
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 655 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,581 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 68,524,000 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 47,974,828 |
The effect of thinking styles on the auditor's objectivity considering demographic characteristics | ||
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
مقاله 11، دوره 16، شماره 10، دی 2025، صفحه 113-124 اصل مقاله (626.79 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33572.5009 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Abdolnaser Belazh1؛ Mohammad Hamed Khan Mohammadi* 2؛ Hoshang Amiri3؛ Mohamad Khodamoradi4 | ||
1Department of Accounting, Khorramshahr-Persian Gulf International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramshahr, Iran | ||
2Department of Accounting, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran | ||
3Department of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran | ||
4Department of Statistics, Izeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Izeh, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 27 اسفند 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 خرداد 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
It is important and necessary to pay attention to the factors affecting auditors' judgments and decisions. Researchers believe that by identifying the personality traits of people, including auditors, their behavior and performance can be predicted. Therefore, it is possible to examine the auditor's objectivity by knowing the characteristics of people, including thinking styles. Therefore, based on this argument, the present study examines the impact of thinking styles on the auditor's objectivity by considering demographic characteristics. The statistical population studied in this research includes all audit employees working in audit institutions, members of the official accountants of Iran and the audit organization in 1401. In this questionnaire, Svanberg et al.'s \cite{40} questionnaire was used to measure the auditor's objectivity, and Sternberg's \cite{2} research questionnaire included 4 items (executive, judgmental, generalist, detailist) for the variable of thinking styles. SmartPLS third version software was used for data analysis. The results showed that, according to the obtained path coefficients, there is a positive relationship between the auditor's thinking styles and the auditor's objectivity, because the value obtained was greater than 1.96, which indicates the existence of a significant positive relationship between the auditor's thinking styles and the auditor's objectivity. Based on this, the first to fourth research hypotheses are accepted. Also, according to the fifth hypothesis, demographic characteristics directly and significantly affect the auditor's objectivity, and the fifth hypothesis is also accepted. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
thinking style؛ audit objectivity؛ demographic characteristics | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] A.Z. Abdullahi, E.B. Anarfo, and H. Anyigba, The impact of leadership style on organizational citizenship behavior: does leaders’ emotional intelligence play a moderating role?, J. Manag. Dev. 39 (2020), no. 9/10, 963–987. [2] M. Adili, A. Khodamipour, and O. Pourheidari, Investigation the effect of audit firm’s ethical culture and auditors personality types on auditor objectivity, J. Account. Audit. Res. 12 (2020), no. 46, 5–20. [In Persian] [3] B. Akanji, C. Mordi, A. Ituma, T.A. Adisa, and H. Ajonbadi, The influence of organisational culture on leadership style in higher education institutions, Person. Rev. 49 (2020), no. 3, 709–732. [4] S. Armstrong and S. Cools, Cognitive styles and their relevance for business and management, In: L.F. Zhang and R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Perspective on the nature of intellectual Styles, New York: Springer, 2009, pp. 253–290. [5] C. Arslanoglu, E. Dogan, and K. Acar, Investigation of decision making and thinking styles of volleyball referees in terms of some variables, J. Educ. Train. Stud. 6 (2018), no. 10, 21–28. [6] B. Badpa, O. Pourheidari, and A. Khodamipour, Investigating the effect of the transformational client leadership on auditor’s judgment and the mediating role of client identification, J. Account. Adv. 11 (2018), no. 1, 29–67. [7] J. Bakhtiari, Z. Poorzmani, and R.A. Royaee, Guanxi and auditor’s independence: Social connections theory test, Knowledge Account. Manage. Audit, 8 (2018), no. 30, 27–40. [In Persian] [8] N. Bashirimenesh and H. Nejati Mousavi, The effect of auditors’ personality characteristics on the perception of social responsibility and job satisfaction, J. Account. Audit. Stud. 11 (2022), no. 44, 91–112. [In Persian] [9] M.L. Cooper, M.E. Knight, M.L. Frazier, and D.W. Law, Conflict management style and exhaustion in public accounting, Manag. Audit. J. 34 (2019), no. 2, 118–141. [10] L.O. Dal Mas and K. Barac, The influence of the chief audit executive’s leadership style on factors related to internal audit effectiveness, Manag. Audit. J. 33 (2018), no. 8/9, 807–835. [11] N. Dazeh and M. Gerkaz, Relationship between moral reasoning, moral thinking, moral intention and moral Inclination among formal accountant, Ethics Sci. Technol. 10 (2014), no. 1, 115–136. [In Persian] [12] D.H. El-Sayed, E. Adel, O. Elmougy, N. Fawzy, N. Hatem, and F. Elhakey, The influence of narrative disclosure readability, information ordering and graphical representations on non-professional investors’ judgment: Evidence from an emerging market, J. Appl. Account. Res. 22 (2021), no. 1, 138–167. [13] C. Fornell and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Market. Res. 18 (1981), no. 1, 39–50. [14] L.R. Fuller and T.J. Shawver, Will cognitive style impact whistleblowing intentions?, C.R. Baker (Ed.), Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, Vol. 23, 2020, pp. 47–62. [15] H. Geravand, Modeling the mediating role of thinking styles in the causal relationship of perception of parenting styles and motivational orientations, Family Stud. 18 (2022), no. 1, 97–119. [In Persian] [16] B. Ghadimi, B. Banimahd, and H. Nikoomaram, Individual moods, critical thinking and fraud risk assessment in auditing, J. Manag. Account. Audit. Knowledge, 11 (2022), no. 41, 315–323. [In Persian] [17] S.M. Golshaeian, M. Sadat Ghafari, and S.M. Seyyedi, Investigating the impact of social pressures, commitment and personality traits on the judgment of auditors, J. Account. Manag. Persp. 3 (2019), no. 23, 99–117. [In Persian] [18] M. Haider and H. Nikoumram, Thinking styles and professional skepticism in auditing (Theory of mental selfgovernment), J. Value Behav. Account. 3 (2017), no. 5, 151–185. [In Persian] [19] M. Haider, F. Rahnamay Roodpashti H. Nikoumaram, and B. Banimahd, Gender auditor and functional styles of thinking: The test of self-governing theory of mind, Knowledge Account. Manage. Audit, 7 (2017), no. 25, 1–10. [In Persian] [20] Y. Hassas Yaganeh and V. Jafari, Investigating the effect of rotation of audit firms on the quality of audit reports of companies accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange, J. Secur. Exchange 3 (2010), no. 9, 25–42. [In Persian] [21] J. Hongdizi, Y.-X. Cui, X. Zhou, and H.-K. Zhai, Influence of analytic processing on divergent and convergent thinking tasks: the role of rational and experiential thinking styles, J. Intell. 11 (2023), no. 2, 23. [22] J.-A. Johannessen, Appendix 1: Strategies, methods and techniques for thinking creatively, J.-A. Johannessen (Ed.), Consciousness and creativity in artificial intelligence, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 2023, pp. 89–117. [23] C. Ma-Kellams, Cultural variation and similarities in cognitive thinking styles versus judgment biases: A review of environmental factors and evolutionary forces, Rev. Gen. Psycho.24 (2020), no. 3, 238–253. [24] K. Mahdavian Rad, A. Zabihi, and K. Faghani Makarani, Thinking style and documentation style of independent auditors and its relationship with decision making style, Behav. Stud. Manage. 12 (2021), no. 26, 87–103. [In Persian] [25] T.G. Manyak and I.W. Katono, Conflict management style in Uganda: A gender perspective, Gender Manag.: Int. J. 25 (2010), no. 6, 509–521. [26] M. Mariya, H. Nikoumaram, and M.H. Khan Mohammadi, The effect of organizational culture on organizational malpractice reporting in the auditing profession, Financ. Account. Audit. Res. 12 (2019), no. 46, 27–50. [27] S. Mohsenin and M. Esfidani, Structural Equations Based on Partial Least Squares Approach Using Smart-PLS Software: Educational and Practical, Mehraban Publishing Institute, 2013. [In Persian] [28] R. Nemati Koshtali, M. Hamidian, S.M. Jafari, and M. Sarraf, The effect of auditors’ cognitive styles on fraud risk assessment (testing Grigorek’s energetic theory), J. Value Behav. Account. 5 (2019), no. 9, 1–33. [In Persian] [29] S. Peikarnegar Qalehroudkhani, B. Banimahd, S. Kheradyar, and H. Vakilifard, Thinking style’s and objectivity of the auditor, J. Manag. Account. Audit. Knowledge 9 (2019), no. 35, 69–82. [In Persian] [30] F. Rahnamay Roodpashti, H. Vakilifard, F. Lak, and A. Mohseni, Auditor style and comparability of financial statements, Manag. Account. 8 (2014), no. 25, 29–47. [In Persian] [31] R. Rashidi and G. Gol Mohammadnejad Bahrami, Investigating the relationship between thinking styles and learning styles with goal orientation of female students in the second year of high schools in Tabriz, J. Women Family Stud. 10 (2017), no. 38. [In Persian] [32] C. Rigg and J. Sparrow, Gender, diversity and working styles, Women Manag. Rev. 9 (1994), no. 1, 9–16. [33] M. Saeidi Goraghani and A. Nasseri, Individual differences and auditor’s professional judgment, Financ. Account. Audit Res. 9 (2018), no. 36, 111–129. [34] S. Saha and R.R.K. Sharma, The impact of personality and cognitive style of managers on their work types, J. Manag. Dev. 38 (2019), no. 1, 58–71. [35] I. Salo and C.M. Allwood, Decision-making styles, stress and gender among investigators, Policing: Int. J. 34 (2011), no. 1, 97–119. [36] M. Shahsavari, M. Abbaszadeh, and H. Hessari, The tone used in the auditor’s report and the auditor’s fee, emphasizing the moderating role of the requirements of the auditing standard No. 700, Empir. Stud. Financ. Account. 19 (2022), no. 76, 131–160. [In Persian] [37] R.J. Sternberg, Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development, Human Dev. 31 (1988), no. 4, 197–224. [38] J. Svanberg, P. Ohman, and P.E. Neidermeyer, ¨ Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs, Adv. Account. 44 (2019), 121–131. [39] F. Takeda, Employing string similarity metrics of partners to estimate audit team continuity: determinant and its effects on audit outcomes and pricing, J. Account. Liter. 45 (2023), no. 2, 314–339. [40] M. Tenenhaus, V.E. Vinzi, Y.-M. Chatelin, and C. Lauro, PLS path modeling, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48 (2005), no. 1, 159–205. [41] O. Turetken, S. Jethefer and B. Ozkan, Internal audit effectiveness: operationalization and influencing factors, Manag. Audit. J. 35 (2020), no. 2, 238–271. [42] K. Vengopal and K. Mridula, Styles of learning and thinking, J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychology, 33 (2009), no. 1, 111–118. [43] M. Wetzels, G. Odekerken-Schroder and C. Van Oppen, Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quart. 33 (2009), no. 1, 177–195. [44] R. Zamani and G. Mahdavi, The impact of leadership styles considerations and structure and organizational position on the professional commitment of auditors, Health Account. 9 (2019), no. 1, 21–40. [In Persian] | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 62 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 45 |