پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 632 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,260 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,740,872 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,156,363 |
Presenting a model for improving the interaction between the auditor and the client based on grounded theory | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 16، دوره 16، شماره 2، اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 193-208 اصل مقاله (361.43 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.32791.4874 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Aboalfazl RadSaeed؛ Negar Khosravipour* ؛ Ali Esmaeilzadeh Magharri | ||
| Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Centeral Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 03 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 دی 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 12 دی 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The purpose of the current research is to provide a model for improving the interaction between the auditor and the client based on the grounded theory. In this regard, the factors of interaction between the auditor and the client were explained and the main components identified in order to improve the interaction between the auditor and the client were presented. Finally, the identified factors were ranked using the Friedman test. In order to extract effective factors for improving the interaction between the auditor and the employer, the foundation's data approach was used. Also, due to the lack of a coherent model in the literature related to improving the interaction between the auditor and the client in Iran, a semi-structured interview with experts was also used to cover the weak points of the existing theoretical foundations and to reach the stage of persuasion. The results of the foundation's data approach showed that the research model based on improving the interaction between the auditor and the client can be classified into 6 main categories, causal conditions, background conditions, strategies, intervention conditions and consequences. The results of Friedman's test indicated that the variables 1. the timeliness of providing information by company managers to auditors; 2. Acquaintance of auditors with the software used in preparing financial reports; 3. Internal audit; 4. activity history of auditors; 5. Reducing the anxiety of the audit staff, respectively, has a higher priority as an effective factor in improving the interaction of auditors with business owners. Also, it was found that the variables 1. tenure of auditors; 2. The size of the employer's company; 3. The presence of more non-commissioned directors in the structure of the board of directors of companies; 4. Mandatory rotation of auditors; 5. The acquaintance of the audit team members with updated and used software was less important from the point of view of the respondents. The findings of this research can help solve the complexities of the interaction between the auditor and the employer. The current research is based on the idea that there are factors that can improve this interaction and some factors cannot affect this interaction. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Auditor؛ Client؛ Interaction Between Auditor and Client؛ Grounded Theory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] A.A. Acito, C.E. Hogan, and R.D. Mergenthaler, The effects of PCAOB inspections on auditor-client relationships, Account, Rev,93 (2018), no. 2, 1–35. [2] B. Badpa, O. Pourheidari, and A. Khodamipour, The effect of supportive attitudes and familiarity of the auditor with the employer on the auditor’s initial judgment and evidence search strategy, Appl. Res. Financ. Rep. 8 (2018), no. 1, 42–47. [3] V. Beattie, S. Fearnley, and R. Brandt, A grounded theory model of auditor-client negotiations, Int. J. Audit. 8 (2018), no. 1, 1-19. [4] V. Beattie, S. Fearnley, and T. Hines, Auditor-client interactions in the changed UK regulatory environment a revised grounded theory model, Int. J. Audit. 19 (2015), no. 1, 15–36. [5] S.N. Bronson, A. Masli, and J. H. Schroeder, Releasing earnings when the audit is less complete: Implications for audit quality and the auditor/client relationship, Account. Horizons 35 (2021), no. 2, 27–55. [6] J.L. Callen and X. Fang, Crash risk and the auditor-client relationship, Contemp. Account. Res. 34 (2017), no. 3, 1715–1750. [7] M. Carlisle and E.L. Hamilton, The role of communication mode in auditor-client interactions: Insights from staff auditors, Current Issues Audit. 15 (2021), no. 1, 19–37. [8] M. Carlisle, C. Gimbar, and J.G. Jenkins, Auditor-client interactions-an exploration of power dynamics during audit evidence collection, Audit.: J. Practice Theory 42 (2023), no. 1, 27–51. [9] B. E. Christensen, T. C. Omer, M. K. Shelley, and P.A. Wong, Affiliated former partners on the audit committee: Influence on the auditor-client relationship and audit quality, Audit.: J. Practice Theory 38 (2019), no. 3, 95–119. [10] B.K. Church, N.T. Dai, X. Kuang, and X. Liu, The role of auditor narcissism in auditor-client negotiations: Evidence from China, Contemp. Account. Res. 37 (2020), no. 3, 1756–1787. [11] M. DeFond and J. Zhang, A review of archival auditing research, J. Account. Econ. 58 (2014), no. 2-3, 275–326. [12] M.K. Dodgson, C.P. Agoglia, G B. Bennett, and J.R. Cohen, Managing the auditor-client relationship through partner rotations: The experiences of audit firm partners, Account. Rev. 95 (2020),no. 2, 89-111. [13] M. Gibbins, S. McCracken, and S.E. Salterio, The auditor’s strategy selection for negotiation with management: Flexibility of initial accounting position and nature of the relationship, Account. Organ. Soc. 35 (2001), no. 6, 579–595. [14] H. Guenin-Paracini, B. Malsch, and M.S. Tremblay, On the operational reality of auditors’ independence: Lessons from the field, Audit.: J. Practice Theory 34 (2015), no. 2, 201–236. [15] Y. Hassas Yeganeh and A.A. Arab Ahmadi, Factors affecting the decision to accept employers in audit institutions, Empir. Stud. Financ. Account. 5 (2007), no. 19, 93–114. [16] R.C. Hatfield and A. Saiewitz, Theoretical and practical guidance for incorporating auditor-client communication in experimental research, Audit.: J. Practice - Theory 41 (2022), no. 4, 163–177. [17] R.C. Hatfield, C.E. Mullis, and K.T. Trotman, Interactive auditor-client negotiations: The effects of the accumulating nature and direction of audit differences, Account. Rev. 97 (2022), no. 7, 223–241. [18] N. Hellman, Auditor-client interaction and client usefulness-A Swedish case study, Int. J. Audit. 10 (2006), no. 2, 99–124. [19] D.N. Herda and J.J. Lavelle, How the auditor-client relationship affects the extent of value-added service provided to the client, Current Issues Audit. 7 (2013), no. 1, 9–14. [20] S.J. Kachelmeier, Testing auditor-client interactions without letting auditors and clients fully interact: Comments on Bennett and Hatfield (2018), Account. Organ. Soc. 68 (2018), 58-62. [21] M. Kazemi Ulum, J. Rezazadeh, and Gh. Kurdestani, Identifying and ranking the factors influencing the adoption of scoring strategy in the negotiations between the auditor and the employer, Biann. Sci. J. Value Behav. Account. 4 (2018), no. 8, 213–163. [22] W.R. Knechel, E. Thomas, and M. Driskill, Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective, Account. Organ. Soc. 81 (2020), 101080. [23] M. Lari Dasht Beyaz, H. Khadim, and K. Hamidepour, Communication strategies of auditors for optimal interaction with the employer, First Nat. Conf. Audit. Financ. Supervision of Iran, Mashhad, 2015. [In Persian] [24] A. Mustikarini and D. Adhariani, In auditor we trust: 44 years of research on the auditor-client relationship and future research directions, Meditari Account. Res. 30 (2022), no. 2, 267–292. [25] J.N. Myers, L.A. Myers, and T.C. Omer, Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation?, Account. Rev. 78 (2003), no. 3, 779–799. [26] M. Sadeghian, H. Jahangirnia, and R. Gholami Jamkarani, The role of ethics in the strategic interaction between the independent auditor and management based on game theory, Knowledge Account. Manag. Audit 8 (2018), no. 29, 43–56. [27] A. Saiewitz and T. Kida, The effects of an auditor’s communication mode and professional tone on client responses to audit inquiries, Account. Organ. Soc. 65 (2018), 33–43. [28] K.T. Trotman, A.M. Wright, and S. Wright, Auditor negotiations: An examination of the efficacy of intervention methods, Account. Rev. 80 (2005), no. 1, 349–367. [29] N. van Nieuw Amerongen, E. Coskun, J. Van Buuren, and H.B. Duits, The coherence of the auditor-client relationship quality and auditor tenure with client’s perceptions on added-value in SME audits: a sociological perspective, Manag. Audit. J. 37 (2022), no. 3, 358–379. [30] B.Warming-Rasmussen and L. Jensen, Quality dimensions in external audit services-An external user perspective, Eur. Account. Rev. 7 (1998), no. 1, 65–82. [31] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1990. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 305 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 240 |
||