. Islam, M. Nepal, and M. Skitmore, Modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to cost overrun risk assessment of power plant projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 145 (2019), no. 2. [9] M. Juszczyk, The challenges of nonparametric cost estimation of construction works with the use of artificial intelligence tools, Proc. Eng. 196 (2017), 415–442. [10] S. Kanchana and A. Sukumaran, A critical study on cost escalation in construction industry, Int. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Res. 5 (2018), no. 2, 194–197. [11] M. Khalilzadeh and R. Mohammadi, Factors affecting increasing the cost of construction projects in construction projects (Qazvin city), 12th Int. Conf. Project Manag., Tehran, Iran, 2017. [12] A. Lesniak and K. Zima, Cost calculation of construction projects including sustainability factors using the case-based reasoning (CBR) method, J. Sustain. 10 (2018), no. 5, 1–14. [13] A.Q. Memon, A.H. Memon, M. Soomro, and I. Rahman, Common factors affecting time and cost performance of construction projects in Pakistan, Pakistan J. Sci. 71 (2019), no. 4, 64–68. [14] T. Nyoni, Towards factors affecting delays in construction projects: A case of Zimbabwe, Dynamic Res. J. J. Econ. Finance 2 (2017), no. 1, 12–28. [15] J.I. Obianyo, O.E. Okey, and G.U. Alaneme, Assessment of cost overrun factors in construction projects in Nigeria using fuzzy logic, Innov. Infrast. Solut. 7 (2022), no. 5, 1–20. [16] A. Pirasteh, Studying factors affecting the increase in delays and costs of construction projects, 2nd Conf. Civil Engin. Architect. Urban Plann. Islamic World, Tabriz, Iran, 2018. [17] M.A. Ronald and S. Agung, Analysis of project cost management and the effect on cost overrun in construction projects, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7 (2018), no. 7, 8049–8054. [18] A. Sen, A.K. Dwivedi, and M.K. Trivedi, Evaluation of rework factors affecting cost and schedule performance in construction projects, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 5 (2018), no. 8, 489–497. [19] S.K. Seyedebrahimi, A.R. Mirjalili, and A. Sadeghian, Identification and prioritization of factors influencing the increase in construction costs of building investments using factor analysis, Arch. Civil Engin. 67 (2021), no. 3, 705–722. [20] S. Sharma and P.K. Goyal, Fuzzy assessment of the risk factors causing cost overrun in construction industry, Evol. Intell. 15 (2022), 2269–2281. [21] N. Thakur, Cost overrun and time delay risk assessment in local road bridge construction using fuzzy inference system, Doctoral dissertation, Pulchowk Campus, 2021. [22] I. Zafar, I.Y. Wuni, G.Q. Shen, S. Ahmed, and T. Yousaf, A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis of time overrun risk factors in highway projects of terrorism-affected countries: the case of Pakistan, Int. J. Constr. Manag. 22 (2022), no. 4, 732–750. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 809 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 524 |
||