پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 628 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,179 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,526,924 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,061,616 |
Identification and evaluation of social risks in industrial-civil megaprojects with the help of multi-criteria decision-making techniques and system dynamics | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 22، دوره 15، شماره 10، دی 2024، صفحه 263-277 اصل مقاله (1.83 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.31579.4673 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyed Amin Seyedi1؛ Alireza Mirjalili* 1؛ Mahoudreza Maheri2؛ Abolfazl Sadeghian3 | ||
| 1Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Civil Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Industrial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 31 تیر 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 شهریور 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Megaprojects play an important role in economics, society, and the environment and during recent years have fast developed. However, due to frequent social involvement induced by the social impact, social risk control has become a big challenge. So, this study is based on the systematic analysis of social risks and behavioural models in megaprojects. This study proposed a model composed of multi-criteria decision-making techniques and system dynamics to analyze the social risks for megaprojects. After choosing the desired risks in the social dimension and obtaining the causal relationships through the DEMATEL-ANP (DANP) method, as seen in the chart, the relationships between the extant variables can be investigated and concluded. The results show that some risks including timely completion of the project and related issues regarding increasing time based on social problems, the extreme internal and external dissatisfaction of megaprojects, and the decreasing risk due to increasing cost are ranked the first, second, and third one, respectively. Also, the extreme internal and external dissatisfaction of the megaproject has the most impact. In this proposed model, the factors affecting the risk related to the timely completion of the project and associated issues regarding the increasing time can be investigated in such a way that the values of this parameter have increased because of an increase in the internal variables, and vice versa. The mutual impact of the variable, the extreme internal and external dissatisfaction of the megaproject, the decreasing risk of the project quality due to excessive increasing cost in terms of social and unpredicted issues, and social interventions of beneficiaries on the timely completion risk of the project and issues of increasing time can be observed. Also, in the below charts, the behaviour of this model has been investigated during 10 coming years by different scenarios. This study can facilitate the perception of social risk in terms of the risk evolution and provide the decision-making support to overcome the social risk with megaproject operation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Project؛ Megaproject؛ Risk؛ Social risk؛ DEMATEL-ANP؛ DANP؛ system dynamics | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] K. Aaltonen, Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29 (2011), no. 2, 165–183. [2] S. Agterbosch, R.M. Meertens, and W.J.V. Vermeulen, The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 (2009), no. 2, 393–405. [3] T. Aven and O. Renn, On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain, J. Risk Res. 12 (2009), no. 1, 1–11. [4] C.J. Barrow, How is environmental conflict addressed by SIA?, Environ. Impact Assess Rev. 30 (2010), 293–301. [5] C.N. Bredillet, Learning and acting in project situations through a metamethod (map) a case study: Contextual and situational approach for project management governance in management education, Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26 (2008), 238–250. [6] L. Chen, K.Z. Wu, J.H. Tan, and M.F. Li, Study on social risk appraise of construction project in China—a case from Guangzhou, Proc. Appl. Mech. Materials, Trans. Tech. Pub. 174 (2012), 2916–2924. [7] W.-Y. Chiu, G.-H. Tzeng, and H.-L. Li, A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business, Knowledge-based Syst. 37 (2013), 48–61. [8] K. De Bakker, A. Boonstra, and H. Wortmann, Risk management affecting IS/IT project success through communicative action, Proj. Manage. J. 42 (2011), no. 3, 75–90. [9] B. Flyvbjerg, Policy and planning for large infrastructure projects: problems, causes, cures, Envir. Plann. B: Plann. Design 34 (2007), no. 4, 578–597. [10] M. Hossein and O. Renn, A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment, Envir. Impact Assess. Rev. 43 (2013), no. 4, 1–8. [11] G. Jia, F. Yang, G. Wang, B. Hong, and R. You, A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29 (2011), no. 7, 817–827. [12] N. Khakzad, F. Khan and P. Amyotte, Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 104 (2012), 36–44. [13] W. Li, J. Yuan, C. Ji, S. Wei, and Q. Li, Agent-based simulation model for investigating the evolution of social risk in infrastructure projects in China: A social network perspective, Sustain. Cities Soc. 73 (2021), 103112. [14] Y. Lin, Policy thinking of strengthening social risk management in China, Comp. Econ. Soc. Syst. 6 (2002), 16–19. [15] J.P. Liu and Y.X. Li, An analysis on urban–rural conflict and cause of formation in the rapid process of urbanization, Theor. Issues 12 (2011), 5–9. [16] Y. Liu, C. Sun, B. Xia, C. Cui, and V. Coffey, Impact of community engagement on public acceptance towards waste-to-energy incineration projects: Empirical evidence from China, Waste Manag. 76 (2018), 431–442. [17] W. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Zhou, and J. Tang, Safety risk factors of metro tunnel construction in China: an integrated study with EFA and SEM, Safety Sci. 105 (2018), 98–113. [18] Z.-Z. Liu, Z.-W. Zhu, H.-J. Wang, and J. Huang, Handling social risks in government-driven mega-project: An empirical case study from West China, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 34 (2016), no. 2, 202–218. [19] M.-T. Lu, C.-C. Hsu, J.J.H. Liou, and H.-W. Lo, A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports, J. Air Transport Manag. 71 (2018), 9–19. [20] J. Miao, D. Huang, and Z. He, Social risk assessment and management for major construction projects in China based on fuzzy integrated analysis, Complexity 2019 (2019), 1–17. [21] S. Peng, G. Shi, and R. Zhang, Social stability risk assessment: status, trends and prospects— a case of land acquisition and resettlement in the hydropower sector, Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 39 (2021), no. 5, 379–395. [22] Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 4th ed. Project Management Institute, Inc., 2008. [23] O. Renn, Risk Governance, Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Earth Scan, London, 2008. [24] O. Renn and P. Sellke, Risk, society and policy-making: Risk governance in a complex world, Int. J. Perform. Eng. 7 (2011), no. 4, 349–366. [25] Q. Shi, Y. Liu, J. Zuo, N. Pan, and G. Ma, On the management of social risks of hydraulic infrastructure projects in China: a case study, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 33 (2015), no. 3, 483–496. [26] J. Sun and P. Zhang, Owner organization design for mega industrial construction projects, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29 (2011), no. 7, 828–833. [27] B.S. Tang, S.W. Wong, and C.H. Lau, Social impact assessment and public participation in China: a case study of land requisition in Guangzhou, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (2008), no. 1, 57–72. [28] J.E. Thomas Bohorquez, Development and social risk management: A historical contradiction?, Rev. De Geografia Norte Grande 48 (2011), 133–157. [29] F. Vanclay, Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26 (2006), no. 1, 3–14. [30] Y. Wang, Q. Han, B. De Vries, and J. Zuo, How the public reacts to social impacts in construction projects? A structural equation modeling study, Int. J. Proj. Manage. 34 (2016), no. 8, 1433–1448. [31] G. Wu, J. Tong, L. Zhang, D. Yuan, and Y. Xiao, Research on rapid source term estimation in nuclear accident emergency decision for pressurized water reactor based on Bayesian network, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 53 (2021), no. 8, 2534–2546. [32] C. Xiao-Zheng and H. Xiang-Ming, Study of social risk assessment on major projects based on risk perception, Proc. Int. Conf. Manag. Sci. Engin. 20th Ann. Conf. Proc., IEEE, 2013, pp. 1900–1905. [33] Y. Xue and P. Xiang, The social risk of high-speed rail projects in China: A Bayesian network analysis, Sustainability 12 (2020), no. 5, 2087. [34] R.J. Yang and P.X. Zou, Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model, Build. Environ. 73 (2014), no. 1, 208–222. [35] T. Yu, G.Q. Shen, Q. Shi, X. Lai, C.Z. Li, and K. Xu, Managing social risks at the housing demolition stage of urban redevelopment projects: A stakeholder-oriented study using social network analysis, Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35 (2017), no. 6, 925–941. [36] J. Yuan, K. Chen, W. Li, C. Ji, Z. Wang, and M.J. Skibniewski, Social network analysis for social risks of construction projects in high-density urban areas in China, J. Cleaner Product. 198 (2018), 940–961. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 405 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 188 |
||