پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 663 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,691 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,988,292 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,481,393 |
Development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) – Based Quality Management System for Concrete Bridges Maintenance Works to Improve Maintenance Performance | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، اردیبهشت 2026 اصل مقاله (556.62 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2025.35701.2194 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Naufal Budi Laksono* 1؛ Fairus Kanza Januar Mashito2؛ Yusuf Latief3؛ Bambang Trigunarsyah4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia | ||
| 2Bachelor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia | ||
| 4Associate Professor, School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Australia | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 02 آبان 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 06 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 25 دی 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The state of bridges in Indonesia is concerning, with only 1.2% of the 18,990 national bridges classified as being in good condition. A significant number of bridge failures stem from inadequate maintenance, highlighting the urgent need for a structured and effective quality management approach. This research develops a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)-based Quality Management System (QMS) framework specifically for concrete bridge maintenance to enhance performance and ensure adherence to national standards. The QMS encompasses three main stages—inspection, maintenance, and rehabilitation—comprising 10 activities systematically aligned with bridge maintenance requirements. Quantitative findings from expert validation showed high suitability of the QMS framework, with average scores of 4.0 to 5.0 across content, format, and performance effectiveness. Statistical analysis with 33 respondents revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.768) between the QMS and key maintenance performance indicators such as structural safety and bridge importance, explaining 54.9% and 59.9% of the variance, respectively. Qualitative insights emphasized the enhanced organization and durability of maintenance processes, supported by 10 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), work instructions, and checklists. This study's novelty lies in integrating WBS into QMS for concrete bridge maintenance, providing a structured methodology for achieving consistent and high-quality outcomes. The implementation of this framework is anticipated to significantly improve the safety, reliability, and sustainability of bridge infrastructure in Indonesia. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Bridge maintenance؛ Work breakdown structure؛ Maintenance performance؛ Maintenance work؛ Quality management system (QMS) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Wang YW, Ni YQ, Wang SM. Structural health monitoring of railway bridges using innovative sensing technologies and machine learning algorithms: A concise review. Intell Transp … 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/iti/liac009/6732506.
[2] Capacci L, Biondini F, Frangopol DM. Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: Review. Resilient Cities Struct 2022;1:23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.05.001.
[3] C. Crawford K. Perspective chapter: Bridge deterioration and failures. In: Ravindran G, Mahesh V, Kassem MM, editors. Fail. Anal. - Struct. Heal. Monit. Struct. Infrastruct. Components, London, England: IntechOpen; 2023.
[4] Banerjee S, Vishwanath BS, Devendiran DK. Multihazard resilience of highway bridges and bridge networks: a review. Struct Infrastruct Eng Maint Manag Life-Cycle Des Perform 2019;15:1694–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1648526.
[5] Ali T. Resilient Infrastructure: Adapting Civil Engineering to Climate Change and Natural Disasters. Lib J Lang Lit Rev 2023.
[6] Oreto C, Biancardo SA, Abbondati F, Veropalumbo R. Leveraging infrastructure BIM for life-cycle-based sustainable road pavement management. Mater 2023;16:1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031047.
[7] Zhao X, Yang H, Yao Y, Qi H, Guo M, Su Y. Factors affecting traffic risks on bridge sections of freeways based on partial dependence plots. Physica A 2022;598:127343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127343.
[8] Tang D, Huang M. The sustainable development of bridges in China: Collapse cause analysis, existing management dilemmas and potential solutions. Buildings 2024;14:419. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020419.
[9] Jumlah Jembatan Nasional 2025.
[10] De Bartolomeo D, Renzi E, Tamasi G, Palermo G, Nucci F Di. The Italian Risk-Based approach for the development of an Integrated Safety Management System for Road Infrastructures and its Relations with innovative guidelines on the risk management of existing bridges. Transp Res Procedia 2023;69:886–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.249.
[11] Puspitasari S, Harahap S, Astuti P. A Critical Review of Bridge Management System in Indonesia, 2022, p. 381–9.
[12] Hari WA, Tiong I. Forensic engineering analysis of building structures in Indonesia: a case study of the collapse of the Mahakam II Kutai Kartanegara bridge in East Borneo. Russ J Agric Socio … 2019.
[13] Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Yeseta M, Meng D, Shao X, Dang Q, et al. Flexural behaviors and capacity prediction on damaged reinforcement concrete (RC) bridge deck strengthened by ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) layer. Constr Build Mater 2019;215:347–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.229.
[14] R I, A W, I M. Development of bridge inspection quality assurance for sustainable bridge management system in Indonesia. Pros KRTJ HPJI 2023;16:1–14. https://doi.org/10.58674/phpji.v16i1.319.
[15] Davila Delgado JM, Butler LJ, Gibbons N, Brilakis I, Elshafie MZEB, Middleton C. Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Bridg Eng 2017;170:204–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.16.00013.
[16] Zanini MA, Faleschini F, Casas JR. State-of-research on performance indicators for bridge quality control and management. Front Built Environ 2019;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00022.
[17] Naghavi-Konjin Z, Mortazavi SB, Mahabadi HA, ... Identification of factors that influence occupational accidents in the petroleum industry: A qualitative approach. Work 2020.
[18] Tambare P, Meshram C, Lee C-C, Ramteke RJ, Imoize AL. Performance measurement system and quality management in data-driven Industry 4.0: A review. Sensors (Basel) 2021;22:224. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010224.
[19] Casas JR, Matos JC. Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level. Risk-based Bridg. Eng., CRC Press; 2019, p. 285–98.
[20] Johnson MB, Bektas BA. Defining Bridge Preservation by Action Type. Transp Res Rec 2013;2360:21–6. https://doi.org/10.3141/2360-03.
[21] Aryanto D, Riantini L, Machfudiyanto RA, Latief Y. Identification Risk Potential Hazard of Railway Project Based on the Work Breakdown Structure to Improve Safety Performance, 2022, p. 641–50.
[22] Machfudiyanto RA, Kim S, Latief Y, Rachmawati TSN, Laksono NB. Analysis of design-for-safety implementation factors in the Indonesian construction industry: A two-staged SEM-artificial neural network approach. Heliyon 2023;9:e21273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21273.
[23] Akram MN, Latief Y, Nugroho DB. Development of the Construction Safety Goals and Programs During the Design and Construction Phase for the Audit Process to Improve Construction Safety Performance. Int J Eng Trends Technol 2024;72:71–80. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I1P108.
[24] Ikarwitaza PA, Riantini LS, Latief Y. Development of dictionary and checklist based on WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) of structure works in stadium construction for safety planning. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;794:012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012045.
[25] Li Q-F, Zhang P, Fu Y-C. Risk identification for the construction phases of the large bridge based on WBS-RBS. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 2013;6:1523–30. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.3863.
[26] Strauss A, Mandić Ivanković A, Matos JC, Casas JR, Bourke J, Roper S, et al. Defining a Digital Strategy in a BIM Environment to Manage Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges in the Context of Italian Regulation. Autom … 2022;15:1217–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174583.
[27] Antony J, Sony M, McDermott O, Jayaraman R, Flynn D. An exploration of organizational readiness factors for Quality 4.0: an intercontinental study and future research directions. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 2023;40:582–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-10-2021-0357.
[28] Hoyle D. ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook-updated for the ISO 9001: 2015 standard: Increasing the Quality of an Organization’s Outputs. taylorfrancis.com; 2017.
[29] Beyene KG, Nadew S, Ali WG, Gebrehiwot AG, Atsibeha SG. How to write standard operating procedures: values and a practical guide. Int J Drug Regul Aff 2022;10:32–7. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijdra.v10i4.557.
[30] Hubbard DG, Bolles DL, PMP P. PMO Framework and PMO Models for Project Business Management. PM World J 2015.
[31] Giacumo LA, Breman J. Trends and implications of models, frameworks, and approaches used by instructional designers in workplace learning and performance improvement. Perform Improv Q 2021;34:131–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21349.
[32] Eniola AA, Olorunleke GK, Akintimehin OO, Ojeka JD, Oyetunji B. The impact of organizational culture on total quality management in SMEs in Nigeria. Heliyon 2019;5:e02293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02293.
[33] Strauss A, Vidovic A, Zambon I, Dengg F, Tanasic N, ... Performance indicators for roadway bridges. repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt; 2016.
[34] Mandić Ivanković A, Skokandić D, Kušter Marić M, Srbić M. Performance-based ranking of existing road bridges. Appl Sci 2021;11:4398. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104398.
[35] Poli F, Bado MF, Verzobio A, Zonta D. Bridge structural safety assessment: a novel solution to uncertainty in the inspection practice. Struct Infrastruct Eng Maint Manag Life-Cycle Des Perform 2023:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2211956.
[36] Zhou J, Caprani CC, Zhang L. On the structural safety of long-span bridges under traffic loadings caused by maintenance works. Eng Struct 2021;240:112407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112407.
[37] Nader M, Choi C, Vo N, Sanjines A. Maintenance plan and durability design for the new Samuel De Champlain Bridge. Bridg. Safety, Maintenance, Manag. Life-Cycle, Resil. Sustain., London: CRC Press; 2022, p. 1931–8.
[38] Osmolska MJ, Kanstad T, Hendriks MAN, Hornbostel K, Markeset G. Durability of pretensioned concrete girders in coastal climate bridges: Basis for better maintenance and future design. Struct Concr 2019;20:2256–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900144.
[39] Harywijaya W, Afifuddin M, Isya M. PENILAIAN KONDISI JEMBATAN MENGGUNAKAN BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS) DAN BRIDGE CONDITION RATING (BCR). J Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perenc 2020;3:80–8. https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v3i1.16462.
[40] Juliastuti, Setyandito O, Suangga M, Sulistyono D. The river flow regime assessment model of bridge condition rating for preventive maintenance program. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018;195:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/195/1/012019.
[41] Nichols CR, Wright LD, Bainbridge SJ, Cosby A, Hénaff A, Loftis JD, et al. Collaborative science to enhance coastal resilience and adaptation. Front Mar Sci 2019;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00404.
[42] Malarich K, Leckrone T, Thompson PD, Gager K, Alampalli S. Integration of AASHTO element data into the New York State Department of Transportation bridge management system: Treatments and project selection. Transp Res Rec 2022;2676:279–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221086618.
[43] Dronova I. Environmental heterogeneity as a bridge between ecosystem service and visual quality objectives in management, planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan 2017;163:90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.005. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 489 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 444 |
||