پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 687 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,985 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 70,959,065 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 62,423,257 |
The Impact of Mortar Properties on the Compressive Strength of a Masonry Prism | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 37، اردیبهشت 2025، صفحه 48-65 اصل مقاله (2.24 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2024.32890.1971 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Raisul Islam Shuvo* 1؛ Sharmin Reza Chowdhury2؛ Rukshana Parvin Ripa3؛ Sadia Sabrin3؛ Foysal Ahmed Shohag3 | ||
| 1Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science And Technology, Bangladesh | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science And Technology, Bangladesh | ||
| 3Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science And Technology, Bangladesh | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 26 خرداد 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 مرداد 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| \Masonry buildings remain popular worldwide due to their readily available materials, high compressive strength, ease of construction, and affordability. Therefore, understanding the impact of mortar on the compressive strength of masonry is essential. This study aimed to determine the compressive strength and failure patterns of masonry, focusing particularly on mortar. An experimental program was conducted, involving a total of 54 specimens: 27 cubes, 27 cylinders, and 9 masonry prisms. The cement-to-sand ratio (c/s) varied at ratios of 1:3, 1:4, and 1:5, while the water-to-cement ratio (w/c) remained fixed at 0.45. Each prism consisted of 5 bricks separated by a 10 mm mortar layer. Compressive strength data for cubes and cylinders were collected at 3, 7, and 28 days, while data for prisms were collected only at 28 days. The best results have been obtained at a c/s ratio of 1:3, with compressive strengths of 3555.5 psi for cubes, 3282.98 psi for cylinders, and a compressive force value of 129.33 kN for prisms at 28 days. The compressive strength of cubes and cylinders increases by approximately 68.19% and 64.61%, respectively, and the compressive force of masonry prisms increases by approximately 76.48% at 28 days when the cement-to-sand ratio is changed from 1:5 to 1:3. Stresses, graphs, and failure patterns have been analyzed and compared with the Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) 2020 and available literature, revealing a strong correlation. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Mortar؛ Cement to sand ratio؛ Compressive strength؛ Prism؛ Failure pattern | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Javed K, Hassan MI ul, Farooq MA, Sharif MB. Detailed investigation of compressive and bond strength for sustainable brick masonry developed by using various types of bricks and green mortars. J Build Eng 2024;84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108477.
[2] MCAA. HISTORY OF MASONRY 2022.
[3] Soleymani A, Jahangir H, Nehdi ML. Damage detection and monitoring in heritage masonry structures: Systematic review. Constr Build Mater 2023;397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132402.
[4] Izadi M, Hosseini A, Michels J, Motavalli M, Ghafoori E. Thermally activated iron-based shape memory alloy for strengthening metallic girders. Thin-Walled Struct 2019;141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.036.
[5] Haach V, Vasconcelos G, Mohamad G. Influence of the Mortar on the Compressive Behavior of Concrete Masonry Prisms. Rev Da Assoc Port Análise Exp Tensões 2010;18.
[6] Rafi MM, Khan S. Assessing Mechanical Properties of Concrete Block Masonry under Uniaxial Compression for Design Applications. J Mater Civ Eng 2024;36. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-16417.
[7] Foraboschi P. Masonry does not limit itself to only one structural material: Interlocked masonry versus cohesive masonry. J Build Eng 2019;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100831.
[8] Hasnat A, Islam MR, Ahsan R, Alam AT. Strength Comparison of Unreinforced Masonry Wall made of Different Types of Brick. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2023;11:160–77. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2023.28394.1711.
[9] Jahangir H, Esfahani MR. Bond Behavior Investigation Between Steel Reinforced Grout Composites and Masonry Substrate. Iran J Sci Technol - Trans Civ Eng 2022;46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-022-00826-9.
[10] Patel M. Types of Masonry that can be Used for Construction of your Dream Home 2018.
[11] History. Egyptian Pyramids 2019.
[12] Kim YY, Lee KM, Bang JW, Kwon SJ. Effect of W/C ratio on durability and porosity in cement mortar with constant cement amount. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014;2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/273460.
[13] Zhou J, Chen X, Wu L, Kan X. Influence of free water content on the compressive mechanical behaviour of cement mortar under high strain rate. Sadhana - Acad Proc Eng Sci 2011;36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-011-0024-6.
[14] Haach VG, Vasconcelos G, Loureno PB. Influence of aggregates grading and water/cement ratio in workability and hardened properties of mortars. Constr Build Mater 2011;25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.011.
[15] Dehestani M, Nikbin IM, Asadollahi S. Effects of specimen shape and size on the compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete (SCC). Constr Build Mater 2014;66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.008.
[16] Singh SB, Munjal P. Bond strength and compressive stress-strain characteristics of brick masonry. J Build Eng 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.11.006.
[17] Kaushik HB, Rai DC, Jain SK. Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression. J Mater Civ Eng 2007;19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728).
[18] Gumaste KS, Rao KSN, Reddy BVV, Jagadish KS. Strength and elasticity of brick masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. Mater Struct Constr 2007;40. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9141-9.
[19] Wu F, Li G, Li HN, Jia JQ. Strength and stress-strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Mater Struct Constr 2013;46. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y.
[20] ASTM International. ASTM C305 Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. ASTM Stand B 2020.
[21] ASTM. ASTM C109: Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars. Am Soc Test Mater 1988;4031.
[22] Bangladesh National Building Code. BNBC 2020. Bangladesh: Housing and Building Research Institute; 2020.
[23] Holst JMFG, Rotter JM, Calladine CR, Eoin Dunphy, NORM ESNEEuro, DNV, et al. Eurocode 6 - Design of masonry structures - Part 1-2: General rules - Structural fire design EN 1996-1-2 May. J Constr Steel Res 2011;54.
[24] Hamad AJ. Size and shape effect of specimen on the compressive strength of HPLWFC reinforced with glass fibres. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci 2017;29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.09.003. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 579 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 814 |
||