پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 643 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,418 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,154,649 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 42,197,928 |
تأثیر مقدار سیمان و زمان عملآوری بر مقاومت فشاری محدود نشده و ضریب ارتجاعی خاک | ||
| مهندسی زیر ساخت های حمل و نقل | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 11، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، فروردین 1404، صفحه 59-82 اصل مقاله (2.78 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jtie.2025.35698.1706 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمود نیکخواه شهمیرزادی* 1؛ علیرضا خلج2؛ آرزو طحان3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه شیمی، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 23 آذر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 فروردین 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 فروردین 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ساخت ساختمانها و سایر سازههای مهندسی روی خاک ضعیف یا نرم، بسیار مخاطرهآمیز است زیرا چنین خاکی به دلیل مقاومت برشی کم و تراکمپذیری زیاد، مستعد نشستهای متفاوت است. بهبود برخی از خواص خاک مانند ظرفیت باربری و ویژگیهای مقاومت برشی خاک را میتوان با یکی از روشهای بهسازی، یعنی تثبیت، انجام داد. در این مقاله، تأثیر سیمان بر خصوصیات خاک واقع در منطقه جنوب شرقی سمنان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی اثر سیمان بر مقاومت فشاری خاک ماسهای رسدار به همراه لای است. آزمایشهای مورد استفاده در این تحقیق شامل تراکم و مقاومت فشاری محدود نشده بود. نمونههای آزمایشگاهی به روش تراکم استاتیک تهیه شدند. نمونهها در 95 درصد جرم مخصوص خشک بیشینه به‌منظور رسیدن به بهترین تراکم و با درصدهای مختلف سیمان (2، 4، 6، 8 و10) ساخته شدند. با ازدیاد سیمان از 2 تا 8 درصد، مقاومت فشاری محدود نشده خاک سیمان افزایش یافته و افزودن بیشتر سیمان باعث کاهش مقاومت فشاری محدود نشده گردید. با ازدیاد مقدار سیمان از 2 تا 8 درصد، مقدار ضریب ارتجاعی با شیب ملایمی افزایش یافته ولی ازدیاد بیشتر سیمان تا 10 درصد، روند تغییرات به شدت افزایشی بود. ازدیاد سیمان باعث افزایش وزن مخصوص خشک بیشینه شد. با افزودن سیمان به خاک، مقاومت آن افزایش یافت؛ این افزایش مقاومت تابعی از درصد سیمان بهکار رفته و زمان عملآوری است. نتایج بهدست آمده از ضریب ارتجاعی خاک، حاکی از افزایش شکنندگی خاک اختلاط یافته با سیمان است که با افزایش درصد سیمان بهکار رفته و یا زمان عملآوری، این شکنندگی بیشتر شد. افزودن سیمان، گسیختگی نمونهها را از نرم به شکننده تغییر داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سیمان؛ تراکم؛ مقاومت فشاری محدود نشده؛ تنش-کرنش؛ سمنان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Cement Content and Curing Time on Unconfined Compressive Strength and Soil Elasticity Coefficient | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahmoud Nikkhah Shahmirzadi1؛ Alireza Khalaj2؛ Arezoo Tahan3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, I. R. Iran. | ||
| 2Graduated MSc., Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, I. R. Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, I. R. Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Building the buildings and other engineering structures on weak or soft soil is very risky because such soil is prone to different settlements due to its low shear resistance and high compreessibility. Improving some soil properties such as bearing capacity and shear resistance characteristics can be done by one of the methods of improvement, which is stabilization. In this article, the effect of cement on soil properties in the southeast region of Semnan was investigated. The main objective of this research is to investigate the effect of cement on the compressive strength of sandy clay with silty soil. The tests used in this research included compaction and unconfined compressive strength. Laboratory samples were prepared by static compaction method. The samples were made in 95% of the maximum dry unit mass in order to achieve the best density and with different percentages of cement (2, 4, 6, 8, 10). With increasing the cement from 2% to 8%, the unconfined compressive strength of the cement soil increases and adding more cement causes the unconfined compressive strength to decrease. With increasing the amount of cement from 2% to 8%, the elasticity coefficient increased with a low slope, but with the increase of cement up to 10%, the trend of changes was strongly increasing. Adding cement increases the maximum dry unit weight. By adding cement to the soil, its resistance increases; This increase in strength is a function of the percentage of cement used and the curing time. The results obtained from the soil elasticity coefficient indicate an increase in the brittleness of the soil mixed with cement, which increases with the increase in the percentage of cement used or the curing time. Adding cement changes the fracture of the samples from soft to brittle. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cement, Compaction, Unconfined compressive strength, Stress-strain | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amini, Y. and Hamidi, A. 2014. “Triaxial shear behavior of a cement-treated sand–gravel mixture”. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 6(5): 455-465.
ASTM D75. 2019. “Standard practice for sampling aggregates”.
ASTM D558. 2019. “Standard test methods for moisture-density (unit weight) relations of soil-cement mixtures”.
ASTM D1556. 2024. “Standard test method for density and unit weight of soil in place by sand-cone method”.
ASTM D1557. 2021. “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort”.
ASTM D1632. 2017. “Standard practice for making and curing soil-cement compression and flexure test specimens in the laboratory”.
ASTM D1633. 2017. “Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil-cement cylinders”.
ASTM D2166. 2024. “Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil”.
ASTM D2216. 2019. “Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass”.
ASTM D2487. 2017. “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system)”.
ASTM D6913. 2017. “Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis”.
ASTM D7928. 2021. “Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis”.
ASTM C150. 2024. “Standard specification for portland cement”.
Bahmani, S. H., Farzadnia, N., Asadi, A. and Huat, B. B. K. 2016. “The effect of size and replacement content of nanosilica on strength development of cement treated residual soil”. Constr. Build. Mater., 118: 294-306.
Babalar, M., Raeisi Estabragh, A., Beitollahpoor, I. and Soltani, A. 2016. “Regression model for predicting the compressive strength of treated soil-cement with resin”. Iran. J. Soil Water Res., 47(1): 197-204. [In Persian]
Baldovino, J. D. J. A., Moreira, E. B., Carazzai, É., Rocha, E. V. D. G., dos Santos Izzo, R., Mazer, W. and Rose, J. L. 2021. “Equations controlling the strength of sedimentary silty soil–cement blends: Influence of voids/cement ratio and types of cement”. Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 15(3): 359-372.
Bandehzadeh O., Davoudi, M. H. and Astaneh, M. F. 2011. “Study of the effect of lime and percentage of lime and flyash aggregate on the physical and mechanical properties of fine grained soils”. Modares Civ. Eng. J., 11(3). [In Persian]
Bozyigit, I., Bulbul, F., Alp, C. and Altun, S. 2021. “Effect of randomly distributed pet bottle strips on mechanical properties of cement stabilized kaolin clay”. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 24(5): 1090-1101.
Bualuang, T., Jitsangiam, P., Nusit, K., Rattanasak, U. and Chindaprasirt, P. 2024. “Enhancing lateritic soil for sustainable pavement subbase with polymer-modified cement: A comparative study of styrene butadiene rubber and styrene acrylic latex applications”. Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 21: e03760.
Consoli, N. C., Foppa, D., Festugato, L. and Heineck, K. S. 2007. “Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils”. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(2): 197-205.
Ding, F., Song, L. and Yue, F. 2022. “Study on mechanical properties of cement-improved frozen soil under uniaxial compression based on discrete element method”. Processes, 10(2): 324.
Eslami, A. 2004. “Foundation engineering design and construction. BHRC Publication, Tehran, pp. 77-96.
Forcelini, M., Garbin, G. R., Faro, V. P. and Consoli, N. C. 2016. “Mechanical behavior of soil cement blends with Osorio sand. Proc. Eng., 143: 75-81.
Güllü, H., Canakci, H. and Al Zangana, I. F. 2017. “Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing”. Constr. Build. Mater., 137: 12-20.
Haq Sheno, H. and Arabani, M. 2008. “The effects of polymer fiber waste on the strength properties of sand stabilized with cement. 4th National Congress of Civil Engineering. [In Persian]
Hara, H. and Shirabe, Y. 2023. “Strength estimation method for arbitrary age of cement-treated soil based on high-temperature curing history”. Soils Found., 63(2): 101295.
Hu, Z., Wang, Y. and Wang, C. 2023. “Study on mechanical properties of dredged silt stabilized with cement and reinforced with alginate fibers”. Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 18: e01977.
Khatibi, M., Raeesi Estabragh, A., Abbasi, N. and Abdolahi Alibeyk, J. 2015. “Experimental assessment of soil-cement mechanical behavior incorporated with organic pollution”. Iran. J. Soil Water Res., 46(1): 141-149. [In Persian]
Kholoosi, M. M., Raeesi Estabragh, A. and Abdollahi, J. 2017. “Effect of cement on geotechnical properties of hydrocarbon-contaminated clay soil”. Modares Civ. Eng. J., 17(2): 93-106. [In Persian]
Kumar, A. and Gupta, D. 2016. “Behavior of cement-stabilized fiber-reinforced pond ash, rice husk ash–soil mixtures”. Geotext. and Geomembranes, 44(3): 466-474.
Liu, W., Huang, X., Yin, W. and Liu, G. 2025. “Static and dynamic characteristics of cement-treated and untreated aeolian sand from the Tengger desert hinterland: Laboratory tests and prediction models”. Constr. Build. Mater., 458: 139733.
Mola-Abasi H. and Pasha, E. 2016. “Evaluation of zeolite effect on strength of babolsar sand stabilized with cement using unconfined compression test”. Modares C. Eng. J., 16(5): 203-213. [In Persian]
Mola-Abasi, H. and Shooshpasha, I. 2016. “Influence of zeolite and cement additions on mechanical behavior of sandy soil”. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 8(5): 746-752.
Moghadasnejad, F. and Modarres, A. 2010. “Soil stabilization with waterproof cement for road applications. Amirkabir J. Civ. Eng., 42(1): 55-63. [In Persian]
Moreira, E. B., Baldovino, J. A., Rose, J. L. and dos Santos Izzo, R. L. 2019. “Effects of porosity, dry unit weight, cement content and void/cement ratio on unconfined compressive strength of roof tile waste-silty soil mixtures”. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 11(2): 369-378.
Muhunthan, B. and Sariosseiri, F. 2008. “Interpretation of geotechnical properties of cement treated soils”. Washington State Department of Transportation.
Naseri, F., Irani, M. and Dehkhodarajabi, M. 2016. “Effect of graphene oxide nanosheets on the geotechnical properties of cemented silty soil”. Arch. of Civ. Mech. Eng., 16: 695-701.
Pochalard, S., Wungsumpow, C. and Piriyakul, K. 2025. “Enhancement of compressive strength in cement admixed Bangkok Clay with glass fiber and bottom ash for eco-friendly functional road materials”. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct., 12(2): 279-292.
Redjem, M., Hidjeb, M., Lamri, I. and Boudjellal, K. 2023. “Unconfined compressive strength of weakly cemented compacted sand under different loads”. Geotech. Eng., 54(4): 00465828.
Ribeiro, D., Néri, R. and Cardoso, R. 2016. “Influence of water content in the UCS of soil-cement mixtures for different cement dosages”. Proc. Eng., 143: 59-66.
Santana, T., Gonçalves, J., Pinho, F. and Micaelo, R. 2021. “Effects of the ratio of porosity to volumetric cement content on the unconfined compressive strength of cement bound fine grained soils”. Infrastruct., 6(7): 96.
Sariosseiri, F. and Muhunthan, B. 2009. “Effect of cement treatment on geotechnical properties of some Washington State soils”. Eng. Geol., 104(1-2): 119-125.
Sariosseiri, F., Razavi, M., Carlson, K. and Gh., B. 2011. “Stabilization of soils with portland cement and CKD and application of CKD on slope erosion control”. Geo-Frontiers 2011: Adv. Geotech. Eng., pp. 778-787.
Sarkar, G., Islam, Md. R., Alamgir, M. and Rokonuzzaman, Md. 2012. “Study on the geotechnical properties of cement based composite fine-grained soil”. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Geotech. Eng., 1(2): 42-49.
Sedighi, P., Eslami, A. and Aflaki, E. 2014. “Effect of cement treatment on shear strength parameters of difficult soil from southern coastlines of the Caspian Sea”. Sharif J. Civ. Eng., 29-2(4): 97-107. [In Persian]
Taherkhani, H. 2016. “Investigatation and comparison of compressive strength of clay soils stabilized by cement, lime and CBR Plus”. Modares Civ. Eng. J., 16(4): 161-174.
Tajdini, M., HajialilueBonab, M. and Hassanzadeh, M. 2016. “Laboratory investigation of effective parameters in compressive and bending strength of cement soil materials and numerical investigation of the use of these materials for the Bakhtiari dam. Sharif J. Civ. Eng., 32.2(3.1): 35-46. [In Persian]
Vu, T. B., Dang, V. Q., Ngo, Q. A. and Ho, L. S. 2023. “Influence of some factors on the mechanical properties of cement-treated clay for shallow mixing in Vietnam: A comparative study”. Results Eng., 17: 101011.
Wu, Z., Deng, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Q., Chen, Y. and Zha, F. 2016. “Strength and micro-structure evolution of compacted soils modified by admixtures of cement and metakaolin”. Appl. Clay Sci., 127: 44-51.
Yao, K., Pan, Y., Jia, L., Yi, J. T., Hu, J. and Wu, C. 2020. “Strength evaluation of marine clay stabilized by cementitious binder”. Marine Georesour. Geotech., 38(6): 730-743.
Yilmazoğlu, M. U. 2024. “Effect of bone ash and rice husk ash on the unconfined compressive strength of silt soil”. Kastamonu University J. Eng. Sci., 10(1): 22-28.
Yi, Y., Liska, M. and Al-Tabbaa, A. 2014. “Properties of two model soils stabilized with different blends and contents of GGBS, MgO, lime, and PC”. J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 26(2): 267-274.
Yoon, S. and Abu-Farsakh, M. 2009. “Laboratory investigation on the strength characteristics of cement-sand as base material”. KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 13: 15-22. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 181 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 32 |
||