پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 687 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,985 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 70,959,618 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 62,423,674 |
Impact of GGBFS and Pond Ash on the Strength and Durability of Concrete Mixes | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، اردیبهشت 2026 اصل مقاله (740.81 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2025.35267.2165 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Agrawal Sangeeta* 1؛ Shirule Pravin2؛ Husain Mujahid3؛ Pawar Sudhakar3 | ||
| 1Research Scholar, SSBT’s College of Engineering & Technology, Bambhori, Jalgaon, MS, India | ||
| 2Professor & Head, Department of Civil Engineering, SSBT’s College of Engineering & Technology, Bambhori, Jalgaon, MS, India | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, SSBT’s College of Engineering & Technology, Bambhori, Jalgaon, MS, India | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 26 مهر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 دی 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study investigates the sustainability and performance of M20 and M30 grade concrete incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Pond Ash as partial replacements for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and fine aggregates, respectively. Replacement levels were varied between 10% and 50%, and their effects on workability, strength, and durability were analyzed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Concrete mixes with up to 40% replacement demonstrated enhanced workability (R² = 99.96%, MAPE = 0.85%), attributed to improved particle packing and reduced internal friction. However, beyond this threshold, workability declined due to increased porosity and water absorption. Compressive strength (CS), flexural strength (FS), and split tensile strength (SPT) showed a diminishing trend with higher replacement levels. Model for compressive strength achieved an R² of 97.21% and MAPE of 3.21%, while flexural strength model had an R² of 99.68% and MAPE of 1.13%, indicating high predictive accuracy. Durability assessments revealed a decline in water absorption ( R² = 88.05%, MAPE = 5.45%) and acid attack resistance (R² = 99.83%, MAPE = 0.58%) with increasing GGBFS and Pond Ash content, primarily due to increased porosity and altered microstructural characteristics. Microstructural analysis confirmed reduced hydration density and weaker bond formation at higher replacement levels. Economically and environmentally, the use of GGBFS and Pond Ash reduces carbon emissions and reliance on natural resources, providing cost-effective and sustainable alternatives for concrete production. The findings highlight that optimal replacement levels (up to 40%) achieve a balance between sustainability and mechanical performance, contributing to sustainable development in construction. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS)؛ Pond ash؛ Sustainable concrete؛ Optimization؛ Mechanical properties؛ Durability | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Maheswaran J, Chellapandian M, Arunachelam N, Hari MNT. Thermal and durability characteristics of optimized green concrete developed using slag powder and pond ash. Mater Res Express 2023;10:100284. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/acf7b3.
[2] Kumar A, Arora H, Kapoor N, Kontoni D-P, Kumar K, Jahangir H, et al. Practical applicable model for estimating the carbonation depth in fly-ash based concrete structures by utilizing adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Comput Concr 2023;32:119–38. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2023.32.2.119.
[3] Agnihotri A, Ramana P V. GGBS: Fly-Ash evaluation and mechanical properties within high strength concrete. Mater Today Proc 2022;50:2404–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.257.
[4] Patrisia Y, Gunasekara C, Law DW, Loh T, Nguyen KTQ, Setunge S. Optimizing engineering potential in sustainable structural concrete brick utilizing pond ash and unwashed recycled glass sand integration. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;21:e03816.
[5] Lal D, Chatterjee A, Dwivedi A. Investigation of properties of cement mortar incorporating pond ash – An environmental sustainable material. Constr Build Mater 2019;209:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.049.
[6] Onyelowe KC, Kontoni D-PN, Ebid AM, Dabbaghi F, Soleymani A, Jahangir H, et al. Multi-objective optimization of sustainable concrete containing fly ash based on environmental and mechanical considerations. Buildings 2022;12:948.
[7] Fasil S, Periyasamy L, Seethapathi M, Das KM. Enhancing Sustainable Concrete Investigating the Feasibility of POND ASH as a Partial Replacement for Fine Aggregate in GGBS-Based. Mater Sci Res India 2024;20:176–94. https://doi.org/10.13005/msri/200305.
[8] Soni A, Nateriya R. Investigation properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating pond ash. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2024;31.
[9] Rajak TK, Yadu L, Chouksey SK. Effect of fly ash on geotechnical properties and stability of coal mine overburden dump: an overview. SN Appl Sci 2020;2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2803-3.
[10] Patil H, Dwivedi A. Prediction of properties of the cement incorporated with nanoparticles by principal component analysis (PCA) and response surface regression (RSR). Mater Today Proc 2021;43:1358–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.170.
[11] Patil HS, Dwivedi AK. Rheology of self-compacting concrete nanocomposites. Int J Recent Technol Eng 2019;8:554–7. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1603.078219.
[12] Patil H, Dwivedi A. Impact of nano ZnO particles on the characteristics of the cement mortar. Innov Infrastruct Solut 2021;6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00588-9.
[13] Onyelowe KC, Ebid AM, Mahdi HA, Soleymani A, Jahangir H, Dabbaghi F. Optimization of green concrete containing fly ash and rice husk ash based on hydro-mechanical properties and life cycle assessment considerations. Civ Eng J 2022;8:3912–38.
[14] Patil MN, Dubey SD, Patil HS. Self-curing concrete: a state-of-the-art review. Innov Infrastruct Solut 2023;8:313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01282-8.
[15] Patil M, Dubey S, Patil H. Optimized properties of concrete at various exposure conditions. Res Eng Struct Mater 2023. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2022.577ma1107.
[16] Onyelowe KC, Kontoni D-PN, Oyewole S, Apugo-Nwosu T, Nasrollahpour S, Soleymani A, et al. Compressive strength optimization and life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques. E3S Web Conf 2023;436:8009.
[17] Mandal R, Panda SK, Nayak S, Chakraborty S. Efficacy of pond ash (PA) combined with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) in producing cement-less mortar. Structures 2022;45:748–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.060.
[18] Ahmad Karolos J.; Majdi Ali; Naqash Muhammad Tayyab; Deifalla Ahmed Farouk; Ben Kahla Nabil; Isleem Haytham F.; Qaidi Shaker M. A. JK. A Comprehensive Review on the Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) in Concrete Production. Sustainability 2022;14:8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148783.
[19] Nayak DK, Abhilash PP, Singh R, Kumar R, Kumar V. Fly ash for sustainable construction: A review of fly ash concrete and its beneficial use case studies. Clean Mater 2022;6:100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100143.
[20] Li G, Zhao X. Properties of concrete incorporating fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cem Concr Compos 2003;25:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00058-6.
[21] Nisbet M, Vangeem M, Gajda J, Marceau M. Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete 2007.
[22] Oviedo AI, Londoño JM, Vargas JF, Zuluaga C, Gómez A. Modeling and Optimization of Concrete Mixtures Using Machine Learning Estimators and Genetic Algorithms. Modelling 2024;5:642–58. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling5030034.
[23] Mehta A, Siddique R. Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Rice Husk Ash: Strength and Permeability Properties. J Clean Prod 2018;205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.313.
[24] Cook R, Lapeyre J, Ma H, Kumar A. Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete: Critical Comparison of Performance of a Hybrid Machine Learning Model with Standalone Models. J Mater Civ Eng 2019;31:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002902.
[25] Barkoula N, Ioannou C, Aggelis DG, Matikas TE. Optimization of nano-silica ’ s addition in cement mortars and assessment of the failure process using acoustic emission monitoring. Constr Build Mater 2016;125:546–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.055.
[26] Tripathi D, Rakesh K, Mehta PK, Singh A. A sustainable concrete with manufactured sand in different aggressive environments. Springer Nature—Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Recent Adv Struct Technol 2021;135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6389-2_1.
[27] Vidyadhara V, Ranganath RV. Upcycling of pond ash in cement-based and geopolymer-based composite: A review. Constr Build Mater 2023;379:130949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130949.
[28] Alexandra C, Bogdan H, Camelia N, Zoltan K. Mix design of self-compacting concrete with limestone filler versus fly ash addition. Procedia Manuf 2018;22:301–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.046.
[29] Adesina A. Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environ Challenges 2020;1:100004-NA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2020.100004.
[30] Koppoju M, Mudimby A, Abhinay A. Fracture parameters of flyash and GGBS based Alkali activated concrete. Mater Today Proc 2022;65:2053–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.246.
[31] Phanikumar BR, Sofi A. Effect of pond ash and steel fibre on engineering properties of concrete. Ain Shams Eng J 2016;7:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.03.009.
[32] Rajak TK, Yadu L, Chouksey SK. Strength Characteristics and Stability Analysis of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) Stabilized Coal Mine Overburden-Pond Ash Mix. Geotech Geol Eng 2020;38:663–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01056-z.
[33] Kanamarlapudi L, Jonalagadda KB, Jagarapu DCK, Eluru A. Different mineral admixtures in concrete: a review. SN Appl Sci 2020;2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2533-6.
[34] IS:12089-1987. Specification for granulated slag for the manufacture of Portland slag cement. 1987.
[35] IS 3812: Part 1 (2013) specification. Pulverized Fuel Ash - Specification: Part 1 For Use as Pozzolana in Cement, Cement Mortar and Concrete. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi, India 2013:1–12.
[36] IS: 12269-1987 (Reaffirmed 1999). Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. 1999.
[37] Indian Standard. IS 383 : 2016 Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete - Specification. Bur. Indian Stand. New Delhi, 2016.
[38] Indian Standard. IS:456 (2000) Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice. Bur. Indian Stand. New Delhi, 2000.
[39] Indian Standard. IS 10262: 2019 Concrete Mix Proportioning- Guidelines. Bur. Indian Stand., vol. Second Rev, 2019, p. 1–40.
[40] Indian Standard. IS 516 (1959) Indian Standard methods of test for Strength of Concrete. Bur. Indian Stand. New Delhi, 1959.
[41] Indian Standard. IS 1199-1959: Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand. Dehli, 1959.
[42] Indian Standard. IS 5816:1999 Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete Method of Test. Bur. Indian Stand. New Delhi, 1999.
[43] Majhi RK, Nayak AN, Mukharjee BB. Development of sustainable concrete using recycled coarse aggregate and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 2018;159:417–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.118.
[44] Ge W, Wang A, Zhang Z, Ge Y, Chen Y, Li W, et al. Study on the workability, mechanical property and water absorption of reactive powder concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 2023;18:e01777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01777.
[45] Velumani SK, Venkatraman S. Assessing the Impact of Fly Ash and Recycled Concrete Aggregates on Fibre-Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete Strength and Durability. Processes 2024;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081602.
[46] Sultana I, Islam GMS. Potential of ladle furnace slag as supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 2023;18:e02141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02141.
[47] Yaseen N, Alcivar-Bastidas S, Irfan-ul-Hassan M, Petroche DM, Qazi AU, Ramirez AD. Concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials: Temporal evolution of compressive strength and environmental life cycle assessment. Heliyon 2024;10:e25056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25056.
[48] Vishavkarma A, Kumar M, Harish KV. Influence of combined substitution of slag and fly ash in improving the pore structure and corrosion resistance of foam concrete mixtures used for reinforced concrete applications. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024;21:e03449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03449.
[49] Fode TA, Chande Jande YA, Kivevele T. Effects of different supplementary cementitious materials on durability and mechanical properties of cement composite – Comprehensive review. Heliyon 2023;9:e17924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17924.
[50] Naseri Nasab M, Jahangir H, Hasani H, Majidi M-H, Khorashadizadeh S. Estimating the punching shear capacities of concrete slabs reinforced by steel and FRP rebars with ANN-Based GUI toolbox. Structures 2023;50:1204–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.072.
[51] Qaidi Ahmed S.; Ahmed Hemn Unis; Faraj Rabar H.; Emad Wael; Tayeh Bassam A.; Althoey Fadi; Zaid Osama; Sor Nadhim Hamah SMA. M. Rubberized geopolymer composites: A comprehensive review. Ceram Int 2022;48:24234–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.123.
[52] Alzaza A, Ohenoja K, Illikainen M. Improved strength development and frost resistance of Portland cement ground-granulated blast furnace slag binary binder cured at 0 °C with the addition of calcium silicate hydrate seeds. J Build Eng 2022;48:103904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103904.
[53] Mohammadi A, Ramezanianpour AM. Investigating the environmental and economic impacts of using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) using the life cycle approach. J Build Eng 2023;79:107934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107934.
[54] Nilimaa J. Smart materials and technologies for sustainable concrete construction. Dev Built Environ 2023;15:100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100177. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 595 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 571 |
||