data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12698/126983dd097b4e87784adf8776e70724c5bd246e" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه سمنان"
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 610 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,026 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,082,753 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,656,166 |
Prioritization Comparison of TOPSIS and AHP to IRC: A Case Study of Kurukshetra Roads | ||
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 18 آبان 1403 | ||
نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2024.33664.2032 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Ankit Sharma* 1؛ Praveen Aggarwal2؛ S.N. Sachdeva2، 3 | ||
1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, Haryana-136119, India | ||
2Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, Haryana-136119, India | ||
3Vice Chancellor, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana-136119, India | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 13 فروردین 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 22 تیر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 13 آبان 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
The ever-growing requirements for pavements need regular maintenance. Prioritization of pavement maintenance using the multi-criteria-decision-making (MCDM) method is an established method. This study prioritizes roads in Kurukshetra district, Haryana, India, using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Indian Roads Congress (IRC) standard for prioritization of roads in India is used as a benchmark to compare the ranking provided by both methods. TOPSIS outperformed the two methods, with a Spearman correlation coefficient value of 0.78 and an Index of Agreement value of 0.88. Compared to the IRC method's fixed weight assignment for rank calculation, the TOPSIS method offers a distinct advantage. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
TOPSIS؛ AHP؛ IRC؛ Data-driven prioritization؛ Indian roads | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 96 |