Khani, Vahid, Pourali, Mohammad Reza, Samadi Largani, Mahmoud, Gilaninia Someesaraei, Behnam. (1405). The model for determining the materiality of auditing in the Iranian environment. هنرهای کاربردی, 17(4), 145-162. doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33306.4955
Vahid Khani; Mohammad Reza Pourali; Mahmoud Samadi Largani; Behnam Gilaninia Someesaraei. "The model for determining the materiality of auditing in the Iranian environment". هنرهای کاربردی, 17, 4, 1405, 145-162. doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33306.4955
Khani, Vahid, Pourali, Mohammad Reza, Samadi Largani, Mahmoud, Gilaninia Someesaraei, Behnam. (1405). 'The model for determining the materiality of auditing in the Iranian environment', هنرهای کاربردی, 17(4), pp. 145-162. doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33306.4955
Khani, Vahid, Pourali, Mohammad Reza, Samadi Largani, Mahmoud, Gilaninia Someesaraei, Behnam. The model for determining the materiality of auditing in the Iranian environment. هنرهای کاربردی, 1405; 17(4): 145-162. doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33306.4955

The model for determining the materiality of auditing in the Iranian environment

International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
مقاله 13، دوره 17، شماره 4، تیر 2026، صفحه 145-162    اصل مقاله (1.95 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/ijnaa.2024.33306.4955
نویسندگان
Vahid Khani1؛ Mohammad Reza Pourali* 2؛ Mahmoud Samadi Largani1؛ Behnam Gilaninia Someesaraei3
1Department of Accounting, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
2Department of Accounting, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran
3Department of Accounting, Roudsar and Amlash Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudsar, Iran
چکیده
This study explores the materiality of auditing within the Iranian context, addressing critical choices and assessments made by auditors throughout the audit process, including planning, evidence gathering, and evaluation. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, it involves qualitative interviews with 18 audit and accounting experts and a quantitative survey of 213 respondents. The qualitative phase employs grounded theory to identify key categories influencing materiality thresholds, such as decision-making processes, ethical considerations, and adherence to regulations. The quantitative phase validates these findings through a researcher-designed questionnaire. Key outcomes include improved information accuracy, enhanced financial transparency, and increased public trust in audit reports. The study also identifies various conditions affecting materiality assessments, including legal requirements, industry characteristics, and internal control systems. Confirmatory factor analysis supports the causal relationships within the proposed structural model, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding materiality in auditing practices.
کلیدواژه‌ها
audit materiality؛ the Iranian environment؛ auditors' judgment؛ financial reporting
مراجع
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 539
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 723
دانشگاه سمنان
پیوندهای مفید
آمار
تعداد نشریات22
تعداد شماره‌ها722
تعداد مقالات10,383
تعداد مشاهده مقاله72,840,586
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله64,537,344