Prediction and Optimization of Viscosity of Ethylene Glycol based ZnO Nanofluids using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

[1]   Cheng, Z., et al., 2021. New insights into the effects of methane and oxygen on heat/mass transfer in reactive porous media. International communications in heat and mass transfer, 129, p. 105652.

[2]   Zhang, X., et al., 2016. A novel aluminum–graphite dual-ion battery. Advanced energy materials, 6(11), p. 1502588.

[3]   Zhao, T.H., Khan, M.I., Chu, Y.M., 2023. Artificial neural networking (ANN) analysis for heat and entropy generation in flow of non‐Newtonian fluid between two rotating disks. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 46(3), pp. 3012-3030.

[4]   Chu, Y.-M., et al., 2021. Enhancement in thermal energy and solute particles using hybrid nanoparticles by engaging activation energy and chemical reaction over a parabolic surface via finite element approach. Fractal and Fractional, 5(3), p. 119.

[5]   Hosseini Fakhrabad, A., et al., 2021. Fabrication a composite carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) modified with multi-wall carbon nano-tubes (MWCNTs/N, N-Bis (salicyliden)-1, 3-propandiamine) for determination of lanthanum (III). Eurasian chem. commun, 3, pp. 627-634.

[6]   Abdolvahab, R.H., Meymian, M.Z., Soudmand, N., 2020. Characterization of ZnO, Cu and Mo composite thin films in different annealing temperatures. Chem. Methodol., 4(3), pp. 276-284.

[7]   Farhadi, B., Ebrahimi, M., Morsali, A., 2021. Microextraction and determination trace amount of propranolol in aqueous and pharmaceutical samples with oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Methodol, 5, pp. 227-233.

[8]   Ranjbarzadeh, R., Meghdadi Isfahani, A., Hojaji, M., 2018. Experimental investigation of heat transfer and friction coefficient of the water/graphene oxide nanofluid in a pipe containing twisted tape inserts under air cross-flow. Experimental Heat Transfer, 31(5), pp. 373-390.

[9]   Mahian, O., et al., 2021. Recent advances in using nanofluids in renewable energy systems and the environmental implications of their uptake. Nano Energy, 86, p. 106069.

[10] Khan, A.M., et al., 2021. Energy, environmental, economic, and technological analysis of Al-GnP nanofluid-and cryogenic LN2-assisted sustainable machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Metals, 11(1), p. 88.

[11] Sidik, N.A.C., et al., 2016. Recent progress on hybrid nanofluids in heat transfer applications: a comprehensive review. International communications in heat and mass Transfer, 78, pp. 68-79.

[12] Raei, B., et al., 2017. Experimental study on the heat transfer and flow properties of γ-Al₂O₃/water nanofluid in a double-tube heat exchanger. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 127(3), pp. 2575-2561.

[13] Raei, B., et al., 2016. Experimental investigation on the heat transfer performance and pressure drop characteristics of γ-Al₂O₃/water nanofluid in a double tube counter flow heat exchanger. Transport Phenomena in Nano and Micro Scales, 5(1), pp. 64-75.

[14] Mashaei, P., et al., 2016. Numerical simulation of nanofluid application in a horizontal mesh heat pipe with multiple heat sources: a smart fluid for high efficiency thermal system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100, pp. 1016-1030.

[15] Raei, B., Forced convective heat transfer of MgO/water nanofluid under constant heat flux: experimental and statistical investigation. Challenges in Nano and Micro Scale Science and Technology, 2021. 9(1), p. 69-80.

[16] Choi, S.U.S. 1995. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In Proceedings of the 1995 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York, USA.

[17] Selimefendigil, F., Öztop, H.F., 2018. Modeling and optimization of MHD mixed convection in a lid-driven trapezoidal cavity filled with alumina–water nanofluid: Effects of electrical conductivity models. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 136, pp. 264-278.

[18] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2018. Rheological behavior characteristics of ZrO2-MWCNT/10w40 hybrid nano-lubricant affected by temperature, concentration, and shear rate: An experimental study and a neural network simulating. Physica E: Low-dimensional systems and nanostructures. 102, pp. 160-170.

[19] Dogonchi, A., Selimefendigil, F., Ganji, D., 2019. Magneto-hydrodynamic natural convection of CuO-water nanofluid in complex shaped enclosure considering various nanoparticle shapes. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 29(5), pp. 1663-1679.

[20] Selimefendigil, F., Öztop, H.F., 2022. Effects of a rotating tube bundle on the hydrothermal performance for forced convection in a vented cavity with Ag–MgO/water hybrid and CNT–water nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147(1), pp. 939-956.

[21] Chamkha, A.J., et al., 2018. On the nanofluids applications in microchannels: a comprehensive review. Powder technology, 332, pp. 287-322.

[22] Pandya, N.S., et al., 2020. Heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids in plate heat exchangers: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids. 81, pp. 173-190.

[23] Chalespari, S.K., Marzban, A., Toghraie, D., 2024. Experimental investigation of dynamic viscosity of water-based nanofluids containing tungsten oxide–multi-walled carbon nanotubes–zirconium oxide nanoparticles at mono and hybrid conditions. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[24] Barkhordar, A., Ghasemiasl, R., Armaghani, T., 2022. Statistical study and a complete overview of nanofluid viscosity correlations: a new look. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147(13), pp. 7099-7132.

[25] Mishra, P.C., et al., 2014. A brief review on viscosity of nanofluids. International nano letters, 4, pp. 109-120.

[26] Esfe, M.H., Saedodin, S., 2014. An experimental investigation and new correlation of viscosity of ZnO–EG nanofluid at various temperatures and different solid volume fractions. Experimental thermal and fluid science, 55, pp. 1-5.

[27] Yalçın, G., et al., 2023. The influence of particle size on the viscosity of water based ZnO nanofluid. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 68, pp. 561-576.

[28] Li, H., et al., 2015. Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol based ZnO nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 88, pp. 363-368.

[29] Pastoriza-Gallego, M., et al., 2014. Thermophysical profile of ethylene glycol-based ZnO nanofluids. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 73, pp. 23-30.

[30] Gamal, M., et al., 2023. Thermophysical characterization on water and ethylene glycol/water-based MgO and ZnO nanofluids at elevated temperatures: An experimental investigation. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 369, p. 120867.

[31] Siddiqi, H., 2022. Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of ZnO/DIW based nanofluids in small diameter compact channels: an experimental study, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 39, p. 102441.

[32] Cabaleiro, D., et al., 2015. Transport properties and heat transfer coefficients of ZnO/(ethylene glycol+ water) nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 89, pp. 433-443.

[33] Sharma, R., et al., 2022. Characterization of ZnO/nanofluid for improving heat transfer in thermal systems. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62, pp. 1904-1908.

[34] Jeong, J., et al., 2013. Particle shape effect on the viscosity and thermal conductivity of ZnO nanofluids. International journal of refrigeration, 36(8), pp. 2233-2241.

[35] Rostamian, H., Lotfollahi, M.N., 2015. A new simple equation of state for calculating solubility of solids in supercritical carbon dioxide. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 59(3), pp. 174-185.

[36] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2015. Applicability of artificial neural network and nonlinear regression to predict thermal conductivity modeling of Al₂O₃–water nanofluids using experimental data. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 66, pp. 246-249.

[37] Dalkilic, A., et al., 2016. Prediction of graphite nanofluids' dynamic viscosity by means of artificial neural networks. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 73, pp. 33-42.

[38] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2015. Designing an artificial neural network to predict thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of ferromagnetic nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 68, pp. 50-57.

[39] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2022. The effect of different parameters on ability of the proposed correlations for the rheological behavior of SiO2-MWCNT (90: 10)/SAE40 oil-based hybrid nano-lubricant and presenting five new correlations. ISA transactions, 128, pp. 488-497.

[40] Hemmat Esfe, M., Saedodin, S., 2022. Investigating the Behavior of SiO2 (90%)-MWCNT (10%)/SAE50 Hybrid Nanofluid and Modeling its Viscosity. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, pp. 1-12.

[41] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2023. Using the RSM to evaluate the rheological behavior of SiO2 (60%)-MWCNT (40%)/SAE40 oil hybrid nanofluid and investigating the effect of different parameters on the viscosity. Tribology International, 184, p. 108479.

[42] Baghoolizadeh, M., et al., 2023. Using different machine learning algorithms to predict the rheological behavior of oil SAE40-based nano-lubricant in the presence of MWCNT and MgO nanoparticles. Tribology International, 187, p. 108759.

[43] Demirpolat, A.B., Baykara, M., 2021. Investigation and prediction of ethylene Glycol based ZnO nanofluidic heat transfer versus magnetic effect by deep learning. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 25, p. 101034.

[44] Baghoolizadeh, M., et al., 2024. Prediction and extensive analysis of MWCNT-MgO/oil SAE 50 hybrid nano-lubricant rheology utilizing machine learning and genetic algorithms to find ideal attributes. Tribology International, 195, p. 109582.

[45] Song, X., et al., 2024. Utilizing machine learning algorithms for prediction of the rheological behavior of ZnO (50%)-MWCNTs (50%)/Ethylene glycol (20%)-water (80%) nano-refrigerant. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 156, p. 107634.

[46] Hussein, S.A., et al., 2024. Applying different machine learning algorithms to predict the viscosity behavior of MWCNT–alumina/water–ethylene glycol (20: 80) hybrid antifreeze. International Journal of Thermofluids, 24, p. 100966.

[47] Graish, M.S., et al., 2025. Prediction of the viscosity of iron-CuO/water-ethylene glycol non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluids using different machine learning algorithms. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 11, p. 101180.

[48] Shekhar, et al., 2025. Predicting nanofluid density in ethylene glycol-based oxide nanoparticles using machine learning approach: GBR–GSO models. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[49] Demirpolat, A.B., Uyar, M.M., Arslanoğlu, H., 2025, Heat transfer with MgO nanofluid in laminar flow: experimental study and ANSYS modeling. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 150(1), pp. 813-820.

[50] Mahanta, C., Sharma, R.P., 2025. Contrasting analysis of tetra and ternary nanofluid dynamics over linear/exponential stretching sheets with variable thermal conductivity: an RSM approach. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 150(1), pp. 649-671.

[51] Mahanta, C., Sharma, R.P., 2025. Enhanced heat transfer rate analysis with Ohmic heating, and multiple slips over exponentially stretching/shrinking plate on MHD hybrid nanofluid: Response surface methodology. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, p. e202400479.

[52] Kumar, V.V., Sharma, R.P., 2025. Entropy generation minimization in nuclear reactor cooling via rough rotating disk: a statistical approach. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 8(5), p. 245.

[53] Sharma, A., Sharma, R.P., 2025. Statistical and numerical analysis of MHD nanofluid (TiO2/EG) flow on a nonlinear curved stretching surface with heat source: A RSM approach. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 105(1), p. e202400513.

[54] Shamshuddin, M.D., Prakash Sharma, R., 2023. Thermal elaboration of ethylene glycol-based magnetized nanostructures via a convective permeable heated vertical surface employing modified Buongiorno model. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 571, p. 170588.

[55] Mondal, S., Ghosh, R., Sharma, R.P., 2023. Entropy Generation Effects on Hydromagnetic Williamson Nanofluid Flow through a Porous Media. Nanoscience & Nanotechnology-Asia, 13(1).

[56] Prakash, O., et al., 2023. Hybrid nanofluid MHD motion towards an exponentially stretching/shrinking sheet with the effect of thermal radiation, heat source and viscous dissipation. Pramana, 97(2), p. 64.

[57] Swain, L., Sharma, R.P., Mishra, S., 2025. Analysis of bio-convection-driven conducting flow of Williamson nanofluid through an expanding surface with activation energy. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[58] Sharma, R.P., et al., 2024. Significance of homogeneous–heterogeneous reaction on MHD nanofluid flow over a curvilinear stretching surface. Pramana, 98(4), pp. 1-11.

[59] Sharma, R.P., et al., 2024. Impact of radiation, melting, and chemical reaction on magnetohydrodynamics nanoparticle aggregation flow across parallel plates. Journal of Central South University, 31(10), pp. 3715-3729.

[60] Sharma, R.P., et al., 2024. Influence of heat source/sink on a rotating cone in a rotating nanofluid with magnetic field impact: Application of Hosoya polynomial‐based collocation method. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 104(9), p. e202400294.

[61] Mishra, S.R., Sharma, R.P., Swain, L., 2024. Illustration of Joule dissipation on the time-dependent stagnation point flow of nanofluid through a porous surface. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 38(05), p. 2450077.

[62] Shamshuddin, M.D., et al., 2024. Induced magnetic transportation of Soret and dissipative effects on Casson fluid flow towards a vertical plate with thermal and species flux conditions. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 38(11), p. 2450157.

[63] Sharma, R.P., et al., 2024. Illustration of thermal radiation on the mixed convection of Williamson nanofluid over an inclined cylindrical surface. Modern Physics Letters B, 38(25), p. 2450141.

[64] Sharma, R.P., Gorai, D., 2024. Unveiling the dynamic symphony of melting heat transfer in the flow between a stretching Riga plate and a squeezing plate. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 156, p. 107565.

[65] Shukla, S., et al., 2024. Investigation of thermodynamics characteristics of ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet. Modern Physics Letters B, 38(12), p. 2450079.

[66] Chu, Y.-M., et al., 2021. Examining rheological behavior of MWCNT-TiO2/5W40 hybrid nanofluid based on experiments and RSM/ANN modeling. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 333, p. 115969.

[67] Demirpolat, A.B., Das, M., 2019. Prediction of viscosity values of nanofluids at different pH values by alternating decision tree and multilayer perceptron methods. Applied Sciences, 9(7), p. 1288.

[68] Esfe, M.H., Arani, A.A.A., 2018. An experimental determination and accurate prediction of dynamic viscosity of MWCNT (% 40)-SiO2 (% 60)/5W50 nano-lubricant. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 259, pp. 227-237.

[69] Demirpolat, A.B., Das, M., 2020. Cuo ve Zno İçeren Nanoakışkanların Termofiziksel Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Yapay Sinir Ağı İle Modellenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 11(1), pp. 225-238.

[70] Demirpolat, A.B., Daş, M., 2018. (Cuo) copper oxide nanoparticle production and determination of heat transfer coefficient. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 7(11), pp. 74-80.

[71] Baghoolizadeh, M., et al., 2024. Using of artificial neural networks and different evolutionary algorithms to predict the viscosity and thermal conductivity of silica-alumina-MWCN/water nanofluid. Heliyon, 10(4).

[72] Rostamzadeh-Renani, R., et al., 2023. Prediction of the thermal behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes-CuO-CeO2 (20-40-40)/water hybrid nanofluid using different types of regressors and evolutionary algorithms for designing the best artificial neural network modeling. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 84, p. 184-203.

[73] Jin, W., et al., 2024. Regression modeling and multi-objective optimization of rheological behavior of non-Newtonian hybrid antifreeze: Using different neural networks and evolutionary algorithms. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 155, p. 107578.

[74] Zhou, H., et al., 2024. Combination of group method of data handling neural network with multi-objective gray wolf optimizer to predict the viscosity of MWCNT-TiO2-oil SAE50 nanofluid. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 64, p. 105541.

[75] Refaish, A.H., et al., 2025. Using Different Evolutionary Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict the Rheological Behavior of a New Nano-lubricant Containing Multi-walled carbon nanotube and zinc oxide Nano-powders in Oil 10W40 Base Fluid. International Journal of Thermofluids, p. 101092.

[76] Rostamzadeh-Renani, R., et al., 2024. Multi-objective optimization of rheological behavior of nanofluids containing CuO nanoparticles by NSGA II, MOPSO, and MOGWO evolutionary algorithms and Group Method of Data Handling Artificial neural networks. Materials Today Communications, 38, p. 107709.

[77] Hemmat Esfe, M., et al., 2024. Investigating the viscosity of hybrid nano-lubricant containing MWCNTs with ANN modeling to introduce the best and most optimal lubricant. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 149(10), p. 4561-4573.

[78] Gao, J., et al., 2024. An RBF-based artificial neural network for prediction of dynamic viscosity of MgO/SAE 5W30 oil hybrid nano-lubricant to obtain the best performance of energy systems. Materials Today Communications, 38, p. 107836.

[79] Arjmandi, H., Amiri, P., Pour, M.S., 2020. Geometric optimization of a double pipe heat exchanger with combined vortex generator and twisted tape: A CFD and response surface methodology (RSM) study. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 18, p. 100514.

[80] Ma, M., et al., 2020. Statistical image analysis of uniformity of hybrid nanofluids and prediction models of thermophysical parameters based on artificial neural network (ANN). Powder Technology, 362, pp. 257-266.

[81] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2018. Prediction and optimization of thermophysical properties of stabilized Al₂O₃/antifreeze nanofluids using response surface methodology. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 261, pp. 14-20.

[82] Esfe, M.H., Motallebi, S.M., Toghraie, D., 2022. Optimal viscosity modelling of 10W40 oil-based MWCNT (40%)-TiO2 (60%) nanofluid using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Heliyon, 8(12).

[83] Esfe, M.H., Motallebi, S.M., Toghraie, D., 2022. Modeling and optimization of dynamic viscosity of oil-based nanofluids containing alumina particles and carbon nanotubes by response surface methodology (RSM). Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 39(10), p. 2800-2809.

[84] Khetib, Y., et al., 2023. Competition of ANN and RSM techniques in predicting the behavior of the CuO-liquid paraffin. Chemical Engineering Communications, 210(6), pp. 880-892.

[85] Esfe, M.H., et al., 2024. Applying knowledge management in optimal modeling of viscosity of nanofluids by response surface methodology for use in automobiles engine. Materials Today Communications, 39, p. 108897.

[86] Hemmat Esfe, M., et al., 2025. Experimental study of thermal conductivity of SWCNT–TiO2–CuO (10: 70: 20)/water ternary hybrid nanofluid (THNF) and providing a new equation using response surface methodology. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, p. 1-13.

[87] Li, J., et al., 2024. Multi-objective optimization of a laterally perforated-finned heat sink with computational fluid dynamics method and statistical modeling using response surface methodology. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 130, p. 107674.

[88] Qamar, A., et al., 2020. Preparation and dispersion stability of aqueous metal oxide nanofluids for potential heat transfer applications: a review of experimental studies. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, pp. 1-24.

[89] Li, X., Zhu, D., Wang, X., 2007. Evaluation on dispersion behavior of the aqueous copper nano-suspensions. Journal of colloid and interface science, 310(2), pp. 456-463.

[90] Raei, B., Peyghambarzadeh, S.M., 2019. Measurement of Local Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient of Alumina-Water Nanofluids in a Double Tube Heat Exchanger. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum engineering, 53(1), pp. 25-36.

[91] Wei, X., Wang, L., 2010. Synthesis and thermal conductivity of microfluidic copper nanofluids. Particuology, 8(3), pp. 262-271.

[92] Teng, T.-P., et al., 2010. The effect of alumina/water nanofluid particle size on thermal conductivity. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(14-15), p. 2213-2218.

[93] Saeedi, A.H., Akbari, M., Toghraie, D., 2018. An experimental study on rheological behavior of a nanofluid containing oxide nanoparticle and proposing a new correlation. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 99, p. 285-293.

[94] Lau, H.-L., et al., 2023. Optimization of fermentation medium components by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network hybrid with genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) for lipase production by Burkholderia cenocepacia ST8 using used automotive engine oil as substrate. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 50, p. 102696.

[95] Elcioglu, E.B., et al., 2018. Experimental study and Taguchi Analysis on alumina-water nanofluid viscosity. Applied Thermal Engineering, 128, pp. 973-981.

[96] Aybar, H.Ş., et al., 2015. A review of thermal conductivity models for nanofluids. Heat Transfer Engineering, 36(13), pp. 1085-1110.

[97] Yıldız, Ç., Arıcı, M., Karabay, M., 2019. Comparison of a theoretical and experimental thermal conductivity model on the heat transfer performance of Al₂O₃-SiO2/water hybrid-nanofluid. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 140, pp. 598-605.

[98] Einstein, A., 1906. A new determination of the molecular dimensions. Ann.physics, 19, pp. 289-306.

[99] Brinkman, H.C., 1952. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. The Journal of chemical physics, 20(4), p. 571.

[100]      Batchelor, G., 1977. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. Journal of fluid mechanics, 83(1), pp. 97-117.

[101]      Maı̈ga, S.E.B., et al., 2004. Heat transfer behaviours of nanofluids in a uniformly heated tube. Superlattices and Microstructures, 35(3-6), p. 543-557.

[102]      De Bruijn, H., 1942. The viscosity of suspensions of spherical particles (The fundamental η‐c and φ relations). Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays‐Bas, 61(12), pp. 863-874.

[103]      Hatschek, E., 1913. The general theory of viscosity of two-phase systems. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 9, p. 80-92.

[104]      Vand, V., 1945. Theory of viscosity of concentrated suspensions. Nature, 155(3934), pp. 364-365.

[105]      Ho, C., et al., 2010. Natural convection heat transfer of alumina-water nanofluid in vertical square enclosures: an experimental study. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 49(8), pp. 1345-1353.

[106]      Chen, H., et al., 2007. Rheological behaviour of ethylene glycol based titania nanofluids. Chemical physics letters, 444(4-6), pp. 333-337.

[107]      Nguyen, C., et al., 2007. Temperature and particle-size dependent viscosity data for water-based nanofluids–hysteresis phenomenon. International journal of heat and fluid flow, 28(6), pp. 1492-1506.

[108]      Williams, W., Buongiorno, J., Hu, L.W., 2008. Experimental investigation of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure loss of alumina/water and zirconia/water nanoparticle colloids (nanofluids) in horizontal tubes. Journal of Heat Transfer, 130(4), p. 042412.

[109]      Godson, L., et al., 2010. Experimental investigation on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of silver-deionized water nanofluid. Experimental Heat Transfer, 23(4), pp. 317-332.

[110]      Heyhat, M., et al., Experimental investigation of turbulent flow and convective heat transfer characteristics of alumina water nanofluids in fully developed flow regime. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012. 39(8), p. 1272-1278.

[111]      Li, F., et al., 2019. Effects of ultrasonic time, size of aggregates and temperature on the stability and viscosity of Cu-ethylene glycol (EG) nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 129, pp. 278-286.

[112]      Żyła, G., Fal, J., 2017. Viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of silicon dioxide–ethylene glycol transparent nanofluids: An experimental studies. Thermochimica acta, 650, pp. 106-113.

[113]      Toghraie, D., Alempour, S.M., Afrand, M., 2016. Experimental determination of viscosity of water based magnetite nanofluid for application in heating and cooling systems. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 417, pp. 243-248.

[114]      Tseng, W.J., Chen, C.-N., 2003. Effect of polymeric dispersant on rheological behavior of nickel–terpineol suspensions. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 347(1-2), pp. 145-153.

[115]      Pak, B.C., Cho, Y.I., 1998. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer an International Journal, 11(2), pp. 151-170.

[116]      Abu-Nada, E., 2009. Effects of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al₂O₃–water nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement in natural convection. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30(4), pp. 679-690.