پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 704 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,142 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 71,443,332 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 63,167,843 |
Investigating the relationship between thinking style functions and auditor objectivity (Case study: Audit institutions) | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 16، شماره 12، اسفند 2025، صفحه 135-145 اصل مقاله (696.12 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.32931.4897 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdolnaser Belazh1؛ Hoshang Amiri* 2؛ Mohammad Hamed Khanmohammadi3؛ Mohamad Khodamoradi4 | ||
| 1Department of Accounting, Khorramshahr-Persian Gulf International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramshahr, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Accounting, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Mathematics, Izeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Izeh, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 18 آذر 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 05 اسفند 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Research shows that personal and situational conditions influence people's judgments and decisions. People decide the presence of others, which may be different from their decision alone. Relationships between individual characteristics and the environment governing people create a unique situation for people at every moment that cannot be repeated. Therefore, it is possible to examine the auditor's objectivity by knowing the characteristics of people, including thinking styles. Therefore, based on this argument, the present study examines the relationship between the functions of thinking styles and the auditor's objectivity. The statistical population studied in this research includes all audit employees working in audit institutions, members of the official accountants of Iran, and audit organizations in 2022. This questionnaire used Svanberg and Öhman's questionnaire \cite{20} and the variable of thinking styles from Sternberg's research questionnaire \cite{19}, including 5 items (legislative thinking, internal thinking, external thinking, liberal thinking, and conservative thinking) to measure the auditor's objectivity. SmartPLS third version software was used for data analysis. The results showed that according to the obtained path coefficients, there is a positive relationship between the auditor's thinking styles and the auditor's objectivity because the value obtained was more significant than 1.96, which indicates the existence of a significant positive relationship between the auditor's thinking styles and the auditor's objectivity. Based on this, the first to fifth research hypotheses are accepted. Finally, based on the results, suggestions were made. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Thinking Style؛ Audit Objectivity؛ Legislative Thinking؛ Internal Thinking؛ External Thinking؛ Liberal Thinking؛ And Conservative Thinking | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] A. Abdi, A study on the relationship of thinking styles of students and their critical thinking skills, Proc.-Soc. Beha. Sci. 47 (2012), 1719–1723. [2] M. Adili, A. Khodamipour, and O. Pourheidari, Investigation the effect of audit firm’s ethical culture and auditors personality types on auditor objectivity, Account. Audit Res. 12 (2020), no. 46, 5–20. [3] B. Akanji, C. Mordi, A. Ituma, T.A. Adisa, and H. Ajonbadi, The influence of organisational culture on leadership style in higher education institutions, Person. Rev. 49 (2020), no. 3, 709–732. [4] S. Armstrong and S. Cools, Cognitive styles and their relevance for business and management, L.F. Zhang and R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Perspective on the nature of intellectual Styles, New York, Springer, 2009. [5] J. Bakhtiari, Z. Poorzamani, and R.A. Royaee, Guanxi and auditor’s independence: social connections theory test, Account. Knowledge Manag. Audit 8 (2019), no. 30, 27–40. [6] C. Fornell and D.F. Larcker, Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, J. Market. Res. 18 (1981), no. 3, 382–388. [7] H. Garavand, H. Pakmehr, and S. Hamedinasab, The causal relationship of conceiving parenting styles and religious orientation with the mediation of the functions of girl students’ thinking styles, Islamic J. Women Family 10 (2022), no. 3, 44–56. [8] B.T. Hasan, P. Chand and M. Lu, Influence of auditor’s gender, experience, rule observance attitudes and critical thinking disposition on materiality judgements, Int. J. Audit. 25 (2021), no. 1, 188–205. [9] A. Lindridge, L. Pe˜naloza, and O. Worlu, Agency and empowerment in consumption in relation to a patriarchal bargain: The case of Nigerian immigrant women in the UK, Eur. J. Market. 50 (2016), no. 9/10, 1652–1671. [10] K. Mahdavian Rad, A. Zabihi, and K. Faghani Makarani, Thinking style and Attributional Style of independent auditors and its relationship with decision making style, Behav. Stud. Manag. 12 (2021), no. 26, 87–103. [11] A.R. Mansoorabady, J. Moradi, A. Salehi, and H. Amiri, Investigating the effect of philosophical mindset di[1]mensions on the relationship between auditing team norms and auditor objectivity, J. Manag. Account. Audit. Knowledge 13 (2024), no. 50, 73–86. [12] T.G. Manyak and I. Wasswa Katono, Conflict management style in Uganda: a gender perspective, Gender Manag. 25 (2010), no. 6, 509–521. [13] T.W. Moore, J.B. Snider, and M. Luchini, Thinking style and emotional intelligence: An empirical investigation, J. Behav. Stud. Bus. 5 (2012), 1. [14] F. Naderi and S.A. Safavi, The relationship between thinking styles and action flexibility with mental health disorders of injured women in Ahvaz city, New Find. Psycho. 5 (2010), no. 16, 113–128. [15] R. Nematikoshteli, The effect of learning styles on the auditor’s performance with the approach of mediator skills multidimensional model, Account. Knowledge J. 13 (2022), no. 4, 143–160. [16] S. Polizzi and E. Scannella, Continuous auditing in public sector and central banks: a framework to tackle imple[1]mentation challenges, J. Financ. Regul. Compl. 31 (2023), no. 1, 40–59. [17] N. Rezaei, Z. Dianati Deilami, R. Gholami Jamkarani, and F. Rahnamay Roodposhty, Examining the effect of auditor’s thinking styles on ability of the detection of assets misappropriation, considering mediating effect of professional skepticism, J. Value Behav. Account. 8 (2023), no. 14, 171–220. [18] M. Siahaan, H. Suharman, T. Fitrijanti, and H. Umar, When internal organizational factors improve detecting corruption in state-owned companies, J. Financ. Crime 31 (2024), no. 2, 376–407. [19] R.J. Sternberg, Mental self-government: a theory of intellectual styles and their development, Human Dev. 31 (1988), no. 4, 197–224. [20] J. Svanberg and P. Ohman, Does charismatic client leadership constrain auditor objectivity?, Behav. Res. Account. 29 (2017), no. 1, 103–118. [21] A.M. Taheri and M. Shaabani, Relationship between thinking style and managers’ entrepreneurship and organizational health, New Approach. Educ. Admin. 8 (2017), no. 3, 309–326. [22] F. Takeda, Employing string similarity metrics of partners to estimate audit team continuity: determinant and its effects on audit outcomes and pricing, J. Account. Liter. 45 (2023), no. 2, 314–339. [23] M. Tenenhaus, J. Pages, L. Ambroisine, and C. Guinot, PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics, Food Qual. Prefer. 16 (2005), no. 4, 315–325. [24] M. Wetzels, G. Odekerken-Schroder, and C. Van Oppen, Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quart. 33 (2009), no.1, 177–195. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,389 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 612 |
||