پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 671 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,744 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 69,312,605 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 48,568,416 |
Risk Assessment and Safety Precautions for Construction Site Scaffolding | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 10، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 28، بهمن 2022، صفحه 1-13 اصل مقاله (869.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Regular Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22075/jrce.2021.22451.1480 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ajibola Ibrahim Quadri* 1؛ Olaolu George Fadugba2 | ||
| 1Yokohama National University, Japan | ||
| 2Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 05 بهمن 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 17 آذر 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 آذر 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Accidents from heights are rampant and are rising day by day, with a higher number of injuries and deaths recorded in the construction industry. Some of the impacts of these incidents are the characteristic nature of the construction sector; unfailing deadlines to be met, environmental conditions during construction, natural and man-made disasters, lack of skilled manpower, undue gain over the provision of the best materials for construction. This paper gives an account of investigations of 100 scaffolding structures erected on-site in South East of Japan in terms of conformity with safety guidelines specified by the Japan International Centre for Occupation safety and health (JICOSH). Different kinds of hazards associated with falls from heights as well as the possible collapse of scaffolding due to human error/negligence and structural problem were also collated randomly from different construction and rehabilitation sites and are presented. Qualitative appraisal of conditions of some scaffolding components such as bracing, guardrails, platforms, struts and dresses, etc., which are categorized into standardized and non-standardized operations were done. According to the investigation, the most significant factor influencing the scaffold accident is structural safety, particularly the improper use of clamps and connectors which are critical elements on site. It is indispensable that trained personnel are hired to carryout scaffolding operation for effective safety. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Scaffolding؛ Safety precautions؛ JICOSH recommendation؛ Fall from height؛ Site investigation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Social Security Organization (SOSCO). (2000). Annual Report on Building Sites. Kuala Lumpur.https://presspage-production-content.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2731/annualreport2000.pdf?10000
[2]. Chong H.Y. & Low T.S. (2014). – Accidents in Malaysian Construction Industry: Statistical Data and Court Cases. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 20 (3), 503–513. doi:10.1080/10803548.2014.11077064.
[3]. Worker deaths by falls: a summary of surveillance findings and investigative case reports. (2000). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2000116.
[4]. Hinze J. & Russell D.B. (1995). – Analysis of Fatalities Recorded by OSHA. J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 121 (2), 209–214. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:2(209).
[5]. Joint CIB W099 & TG59 International Safety H. and People in Construction Conference, Emuze, Fidelis, Behm M., Central University of Technology F.S., & Dept. of Built Environment, eds. (2017). – Joint CIB W099 & TG59 International Safety, Health, and People in Construction Conference.
[6]. Salminen S. (2004). – Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review. J. Safety Res., 35 (5), 513–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.005.
[7]. Lateef H.T. & Quadri A.I. (2018). – Human Error Uncertainties for Structural Detailing in Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Proc. Eng. Eng. Technol. Technol., 2 (3), 1–15. doi:file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HumanErrorProbability.pdf.
[8]. Lipecki T., Jamińska-Gadomska P., Bęc J. & Błazik-Borowa E. (2020). – Façade scaffolding behaviour under wind action. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 20 (1), 27. doi:10.1007/s43452-020-00034-0.
[9]. Faergemann C. & Larsen L.B. (2000). – Non-occupational ladder and scaffold fall injuries. Accid. Anal. Prev., 32 (6), 745–750. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00124-4.
[10].Saurin T.A. & Guimarães L.B. de M. (2008). – Ergonomic assessment of suspended scaffolds. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 38 (2), 238–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.11.010.
[11].Halperin K.M. & McCann M. (2004). – An evaluation of scaffold safety at construction sites. J. Safety Res., 35 (2), 141–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.11.004.
[13]. Pieńko M., Robak A., Błazik-Borowa E. & Szer J. (2018). – Safety Conditions Analysis of Scaffolding on Construction Sites. Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng., 12 (2), 7.
[14].Hamdan N. & Awang H. (2015). – SAFETY SCAFFOLDING IN THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. J. Teknol., 75 (5). doi:10.11113/jt.v75.4956.
[15].Buckley S.M., Chalmers D.J. & Langley J.D. (1996). – Falls from buildings and other fixed structures in New Zealand. Saf. Sci., 21 (3),247–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/09257535(95)00068-2.
[16]. Błazik-Borowa E. & Szer J. (2015). – The analysis of the stages of scaffolding “life” with regard to the decrease in the hazard at building works. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 15 (2), 516–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.009.
[17].Whitaker S.M., Graves R.J., James M. & McCann P. (2003). – Safety with access scaffolds: Development of a prototype decision aid based on accident analysis. J. Safety Res., 34 (3), 249–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00025-2.
[18].Nadhim E., Hon C., Xia B., Stewart I. & Fang D. (2016). – Falls from Height in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review of the Scientific Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, 13 (7), 638. doi:10.3390/ijerph13070638.
[19].Camino López M.A., Ritzel D.O., Fontaneda I. & González Alcantara O.J. (2008). – Construction industry accidents in Spain. J. Safety Res., 39 (5), 497–507. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2008.07.006.
[20].Lipecki T., Jamińska-Gadomska P., Bęc J. & Błazik-Borowa E. (2020). – Façade scaffolding behaviour under wind action. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 20 (1), 27. doi:10.1007/s43452-020-00034-0.
[21].Dąbrowski A. (2015). – An investigation and analysis of safety issues in Polish small construction plants. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 21 (4), 498–511. doi:10.1080/10803548.2015.1085206.
[22].Japan International Centre for Occupation safety and health (2008). Regulation Concerning the Prevention of Industrial Accidents due to Falls from Heights. JICOSH, Japan; https://www.jniosh.johas.go.jp/icpro/jicosh-old/english/osh/outline/16.html
[23].EN12810-1. (2002) Façade scaffolds made of prefabricated components—Part 1: Product specifcations, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium,: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/EN_12810-1%7B2003%7D_(E).pdf
[24].British Standards Institution & National Standards Authority of Ireland (2004). – Temporary works equipment. performance requirement and general design. Part 1, Part 1,.
[25].Kines P. (2003). – Case studies of occupational falls from heights: Cognition and behavior in context. J. Safety Res., 34 (3), 263–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00023-9.
[26].TANAKA K., WASHIDA M., NISHIUKE Y. & HIRAISHI T. (2020). – Numerical Simulation of Storm Surges and Waves Caused by Typhoon Jebi in Osaka Bay with Consideration of Sudden Change of Wind Field. J. Nat. Disaster Sci., 40 (2), 44–68. doi:10.2328/jnds.40.44.
[27].Motosaka M. & Mitsuji K. (2012). – Building damage during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Soils Found., 52 (5), 929–944. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.012.
[28].TAKAHASHI Y. & HOSHIKUMA J. ichi (2013). – DAMAGE TO ROAD BRIDGES INDUCED BY GROUND MOTION IN THE 2011 GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE. J. JSCE, 1 (1), 398–410. doi:10.2208/journalofjsce.1.1_398.
[29].http://goinjapanesque.com/map-of-japan-en/ 17th August, 2020. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,504 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,542 |
||