Multi-Criteria Analysis and Prioritization of Bridge Construction Methods using AHP: Evaluation of Key Project Performance Criteria | ||
| مهندسی زیر ساخت های حمل و نقل | ||
| Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 43, November 2025, Pages 75-89 PDF (1.99 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22075/jtie.2025.37772.1723 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Hossein Khosravi* 1; Hadi Shakiba Zahed2; Vahid Keshmiri3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran. | ||
| 2aAssistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran. | ||
| 3MSc, Department of Civil Engineering of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran. | ||
| Receive Date: 16 May 2025, Revise Date: 28 July 2025, Accept Date: 11 August 2025 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Selecting an appropriate superstructure construction method is crucial for the success of bridge projects. This study aims to evaluate and prioritize various bridge construction methods using a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Five key criteria—quality, cost, safety, project duration, and structural form—were identified as the most influential factors in the decision-making process. The statistical population included engineers, contractors, consultants, and supervisors involved in bridge construction projects, from which 68 experts were selected through convenience sampling. Data collection was conducted using both library research and field methods, including interviews and questionnaires. Data analysis was carried out using Expert Choice software. The results indicate that the cable-stayed bridge construction method ranked highest with a priority weight of 0.280, making it the most suitable option for bridge implementation in Iran. Following this, incremental launching, prestressed concrete, precast concrete, span-by-span steel, balanced cantilever steel, and cast-in-place concrete methods were ranked accordingly. Among the criteria, safety was identified as the most significant factor across most construction methods, except for the prestressed concrete method, where quality held the highest importance. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for decision-makers in selecting bridge construction methods under various project conditions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Bridge construction methods,; Analytic Hierarchy, Performance,; Evaluation | ||
| References | ||
|
Afolayan, A. H., Ojokoh, B. A. and Adetunmbi, A. O. 2020. “Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection”. Sci. Afr., 9, e00471.
Cavallo, B. 2017. “Computing random consistency indices and assessing priority vectors reliability.” Inform. Sci., 420: 532-542.
Chaphalkar, N. B. and Shirke, P. P. 2013. “Application of multi-criteria decision making techniques for bridge construction”. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2(8): 3617-3626.
Fang, J. and Partovi, F. Y. 2021. “Criteria determination of analytic hierarchy process using a topic model”. Expert Syst. Appl., 169: 114306.
Ghiamat, R. and Madhkhan, M. 2021. “Analysis and optimal design of segmental precast concrete bridges with balanced cantilever construction (Case study: Esteghlal bridge in Isfahan)”. J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 8(4): 5-25.
Harandeh, M. R., Akbarpournik, A. and Rezaei, F. 2015. “New methods of implementation in the new bridge construction process (Concrete bridges with box sections)”. First National Conference of Urban Management of Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]
Jia, J., Ibrahim, M., Hadi, M., Orabi, W., Ali, M. and Xiao, Y. 2016. “Estimation of the total cost of bridge construction for use in accelerated bridge construction selection decisions”. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA.
Motaghi, A. and Golabchi, M. 2015. “Selection of the most appropriate structural system, construction method and materials for bridges using the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making method”. Second National Conference on Structural Engineering of Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]
Mu, E. and Pereyra-Rojas, M. 2016. “Practical decision making: An Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) using super decisions. V2, Springer.
Pak Baz, H., Safai Kouchasaraei, A. and Habibi, M. R. 2018. “Investigation of basic parameters of execution and construction of culvert structure (bridge) in the river course.” Quarter. J. Water Eng., 6(2): 124-131.
Pan, N. F. 2008. “Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method.” Automat. Constr.., 17(8): 958-965.
Bhola, P., A.-G. Chronis, P. Kotsampopoulos, and N. Hatziargyriou. 2023. “Business model selection for community energy storage: a multi criteria decision making approach.” Energies, 16(18): 6753.
Saffourizadeh Sehi, Gh. 2010. “A study of the history of bridge construction and their optimal safety assessment”. Fifth International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Green Cities. [In Persian]
Shariatmadar, H., Mohseni, S. and Mohseni, M. 2011. “Design and typology of prefabricated bridge decks with rapid installation capability”. 6th National Civil Engineering Congress, Semnan University, Iran. [In Persian]
Upadhya, P. R., Das, M. S. and Das, B. B. 2021. “Multi-criteria decision-making approach for selecting a bridge superstructure construction method”. In Recent Trends in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of TMSF 2019 (pp. 497-508), Springer, Singapore. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,319 PDF Download: 72 |
||