
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 648 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,475 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,306,377 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 47,823,925 |
A systematic study on the model for determining and identifying major audit issues: Using a content analysis approach | ||
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 17 مرداد 1404 اصل مقاله (854.73 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2025.37799.5471 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Aqeel Salim Mohammed1؛ Khadijeh Ebrahimi Kahrizsangi* 1؛ Dukhkhani Adil Basheer Dhahir2؛ Saeid Aliahmadi1 | ||
1Department of Accounting, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
2Department of Banking and Financial Sciences, University of Wasit, College of Administration and Economics, Iraq | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 30 فروردین 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 خرداد 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 تیر 1404 | ||
چکیده | ||
In today's complex financial world, identifying and disclosing major audit issues is crucial for transparency, accountability, public trust, and economic stability. This exploratory, mixed-methods study presents a comprehensive model examining key factors affecting this process. Due to the lack of a coherent framework, it identifies themes via content analysis of prior research and interviews with 14 experts (audit academics/professionals and Auditing Standards Development Committee members, purposively sampled via snowball approach). Results revealed 4 overarching themes: Regulatory/Professional Frameworks, Institutional/Environmental Structures, Client Characteristics, and Auditor Frameworks, along with 8 organizing themes (including ethical requirements, regulatory roles, institutional impacts, economic environment, client traits, and auditor characteristics) and 55 basic themes. Delphi analysis confirmed the reliability of these dimensions across two rounds. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) then identified Supervisory Structures as the most influential theme within the major audit issues pattern. This research advances auditing literature, particularly for developing countries, offering technical innovations and practical insights for policymakers and audit institutions to better understand auditor characteristics and drivers of major audit issues. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Major audit issues؛ supervisory frameworks؛ professional requirements؛ institutional structures | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] M. Afkhami and N. Fazeli, The impact of disclosing key audit matters in the independent auditor’s report on audit fees and audit report lag, Profess. Audit. Res. 4 (2024), no. 15, 1–20. [2] M. Amer, Predictors of organizational commitment, J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 56 (2021), no. 2, 568–580. [3] A.G. Backof, K. Bowlin, and B.M. Goodson, The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards, Contemp. Account. Res. 18 (2022), no. 1, 10–23. [4] M.K. Bepari, A.T. Mollik, S. Nahar, and M.N. Islam, Determinants of accounts level and entity level key audit matters: Further evidence, Account. Eur. 19 (2022), no. 3, 397-422. [5] L. Branicki, S. Brammer, M. Linnenluecke, and D. Houghton, Accounting for resilience: The role of the accounting professions in promoting resilience, Account. Bus. Res. 53 (2023), no. 5, 508-536. [6] M.D.M. Camacho-Minano, N. Munoz-Izquierdo, M. Pincus, and P. Wellmeyer, Are key audit matter disclosures useful in assessing the financial distress level of a client firm?, Br. Account. Rev. 56 (2023), no. 2, 101200. [7] M. Cameran and D. Campa, Key audit matters and audit outcomes: Evidence from the European Union, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4425465. [8] B.T. Carver and B.S. Trinkle, Nonprofessional investors’ reactions to the PCAOB’s proposed changes to the standard audit report, Carver, Brian Todd and Trinkle, Brad S., Nonprofessional Investors’ Reactions to the PCAOB’s Proposed Changes to the Standard Audit Report (2017), 1-60, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2930375. [9] S. Chiang, G. Kleinman, and P. Lee, The effect of auditor industry specialization and board independence on the cash flow reporting classification choices under IFRS: Evidence from Taiwan, Int. J. Account. Inf. Manag. 29 (2021), no. 1, 147–168. [10] E. Elshafie, Critical audit matters: Litigation, quality and conservatism, Rev. Account. Finance 22 (2023), no. 3, 294–328. [11] C. Ferreira and A.I. Morais, Analysis of the relationship between company characteristics and key audit matters disclosed, Rev. Contabil. Financas 31 (2019), no. 8, 262–274. [12] M.H. Ghaemi, M. Baraz, and M. Shahsavand, Content and determinants of key audit matter disclosure: The first year of implementing auditing standard 701 in Iran, Account. Audit. Rev. 31 (2024), no. 1, 1–20. [13] C. Goh, Analysts’ earnings per share forecasts: The effects of forecast uncertainty and forecast precision on investor judgements, J. Account. Finance Bus. Stud. 60 (2024), no. 1, 172–204. [14] E. Gutierrez, M. Minutti-Meza, K.W. Tatum, and M. Vulcheva, Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom, Revi. Account. Stud. 23 (2018), no. 6, 1543–1587. [15] Z. Heydari and Sh. Moshayekh, Consequences of disclosing key audit matters on investor judgment and decision[1]making, Empir. Account. Res. 15 (2025), no. 1, 53–84. [16] N. Jafarinasab Kermani and M. Molanazari, Current and new auditor’s report: Iranian auditors’ perspectives, Empir. Account. Res. 8 (2018), no. 28, 95–116. [17] N. Jafarinasab Kermani, A. Rahmani and M. Molanazari, Challenges and opportunities of changes in the auditor’s report in Iran, Accounting and Auditing Reviews 26 (2019), no. 3, 348-370. [18] S.J. Kachelmeier, J.J. Schmidt, and K. Valentine, The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report, Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin, 2017, pp. 1–48, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2481284. [19] J. Klevak, J. Livnat, D. Pei, W. Boonyanet, and K. Suslava, Are critical audit matters informative?, SSRN (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3685369. [20] E. Lynch, K. Laver, and T. Levy, The way that we are collecting and using data has evolved’: Evaluating the Australian National Stroke Audit programme to inform strategic direction, BMJ Open Qual. 12 (2023), no. 1, 1–9. [21] O.A. Mah’d and G.H. Mardini, Matters may matter: The disclosure of key audit matters in the Middle East, Cogent Econ. Finance 10 (2022), no. 1, 2111787. [22] D.A. Matsumoto, Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises, Account. Rev. 77 (2002), no 3, 483–514. [23] A. Ozcan, ¨ What factors affect the disclosure of key audit matters? Evidence from manufacturing firms, Uluslararası Yonetim Iktisat Isletme Dergisi 17 (2021), no. 1, 149–161. [24] E.T. Rapley, J.C. Robertson, and J.L. Smith, The effects of disclosing critical audit matters and auditor tenure on nonprofessional investors’ judgments, J. Account. Public Policy 40 (2021), no. 5, 106847. [25] X. Shao, Research on disclosure status and influencing factors of key audit matters, Mod. Econ. 11 (2020), no. 3, 701–725. [26] K.W. Smith, Tell me more: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom, Account. Organ. Soc. 108 (2023), no. 12, 101456. [27] M. Suttipun, Kam reporting and common share price of listed companies in the market of alternative investment from Thailand, Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J. 24 (2020), no. 3, 1–10. [28] C. Tangruenrat, The value of new auditor’s report, J. Account. Profess. 11 (2015), no. 31, 26–44. [29] I. Wahyuni, A. Chariri, and E.A. Yuyetta, Whistleblowing intention: Theory of planned behavior perspectives, J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus. 8 (2021), no. 1, 335-341. [30] Z. Zhang and Q. Luo, Retail investor attention and analyst earnings forecasts: Evidence from China, Pacific-Basin Finance J. 83 (2024), no. 2, 1-19. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 45 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |