پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 679 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,900 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 70,091,996 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 49,408,217 |
تعیین ارزش غذایی بذرکینوا (Chenopodium quinoa) به روشهای آزمایشگاهی (آزمون تولید گاز و روش آزمایشگاهی تیلی و تری) و روش کیسههای نایلونی | ||
| تحقیقات آزمایشگاهی دامپزشکی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 27، فروردین 1404، صفحه 83-96 اصل مقاله (573.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jvlr.2025.37462.1163 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی مهدوی* 1؛ فاطمه ملک علائی1؛ عطا مهدوی2؛ بابک دارابی قانع3؛ سینا محبوب ربانی4 | ||
| 1گروه بهداشت و کنترل کیفی مواد غذایی، دانشکده دامپزشکی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران | ||
| 2گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 4گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده مهندسی کشاورزی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 31 فروردین 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 خرداد 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 13 خرداد 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| گیاه کینوا به دلیل مقاومت به خشکی و شوری و دارا بودن ترکیبات مغذی و پروتئین با کیفیت بالا، بهعنوان گزینهای مناسب در تغذیه دام، بهویژه در مناطق خشک و نیمهخشک مطرح است. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی ترکیب شیمیایی، قابلیت هضم و ارزش تغذیهای بذر کینوا انجام شد. نمونهبرداری از ۲۰ پایه گیاه از مرتع صورت گرفت و پس از شناسایی، آزمایشهای تجزیه تقریبی، اندازهگیری مواد معدنی، الیاف، آزمونهای هضم آزمایشگاهی (تیلی و تری، تولید گاز) و تجزیهپذیری با کیسههای نایلونی انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که میزان ماده خشک 87/92، پروتئین خام 66/16، الیاف خام 2/4، چربی خام 9/4، الیاف نامحلول در شوینده خنثی 0/5، الیاف نامحلول در شوینده اسیدی 2/1، خاکستر خام 6/4، کلسیم 2775/0، فسفر 025/0، منیزیم 149/0 و پتاسیم 1385/1 درصد در ماده خشک بودند. همچنین میزان انرژی خام 06/4419 کالری بر گرم گزارش شد. نتایج تجزیهپذیری ماده خشک بذر کینوا به ترتیب در زمان 24، 48، 72 و 96 ساعت به ترتیب 1/60، 5/65، 9/68 و 6/72 و تجزیه پذیری پروتئین خام در زمانهای بیان شده به ترتیب 5/45، 96/76، 3/91 و 73/93 بوده است. این نتایج نشان داد که بذر کینوا با دارا بودن مقادیر بالاتر پروتئین خام، الیاف، چربی، خاکستر و انرژی خام نسبت به گندم، پتانسیل مناسبی برای استفاده در تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| کینوا؛ کیسههای نایلونی؛ گاز تست؛ تیلی و تری؛ تجزیه تقریبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Determination of nutritive value of Quinoa Seed (Chenopodium quinoa) using in vitro (Gas production and Tilly & Terry techniques) and nylon bag methods | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Mahdavi1؛ Fatemeh Malekalaie1؛ Ata Mahdavi2؛ Babak Darabighane3؛ Sina Mahbubrabani4 | ||
| 1Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Semnan, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| 83 Due to its resistance to drought and salinity, as well as its high nutritional content and superior protein quality, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is considered a suitable alternative feed resource for livestock, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. This study was conducted to evaluate the chemical composition, digestibility, and nutritional value of quinoa seeds. Sampling was performed on 20 plant genotypes from a rangeland, and following identification, analyses including proximate composition, mineral content, fiber fractions, in vitro digestibility tests (Tilley and Terry, gas production), and degradability using nylon bag technique were carried out. The results indicated that the dry matter content was 92.87%, crude protein 16.66%, crude fiber 4.2%, ether extract 4.9%, neutral detergent fiber 5.0%, acid detergent fiber 1.2%, ash 4.6%, calcium 0.2775%, phosphorus 0.025%, magnesium 0.149%, and potassium 1.1385% in dry matter. The gross energy content was reported as 4419.06 kcal/kg. The in situ dry matter degradability of quinoa seed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours was 60.1%, 65.5%, 68.9%, and 72.6%, respectively, while crude protein degradability at the mentioned times was 45.5%, 76.96%, 91.3%, and 93.73%, respectively. These findings suggest that quinoa seeds, owing to their higher crude protein, fiber, fat, ash, and gross energy contents compared to wheat, possess considerable potential as a feed ingredient for ruminants. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Chenopodium quinoa, Nylon bags, Gas production, Tilly & Terry, Approximate analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agricultural & Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report no. 9, Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B, Livest. Feeds and Feeding 62, 787 Aloo, B. N., Tripathi, V., Makumba, B. A., & Mbega, E. R. (2022). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production: The past, present, and future. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1002448. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1002448 Alipour, F., Vakili, A., Danesh Mesgaran, M., & Ebrahimi, H. (2018). Determine of the nutritional value of Saffron petals using in vitro gas production technique. 8th Iranian Animal Science Congress. [Persian] Angeli, V., Miguel Silva, P., Crispim Massuela, D., Khan, M. W., Hamar, A., Khajehei, F., Graeff-Hönninger, S., & Piatti, C. (2020). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An overview of the potentials of the “golden grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods, 9(2), 216. doi: 10.3390/foods9020216 AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis Associatioon of Official Analytical Chemists Washington DC. Baskaya‐Sezer, D. (2025). Comparison of sprouting, airfryer‐drying, and airfryer‐baking effects on technical, physical, and chemical properties of quinoa flour and quinoa snack. Journal of Food Science, 90(1), e17656. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17656 Ebad Sichani, M. R., Pourhadi, P., & Moghtadaiee Khorasgani, E. (2022). The Effect of Uinoa Extract on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Indices In Hamsters. [Persian] Ebeid, H. M., Kholif, A. E., El-Bordeny, N., Chrenkova, M., Mlynekova, Z., & Hansen, H. H. (2022). Nutritive value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) as a feed for ruminants: in sacco degradability and in vitro gas production. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(23), 35241-35252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18698-x Farokhi, H. (2018). Antioxidative properties comparison of Chenopodium quinoa leaves and seeds â extract: in vitro study. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 25(3), 353-361. [Persian] Filik, G. (2020). Biodegradability of quinoa stalks: The potential of quinoa stalks as a forage source or as biomass for energy production. Fuel, 266, 117064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117064 Ghavipanje, N., Fathi Nasari, M. H., Bashtani, M., & Farhangfar, H. (2021). Determination of chemical composition and estimate nutritional value of quinoa crop residues using nylon bag and gas production techniques. Journal of Animal Production, Print ISSN: 2008-6776., Online ISSN: 2382-994X, 23(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2020.293316.623473. [Persian] Getachew, G., Crovetto, G.M., Fondevila, M., Krishnamoorthy, U., Singh, B., Spanghero, M., Steingass, H., Robinson, P.H. and Kailas, M.M. (2002). Laboratory variation of 24 h in vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy values of ruminant feeds. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology. 102:169-180 Hawkins. G.E., KA Cummins, M. Silverio, and J.J. Jelek. (1985). Physiological effects of whole ooton seed in the diet of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 68: 2608-2614. Kamgar, K., Ghazi, S., Sadeghi, A., & Abdolmohammadi, A. (2024). Effects of using raw and treated quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) on performance, egg quality traits, antioxidant status and intestinal morphology in laying quails. Research Journal of Livestock Science, 37(143), 31-44. [Persian] Le, L., Gong, X., An, Q., Xiang, D., Zou, L., Peng, L., Wu, X., Tan, M., Nie, Z., & Wu, Q. (2021). Quinoa sprouts as potential vegetable source: Nutrient composition and functional contents of different quinoa sprout varieties. Food Chemistry, 357, 129752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129752 Linn, J.G., Martin, N.P. (1999). Forage Quality Tests and Interpretations. Mahdavi, A. (2002). Comparison between nylon bag (in situ) and gas production methods in the determination of feed nutritional value (Master’s thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran). [Persian] Mahdavi, A., & Nourizadeh Nashli, B. (2020). Determination of nutritive value, invitro digestibility and degradationof north rangeland of Semnan province (Chashm) and comparison with local livestock requirements. Journal of Veterinary Laboratory Research, 12(1), 89-102. doi: 10.22075/jvlr.2020.17789.1022. [Persian] McDonald, P. R., Edwards, A. J., Greehalgh, F. D., Moryan, C. A. 1995. Animal nutrition, fifth ed. Longman, Singapore. Menke, KH., Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Resource Development. 28, 7-55. Najafi, T., Dehghani, M., & Yousefollahi, M. (2014). D Determining of nutritive value of Cressa cretica plant in different phenological of growth stages with in vitro, in vivo and nylon bag methods in sistan. 2(45), 143–152. National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 6th Edition, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Orskov, E. R. (1991). Manipulation of fiber digestion in the rumen. Proceeding of Nutrition Society, 50, 187 – 196. Orskov, E. R., McDonald, P. (1979). The estimation of protein digestibility in the rumen from incubationmeasurements weighed according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge. 92, 499-503. Pirouti, Sh., Faraji, A., & Naghipour, F. (2020). Evaluation of the synergistic effect of quinoa seed flour and whey protein as gluten substitutes in the production of Yazdi cake based on rice flour. Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 12(1), 47–62. doi: 10.30495/jfst.2020.665333. [Persian] Plamquist, D. L., Jenkins, T. C. (1980). Fat in lactation rations. Review. Journal of Dairy Science. 61: 890-900. Poursalehi, M., Zeynali, F., Alizadeh Khaledabad, M., & Almasi, H. (2021). Production of functional chicken sausage by quinoa flour and studying of physicochemical and textural properties. Food Research Journal, 31(3), 85-107. doi: 10.22034/FR.2021.40141.1742. [Persian] Raoofi, M., & Giti, S. (2021). Effect of Weed Interference on Yield, Nutritional Value and Some Morphological Characteristics of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(3), 197-212. doi: 10.22034/saps.2021.43003.2582. [Persian] Ren, G., Teng, C., Fan, X., Guo, S., Zhao, G., Zhang, L., Liang, Z., & Qin, P. (2023). Nutrient composition, functional activity and industrial applications of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Chemistry, 410, 135290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135290 Riassi, A., Danesh Mesgaran, M., Nasiri Moghadam, H., & Zamiri, M. (2003). Determination of chemical composition, degradability coefficients, rumen-intestinal disappearance ratio, and digestibility models of dry matter and crude protein of four halophyte species (Kochia, Atriplex, Suaeda, and Tamarix). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Industries, 1(19), 100–111. [Persian] Roozbehan, Y. (1998). Determination of digestibility and degradability of some fibrous feedstuffs from Gilan province using in vitro and in sacco methods (Master’s thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran). [Persian] Shah, S. S., Shi, L., Li, Z., Ren, G., Zhou, B., & Qin, P. (2020). Yield, agronomic and forage quality traits of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes in northeast China. Agronomy, 10(12), 1908. doi:10.3390/agronomy10121908 Siddiqui, S. A., Erol, Z., Rugji, J., Taşçı, F., Kahraman, H. A., Toppi, V., Musa, L., Di Giacinto, G., Bahmid, N. A., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2023). An overview of fermentation in the food industry-looking back from a new perspective. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 10(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-023-00702-y Swenson, M. G., Reece, W. O. (1996). Duckes physiology of domestic animals. 11th ed. Cornell University Press. London. Taghizadeh, A., Shoja, J., Moghadam, G., Janmohammadi, H., & Yasan, P. (2001). Determination of dry matter and crude protein degradability of some fibrous and dense feedstuffs using in situ method in sheep. Agricultural Science Journal, 3(11), 93–100. [Persian] Taghizadeh, A., Janmohammadi, H., & Basharti, M. (2012). Determination of degradability and fermentation characteristics of some feedstuffs using nylon bag and laboratory methods. Research in Animal Sciences, 4(22), 1–16. [Persian] Tahmazi Y., Taghizadeh, A., Mehmannavaz, Y., & Moghadam, M. (2014). Determining of Degradation and Digestion Coefficients of Canola meal Using of In situ and Gas production Techniques. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 4(6), 312-323. doi: 10.22067/ijasr.v6i4.23501. [Persian] Tilley, J. M. A.,Terry, R. A.1963.A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 18(2), 104–111. Turgut, L., Yanar, M., Tuzemen, N., Comakil, B. (2008). Effect of maturity on chemical com osition in situ ruminal degradability kinetics of meadow hey in awassishee. Journal of Animal & Veterinary Advances, 7 (9), 1061- 1065. Valizadeh, R., Ghadami Koohestani, M., and Melati, F. (2010). Chemical Composition, In situ Degradability and In vitro Gas Production of Ephedra Plant (Ephedra intermedia). Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 2(3), 166-170. doi: 10.22067/ijasr.v3i2.11073. [Persian] Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Lews, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science. 74, 3583 – 3597. Wang, N., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Zhang, K., & Hu, M. (2023). Plant growth, salt removal capacity, and forage nutritive value of the annual euhalophyte Suaeda salsa irrigated with saline water. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1040520. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1040520 Yacout, M., Salama, R., Elgzar, M., & Awad, A. (2021). In vivo and in vitro studies to evaluate nutritional value of Chenopodium quinoa as unconventional forage resource for feeding ruminants. Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal, 4(2), 135-149. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/aasj.2021.212502 Yousefollahi, M., Peirovi, M., Mirzaei, H., & Chashnidel, Y. (2012). Evaluation of nutritional value of five halophytic plant species from Sistan region using in vitro gas production and in situ nylon bag techniques. Research on Animal Production, 9, 51–68. url: http://rap.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-394-fa.html. [Persian]
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 156 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 149 |
||