دانشگاه سمنان

 آمار

تعداد نشریات21
تعداد شماره‌ها610
تعداد مقالات9,028
تعداد مشاهده مقاله67,082,847
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,656,343
Rezaee, Maryam, Allahyari, Alireza. (1402). The Advantages and Limitations of AI-Powered Writing Assistants in the EFL Classroom: Recent Insights and Future Directions. نشریه هنرهای کاربردی, 3(3), 61-68. doi: 10.22075/mseee.2025.32194.1131
Maryam Rezaee; Alireza Allahyari. "The Advantages and Limitations of AI-Powered Writing Assistants in the EFL Classroom: Recent Insights and Future Directions". نشریه هنرهای کاربردی, 3, 3, 1402, 61-68. doi: 10.22075/mseee.2025.32194.1131
Rezaee, Maryam, Allahyari, Alireza. (1402). 'The Advantages and Limitations of AI-Powered Writing Assistants in the EFL Classroom: Recent Insights and Future Directions', نشریه هنرهای کاربردی, 3(3), pp. 61-68. doi: 10.22075/mseee.2025.32194.1131
Rezaee, Maryam, Allahyari, Alireza. The Advantages and Limitations of AI-Powered Writing Assistants in the EFL Classroom: Recent Insights and Future Directions. نشریه هنرهای کاربردی, 1402; 3(3): 61-68. doi: 10.22075/mseee.2025.32194.1131

The Advantages and Limitations of AI-Powered Writing Assistants in the EFL Classroom: Recent Insights and Future Directions

Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering
دوره 3، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 13، بهمن 2023، صفحه 61-68    اصل مقاله (271.71 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/mseee.2025.32194.1131
نویسندگان
Maryam Rezaee؛ Alireza Allahyari*
Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
تاریخ دریافت: 09 آبان 1402،  تاریخ بازنگری: 06 مهر 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 10 بهمن 1403 
چکیده
In this digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies play a significant role in English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching and learning. One area that has received increasing attention is AI-powered writing assistants, in which AI-based tools are developed to assist EFL learners in improving their English writing output. This paper provides an overview of the advantages, and limitations of AI technologies applied to some popular writing assistants for English writing purposes. The overview indicates that there is still a critical gap between what AI educational technologies could do and how they are implemented in the EFL context. Therefore, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaborative research is essential to overcome the limitations of current AI-powered writing assistants. This overview would serve as a good reference for guiding technology experts to develop more sophisticated intelligent writing assistants that adapt to EFL learners’ diverse needs and preferences. The paper also provides rich discussions on future research directions from multiple perspectives.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Artificial Intelligence؛ Writing Assistant؛ English Writing؛ English as a Foreign Language
مراجع
  • Faller, J. M. V., “Grammarly investigation into EFL writing issues involving Omani learners”, International Journal of Language and Linguistics,5(3), (2018). https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v5n316
  • Nobles S, Paganucci L., “Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments”, Computers and Composition 38 (1), 16–31, (2015).
  • Singh, J. P.: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): creating norms for a complex world. Routledge (2010).
  • Alharbi, W., “AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools, Education Research International, (1), (2023).
  • Yamin M., “Learning from students’ experiences in writing paragraph”, Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 188-202, (2019).
  • Fairbairn, G., & Winch, C., Reading, Writing, and Reasoning: a guide for students, McGraw-Hill Education (UK), (2011).
  • Hasanah, Y.A., “Using picture sequences to improve student’s ability in writing narrative texts”, Doctoral Dissertation., Universitas Negeri Malang, (2008).
  • Masduqi, H. “Critical thinking skills and meaning in English language teaching”, Teflin Journal, 22(2), 185-200, (2011).
  • Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T., “Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching: A CALL for intelligent practice”, (2022).
  • Seufert, S., Guggemos,J., & Tarantini,E., "Digitale Transformation in Schulen. Kompetenzanforderungen an Lehrpersonen”, Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen-und Lehrerbildung: Zeitschrift zu Theorie und Praxis der Aus-und Weiterbildung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern , 36 (2) ,175-193, (2018).
  • Marzuki, Widiati,U., Rusdin,D., Darwin ,& Indrawati ,I.,“The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective”, Cogent Education, 10(2),(2023).
  • Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R., “Post-graduate students’ perceptions of Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class”. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437–451, (2022).
  • Wang, Z. ,“Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course”, Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80–97, (2022).
  • Zhao, X. ,“Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers”, RELC Journal, (2022).
  • Tambunan, A. R. S., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. ,“Investigating EFL students’ linguistic problems using grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback”, Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16–27, (2022).
  • Lam, R., & Moorhouse, B. L. ,“Using digital portfolios to develop students’ writing: A practical guide for language teachers”. Taylor & Francis, (2022).
  • Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S., “Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, (2022).
  • Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. ,“Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile l2 writing”, jalt call Journal, 17(2), 74-92, (2021).
  • Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. , “Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial”. Heliyon, 7(5), (2021).
  • Lu, X. , “Natural language processing and Intelligent ComputerAssisted Language Learning (ICALL) ” ,The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–6. (2018).
  • AlFarsi, G., Tawafak, R. M., ElDow, A., Malik, S. I., Jabbar, J., & Al Sideiri, A., “Smart classroom technology in artificial intelligence: A review paper”. In International Conference on Culture Heritage, Education, Sustainable Tourism, and Innovation Technologies, 229–235, (2021).
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Lee, H. (2020). Intelligent assistants in language learning: analysis of features and limitations. CALL for widening participation: short papers from EUROCALL 2020, 1(1), 172-176.
  • Baker, T., & Smith, L., “Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges”, Nesta,      (2019),                Retrieved from        Nesta       Foundation               website: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
  • Perdana, I., & Farida, M., "Online grammar checkers and their use for EFL writing ", Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures, 2 (2), 67-76, (2019).
  • Dale R. and Viethen J., “The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021, Natural Language Engineering”. 27(4), 511–518, (2021).
  • Perdana, I., & Farida, M., "Online grammar checkers and their use for EFL writing ", Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures, 2 (2), 67-76, (2019).
  • Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M., “Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation”, The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(6), 1-44, (2010).
  • Sommers, N., “Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers”, College composition and communication, 31(4), 378-388, (1980).
  • Barrot, J.S., “Integrating technology   into   ESL/EFL   writing   through   grammarly”, RELC   Journal, 0033688220966632, (2020).
  • Fitria, T.N., “Quillbot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing”,Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1),183–196, (2021).
  • Kinga S, Gupta GS., “Platforms as Foundation of Sharing Economy”. Delhi Business Review,22(1),1-13, (2021).
  • Fitria TN. ,“Avoiding Plagiarism of Students’ Scientific Writing by Using the QuillBot Paraphraser. Elsya ” , Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), (2022).
  • Razack HIA, Mathew ST, Saad FFA, Alqahtani SA., “Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world”, Science Editing,8(2),134-144, (2021).
  • Pongpuehee S, Prachanant N, Ruangpaisan S., “ Essay Writing Challenges encountered by Thai Students in EFL Context”. Editorial Board, 132,(2022).
  • Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J., “Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002, (2020).
  • Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., C´aceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., “Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature”, Education Sciences, 9(1), 51, (2019).
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F., “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators?”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1),1-27, (2019).
  • Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J., “Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019)”, Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19, (2021).
  • Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H., “AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100017, (2021).
  • Boud, D. & Soler, R., “Sustainable assessment revisited”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400-413, (2016).
  • McMillan, J.H., & Hearn, J., “Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher Achievement”, Educational Horizons, 87(1),40-49, (2008).
  • Blume, C., Schmidt, T., & Schmidt, I., "An imperfect union? Enacting an analytic and evaluative framework for digital games for language learning" Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung: ZFF, 28 (2), 209-231, (2017).
  • Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mari˜no, O., & Wheeler, S., “Can artificial intelligence transform higher education?”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-12, (2020).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 15


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب