پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 632 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,260 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 67,740,919 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,156,383 |
Improved Coot optimization algorithm with Levy flight for shape and size optimization of Truss structures | ||
| International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications | ||
| مقاله 26، دوره 16، شماره 2، اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 325-342 اصل مقاله (3 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33291.4954 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sasan Fardi Zarnagh؛ Mahdi Nouri* ؛ Seyed Arash Mousavi Ghasemi | ||
| Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Department of Civil engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 24 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 اسفند 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 اسفند 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The convergence issues and getting trapped in local optimal points are two of the major concerns in the field of optimization. For this purpose, improving the standard algorithms to reach better performance in facing complex optimization problems is considered as one of the main challenges in the field of optimization. In this paper, the performance improvement of metaheuristic algorithms is considered while the applicability of the improved and standard algorithms is evaluated through the weight optimization problem of truss structures. For this purpose, the recently proposed Coot optimization algorithm is utilized as the main algorithm which is inspired by different movement types of Coot birds in the water in order to reach food supplies. Regarding the fact that the standard Coot algorithm utilizes random movement in the main search loop, a new improving methodology is utilized in this paper by replacing these random movements with Levy flight as a stochastic procedure with step length defined by levy distribution. The performance of the standard and improved Coot optimization algorithms is investigated in dealing with the problem of optimizing the shape and size of truss structures. Based on the best and statistical results, it is concluded that the improved Coot algorithm is capable of providing better results that the standard Coot algorithm while the capability of the improving methods in increasing the overall performance of the standard algorithm is demonstrated. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Coot optimization algorithm؛ Truss structure؛ Metaheuristic algorithm؛ Levy flight؛ Optimization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] B. Adil and B. Cengiz, Optimal design of truss structures using weighted superposition attraction algorithm, Engin. Comput. 36 (2020), no. 3, 965–979. [2] M. Artar and A.T. Daloglu, Optimum design of steel space truss towers under seismic effect using Jaya algorithm, Struct. Engin. Mech. 71 (2019), no. 1, 1–12. [3] R. Cazacu and L. Grama, Steel truss optimization using genetic algorithms and FEA, Procedia Technol. 12 (2014), no. 2, 339–346. [4] I. Farajpour, Constrained optimization of structures with displacement constraints under various loading conditions, Adv. Engin. Software 41 (2010), no. 4, 580–589. [5] L. Fenu, G.C. Marano, E. Congiu, and B. Briseghella, Optimum design of an arched truss under vertical and horizontal multi-load cases, Proc. IASS Ann. Symp. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. (IASS) Conf., 2019, no. 17, pp. 1–8. [6] H.M. Gomes, Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), no. 1, 957–968. [7] V. Ho-Huu, T. Vo-Duy, T. Luu-Van, L. Le-Anh, and T. Nguyen-Thoi, Optimal design of truss structures with frequency constraints using improved differential evolution algorithm based on an adaptive mutation scheme, Automat. Const. 68 (2016), no. 12, 81–94. [8] S. Jalili and A. Husseinzadeh Kashan, An optics-inspired optimization method for optimal design of truss structures, [9] F.K. Jawad, M. Mahmood, D. Wang, A.A. Osama, and A.J. Anas, Heuristic dragonfly algorithm for optimal design of truss structures with discrete variables, Structures 29 (2021), no. 3, 843–862. [10] F.K. Jawad, C. Ozturk, W. Dansheng, M. Mahmood, O. Al-Azzawi, and A. Al-Jemely, Sizing and layout optimization of truss structures with artificial bee colony algorithm, Structures 30 (2021), no. 4, 546–559. [11] R. Karkauskas and A. Norkus, Truss optimization under stiffness, stability constraints and random loading, Mech. Res. Commun. 33 (2006), no. 2, 177–189. [12] A. Kaveh and M.I. Ghazaan, Hybridized optimization algorithms for design of trusses with multiple natural frequency constraints, Adv. Engin. Software 79 (2015), no. 4, 137–147. [13] A. Kaveh, B. Mirzaeib, and A. Jafarvand, An improved magnetic charged system search for optimization of truss structures with continuous and discrete variables, Appl. Soft Comput. 28 (2015), no. 1, 400–410. [14] A. Kaveh and M. R. Seddighian, Simultaneously multi-material layout, and connectivity optimization of truss structures via an Enriched Firefly Algorithm, Structures 27 (2020), no. 4, 2217–2231. [15] A. Kaveh and A. Zolghadr, Democratic PSO for truss layout and size optimization with frequency constraints, Comput. Struct. 130 (2014), no. 4, 10–21. [16] M. Khatibinia and S.S. Naseralavi, Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on orthogonal multi-gravitational search algorithm, J. Sound Vib. 333 (2014), no. 24, 6349–6369. [17] K.Y. Kok, H.H. Lau, T.D. Phan, and T.C. Ting, Design optimisation for cold-formed steel residential roof truss using genetic algorithm, World J. Engin. 15 (2018), no. 5, 575–583. [18] M. Kooshkbaghi, A. Kaveh, and P. Zarfam, Different discrete ACCS algorithms for optimal design of truss structures: A comparative study, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civil Engin. 44 (2020), no. 1, 49–68. [19] W. Lingyun, Z. Mei, W. Guangming, and M. Guang, Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm, Comput. Mech. 35 (2005), no. 5, 361–368. [20] L.F. Miguel and L.F. Miguel, Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms, Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), no. 10, 9458–9467. [21] A. Mortazavi, A new fuzzy strategy for size and topology optimization of truss structures, Appl. Soft Comput. 93 (2020), no. 2, 106412. [22] A. Mortazavi and V. Togan, Metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of truss structures, Advances in Structural Engineering—Optimization, Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 199–220. [23] I. Naruei and F. Keynia, A new optimization method based on COOT bird natural life model, Expert Syst. Appl. 183 (2021), no. 1, 115352. [24] J. Pan and D.Y.Wang, Topology optimization of truss structure with fundamental frequency and frequency domain dynamic response constraints, Acta Mech. Solida Sinica 19 (2006), no. 3, 231–240. [25] D. Prayogo, G. Gaby, B.H. Wijaya, and F.T. Wong, Reliability-based design with size and shape optimization of truss structure using symbiotic organisms search, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 506 (2020), no. 1, 012047. [26] R. Sedaghati, Benchmark case studies in structural design optimization using the force method, Int. J. Solids Struct. 42 (2005), no. 21, 5848–5871. [27] Y. Sun, H. Li, M. Shabaz, and A. Sharma, Research on building truss design based on particle swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, Int. J. Syst. Assurance Engin. Manag. 13 (2021), no. 1, 38–48. [28] D. Wang and W. Xu, Minimum Weight Optimal Design of Truss Structure with Frequency Response Function Constraint, J. Aerospace Engin. 33 (2020), no. 4, 04020028. [29] L. Yan-Cang and X. Pei-Dong. Improved wolf pack algorithm for optimum design of truss structures, Executive Manag. 6 (2020), no. 81411. [30] J. Ye, An improved neutrosophic number optimization method for optimal design of truss structures, New Math. Natural Comput. 14 (2018), no. 3, 295–305. [31] W. Zuo, J. Bai, and B. Li, A hybrid OC–GA approach for fast and global truss optimization with frequency constraints, Appl. Soft Comput. 14 (2014), no. 3, 528–535. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 407 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 260 |
||